Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

2017 44th Annual March for Life — Live Stream (UPDATED)

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Today is the 44th annual March for Life, which is being live-streamed in several locations.

Let us host it here, for UD (following up from a discussion of three marches in Washington DC, here)  . . . this stream will go “live” later this morning. I note due to heightened security concerns, Airport type screening will be used for those seeking to march — the contrast with the last two marches in the same city is telling:

[UPDATE — post-march video, this is an historic event]

MRC two minute summary showing the crowds, civility and messages that are not in the major media:

[youtube SMf10C3g54I]

ADDED, HT BA77: The flow of the march —

[youtube -EPZ8gMdoJc]

US VP Mike Pence’s speech:

[youtube OvJPqxdEPkI]

EWTN full coverage:

[youtube 7IvY5qVgq8w]

Ultrasound scans of babies in utero — direct scientific evidence:

[youtube sVB0qTiq5jU]

Now — never mind the grammatical error (it’s a striking amateur effort, which I corrected . . . ) — too, let us ponder i/l/o what we just saw:

bacvsheartbeat

Why host this live stream — and now archival footage — here at UD?

Because, first, life is the first right without which there are no other rights; where (on figures tracing to Guttmacher) 800+ million unborn children have been slaughtered in the womb globally, over the past generation of the war on our posterity since the 1970’s — the US contribution being some 60 millions to date. This is by far the worst holocaust in history. One, that is currently mounting up at a million more victims per week. All, enabled by our silence or complicity in guilt of blood. Multiplied by, corruption of medicine, education, media, law, law enforcement, parliaments and cabinets, even — far too often — complicit clergy.

Second, because we need to reach out to millions of women who have been deceived, manipulated and misled into destroying their unborn children. Such, need to understand that God loves and graciously saves and cleanses all who will turn to him, to the point where the arch persecutor to death of the C1 church — who called himself the chief of sinners — became the greatest missionary of all time.

In which context, we need to de-spin so we can think straight:

straight_vs_spin[U/D: I now add a summary from Breithbart’s counter-rules in the face of Alinsky-cultural marxist agit-prop and ideological-cultural agendas:]

breitbartmanifesto

Third, because this matter is the mother cancer, the focal evil from which the perversion and tainting of hearts, lives, honourable professions, law, education, media, parliaments and cabinets has metastasised far and wide across our civilisation, a cancer that is now patently in fourth stage.

Only radical prophetic intervention that calls us back to sanity and soundness can turn us back from the brink, now — exactly what the holocaust enabling, civilisation-betraying media do not want us to even think about:

Of Lemmings, marches of folly and cliffs of self-falsifying absurdity . . .
Of Lemmings, marches of folly and cliffs of self-falsifying absurdity . . .

Last, but not least, because this is deeply connected to issues of our origins, the roots of mind and morality, and to the imposition of evolutionary materialistic scientism dressed up in a lab coat. Only by the supplanting and discrediting of the gospel, scriptures and churches under false colours of science, could such have come to pass. For, by enthroning evolutionary materialism, amorality and radical relativism reducing to might and/or manipulation make ‘right,’ ‘truth’ ‘worth’ and more have been let loose on our civilisation.

Indeed, that is not news, this is exactly what Plato warned against almost 2360 years ago now — speaking in the voice of the Athenian Stranger:

 

Ath [in The Laws, Bk X 2,350+ ya]. . . .[The avant garde philosophers and poets, c. 360 BC] say that fire and water, and earth and air [i.e the classical “material” elements of the cosmos], all exist by nature and chance, and none of them by art . . . [such that] all that is in the heaven, as well as animals and all plants, and all the seasons come from these elements, not by the action of mind, as they say, or of any God, or from art, but as I was saying, by nature and chance only [ –> that is, evolutionary materialism is ancient and would trace all things to blind chance and mechanical necessity] . . . .

[Thus, they hold] that the principles of justice have no existence at all in nature, but that mankind are always disputing about them and altering them; and that the alterations which are made by art and by law have no basis in nature, but are of authority for the moment and at the time at which they are made.-

[ –> Relativism, too, is not new; complete with its radical amorality rooted in a worldview that has no foundational IS that can ground OUGHT, leading to an effectively arbitrary foundation only for morality, ethics and law: accident of personal preference, the ebbs and flows of power politics, accidents of history and and the shifting sands of manipulated community opinion driven by “winds and waves of doctrine and the cunning craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming . . . ” cf a video on Plato’s parable of the cave; from the perspective of pondering who set up the manipulative shadow-shows, why.]

These, my friends, are the sayings of wise men, poets and prose writers, which find a way into the minds of youth. They are told by them that the highest right is might,

[ –> Evolutionary materialism — having no IS that can properly ground OUGHT — leads to the promotion of amorality on which the only basis for “OUGHT” is seen to be might (and manipulation: might in “spin”) . . . ]

and in this way the young fall into impieties, under the idea that the Gods are not such as the law bids them imagine; and hence arise factions [ –> Evolutionary materialism-motivated amorality “naturally” leads to continual contentions and power struggles influenced by that amorality at the hands of ruthless power hungry nihilistic agendas], these philosophers inviting them to lead a true life according to nature, that is,to live in real dominion over others [ –> such amoral and/or nihilistic factions, if they gain power, “naturally” tend towards ruthless abuse and arbitrariness . . . they have not learned the habits nor accepted the principles of mutual respect, justice, fairness and keeping the civil peace of justice, so they will want to deceive, manipulate and crush — as the consistent history of radical revolutions over the past 250 years so plainly shows again and again], and not in legal subjection to them [–> nihilistic will to power not the spirit of justice and lawfulness].

