2014
Stasis: Seed dormancy from 360 million years ago
Morning coffee!! Put these people in charge of explaining away design in nature
Urgent! Darwin’s followers need this kind of a public
All four segs of Richard Sternberg on supposed “junk DNA”
Mathematician John Lennox asks, Is information evidence of something beyond nature?
On the impossibility of replicating the cell: A problem for naturalism
I have sometimes had the idea that the best way for Intelligent Design advocates to make their case would be to build a giant museum replicating the complexity of the cell on a large scale, so that people could see for themselves how the cell worked and draw their own conclusions. Recently I came across an old quote from biochemist Michael Denton’s Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (Adler and Adler, 1985) which put paid to that idea, but which raised an interesting philosophical puzzle for people who adhere to scientific naturalism – which I define here as the view that there is nothing outside the natural world, by which I mean the sum total of everything that behaves in accordance Read More ›
Rob Sheldon on the muted response to Nature’s suggested evolution rethink
Must CSI Include the Probabilities of All Natural Processes — Known and Unknown?
Over on another thread, there has been some discussion (among other things) about whether the concept of CSI must include a calculation of probabilities under all natural processes. There are a number of interesting issues relating to CSI that might be worth exploring in more detail (including Learned Hand’s comments @47 of that thread, and the issues I mentioned @139). For now, however, I want to simply flag an issue that has been harped on for years by various individuals (Liddle, ribczynski, and in the recent thread, keith s and wd400). In summary, the argument is that without knowing all the probabilities of all possible natural processes we cannot ever be certain that some natural process didn’t produce the biological system in Read More ›
Orgel and 500 Coins
In his 1973 book The Origins of Life Leslie Orgel wrote: “Living organisms are distinguished by their specified complexity. Crystals such as granite fail to qualify as living because they lack complexity; mixtures of random polymers fail to qualify because they lack specificity.” (189). In my post On “Specified Complexity,” Orgel and Dembski I demonstrated that in this passage Orgel was getting at the exact same concept that Dembski calls “specified complexity.” In a comment to that post “Robb” asks: 500 coins, all heads, and therefore a highly ordered pattern. What would Orgel say — complex or not? Orgel said that crystals, even though they display highly ordered patterns, lack complexity. Would he also say that the highly ordered pattern Read More ›
Origin of life: Deep fluids played a role, in early Earth?
Complex life may only be even possible in 10 percent of galaxies?
Officially printed responses to that Nature “rethink evolution” article
New User Feature at UD
You will now have 20 minutes in which to edit your comments. We hope this makes our user interface more friendly.