From Evolution News & Views:
What can we hope to learn about animal minds?
Consciousness (a mind) perceives and acts on information. But there are at least two — more basic and probably unconscious qualities — that distinguish life from non-life, and seem to act by processing information: self-preservation and adaptability.
Life forms constantly try to preserve themselves in a living state — that is, they try to survive. They adapt their methods as needed, whenever possible. A rock falls from a high cliff and breaks; a cat has somehow learned to relax, turn in mid-air, and land on his feet. Or consider Slijper’s goat and Faith the dog, both of whom, born without forelegs, adapted to a lifestyle that is quite unnatural for their species.
But why do life forms struggle so hard to remain alive when the option of simply dying — ceasing to be a life form at all, and rejoining the chemical seas — is readily available, and eventually inevitable?
Naturalist explanations don’t turn out to be much help with any of this. More.
The tree of intelligence topples, but not where anyone expected
What we know about how animals think
Follow UD News at Twitter!
One Reply to “Naturalism, it turns out, is no match even for the animal mind”
Life is desperately trying to survive. Christian doctrine teaches there was a fall and so life is decaying and so in response to obey Gods demand to continue life finds ways to survive. Since this is the great objective I suggest the animals memories are focused uniquely, for them, on these important problems and they figure out what to do.
They get smart and then back to dumb when the great need is satisfied.