2014
Guy carts out bad science writing, along with demolished literary Darwinism
A quick question for Dr. Liddle and other skeptics
Over at The Skeptical Zone, Dr. Elizabeth Liddle has written a thought-provoking post, which poses an interesting ethical conundrum about the morality of creating sentient beings. Dr. Liddle’s post was titled, Getting some stuff off my chest…., and its tone was remarkably conciliatory, as the following extracts reveal: I don’t think that science has disproven, nor even suggests, that it is unlikely that an Intelligent Designer was responsible for the world, and intended it to come into existence. I don’t think that science has, nor even can, prove that divine and/or miraculous intervention is impossible. I think the world has properties that make it perfectly possible for an Intelligent Deity to “reach in” and tweak things to her liking – Read More ›
Shut up, they explained. But we didn’t. And so …
Unlucky thirteen? Last year “terrible” for evolution, says Karl Giberson
Geneticist Todd Wood offers an apology
On consciousness, Tegmark gets one thing right, says Rob Sheldon
It’s Sunday morning so I get to talk about the praying mantis, right?
Fantastic Experiment Shows Bird Formations Contradict Evolution
When aircraft fly the air pressure on the underside of the wing is greater than on the topside. This pressure difference provides the needed lift force on the wings. It also causes the air at the end of the wing to move upward and then around in a circle, resulting in a strong vortex that trails the wing tips as the aircraft flies (see photo). Birds also have trailing vortices but they are far more complex given the complicated shape of the wing and the bird’s flapping motion. And so while it is tempting to think that the familiar V-formation used by migrating birds is for aerodynamic efficiency, evolutionists have long since been skeptical because of the tremendous precision that Read More ›
Getting cast into outer darkness …
Why the best arguments for the existence of God are not stupid
The New Republic has just published Professor Jerry Coyne’s critical review of David Bentley Hart’s latest work, The Experience of God: Being, Consciousness, Bliss, despite the fact that Coyne openly admits to not having read Hart’s book, although he says he intends to. For a literary magazine like The New Republic, I have to say that this marks a new low. Let me declare up-front that I haven’t read Hart’s book, either. I am, however, familiar with much of Hart’s thinking, because I’ve made the effort to understand him on his own terms. Jerry Coyne’s review, titled, The ‘Best Arguments for God’s Existence’ Are Actually Terrible, rests on a complete misunderstanding of what Hart is saying in his book, and Read More ›
Popular science writer “sort of” gets it about the multiverse scam
Atheist novelist sears popular science writing
Transition to land remake: Now starring … the trilobite
Evolutionist: Science Doesn’t Lie
In her wacky video promoting evolution Carin Bondar states that science doesn’t lie. This sentiment is common amongst evolutionists and the problem is that evolution isn’t science, and if it was, then science would be guilty of lying. Over the top criticism? No, these simply are the facts. Read more