 

Yes, it is time for radical reformation. But for that to begin, we first have to face the truth, and we have to address the central evil of our time. END

 

Comments
UPDATE: I decided to add to the OP Breitbart's 13 counter-rules (to Alinsky's notorious list) and a link to a discussion of dealing with Alinsky-like "community organiser" assaults (as well as broader agit-prop) and the yet broader cultural marxist, critical studies, identity politics subversive agenda. Which is a key part of the driving force behind the global abortion holocaust. KFkairosfocus
January 28, 2017
January
01
Jan
28
28
2017
04:14 AM
4
04
14
AM
PDT
KF, very well spoken. Over the past century, an outpouring of spiritual phenomena has been recorded through Protestants, Greek Orthodox and Catholics. Vassula Ryden is a Greek Orthodox, I saw her when she came to England. http://www.tlig.co.uk/ While we are not obliged to believe, allegedly, St. Michael the Archangel revealed to Vassula that Satan is the hidden benefactor of abortion. If so, the following truth is horrible to contemplate. “your generation has drawn down punishments on themselves; your countries are infested by legions of unclean spirits that roam everywhere; Satan, today, is tempting even the elect of God; this is why trouble is coming to this generation who constructs its towers with innocent blood and founds its homelands on crime; this sacrifice alone pleases Satan…” (1), (October 14, 1994) In relation, Jesus had previously said, “which My Enemy, with his pen, will add and sign; his signature will be in blood taken from infants used for their murdering initiations, these initiations for his promotion!” (2), (October 3, 1994) Of course, her writings are controversial. Harsh words, as I would like to believe that no woman has an abortion with murderous intent. Still, the outcome is the physical death of a soul, but which is entitled to be resurrected through the death and love of Christ—the child’s divine creator who gave it a particle of his personal spirit to generate a living soul from its beginning. (We are not descendants of beasts or soulless beasts. God needs no intermediaries.) However, reportedly, lovingly and mercifully, Jesus said to an American mystic. “Pray for all those who have been involved in abortions. Yes, pray that they become reconciled with Me. Many stay away out of pride. Others do not return to Me for Satan has them bound by fear and guilt. But My arms are outstretched and filled with love and mercy. Pray that these souls are healed emotionally and spiritually. Pray for any who encourage abortion, or aid in the act itself. These too, My mercy calls. Many who submit to this heinous crime are being misled. Pray that hearts open to the truth.” (3) It appears spiritual warfare is the backdrop to this world which is reflected. Spiritual war that started at the very beginning. Jesus said Satan was a murderer and liar from the beginning (Jn 8:44). Of course, scripture does not really mean the real beginning as believed today, and we have the same number as the beast, 666 (Rev 13:18). KF posts, “800+ million unborn children have been slaughtered in the womb globally, over the past generation of the war on our posterity since the 1970’s — the US contribution being some 60 millions to date. This is by far the worst holocaust in history.” The times before Noah were also reportedly bad. Of course, that’s only a ‘tugboat’ type localised story which Jesus believed (Matt 24:37), and taking too much room up in Judaeo-Christian scripture. Nevertheless, spiritual terminations do more damage than a single physical abortion. Both need to be combated. Ref (1). Vassula Ryden, True Life in God, original handwriting edition (Independence, MO: Trinitas, 1995), vol. 8, pp. 217–218. (2). Ibid., pp. 188–189. (3). David L. Lynch, Our Lady of Guadalupe and her Missionary Image (St. Albans, VT: The Missionary Image of Our Lady of Guadalupe, Inc., 1996), p. 189.mw
January 28, 2017
January
01
Jan
28
28
2017
04:12 AM
4
04
12
AM
PDT
F/N: To give an idea as to what the scripturally based, Christian view on life in the womb looks like, let us look at a key passage in Luke:
Luke 1:26 In the sixth month [of Elizabeth's pregnancy] the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth, 27 to a virgin betrothed[b] to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. And the virgin's name was Mary. 28 And he came to her and said, “Greetings, O favored one, the Lord is with you!”[c] 29 But she was greatly troubled at the saying, and tried to discern what sort of greeting this might be. 30 And the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. 31 And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. 32 He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, 33 and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.” 34 And Mary said to the angel, “How will this be, since I am a virgin?”[d] 35 And the angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born[e] will be called holy—the Son of God. 36 And behold, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son, and this is the sixth month with her who was called barren. 37 For nothing will be impossible with God.” 38 And Mary said, “Behold, I am the servant[f] of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word.” And the angel departed from her. Mary Visits Elizabeth 39 In those days Mary arose and went with haste into the hill country, to a town in Judah, 40 and she entered the house of Zechariah and greeted Elizabeth. 41 And when Elizabeth heard the greeting of Mary, the baby leaped in her womb. And Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit, 42 and she exclaimed with a loud cry, “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb! 43 And why is this granted to me that the mother of my Lord should come to me? 44 For behold, when the sound of your greeting came to my ears, the baby in my womb leaped for joy. 45 And blessed is she who believed that there would be[g] a fulfillment of what was spoken to her from the Lord.” [ESV]
In Lukan writings, someone speaking filled with or under the power of the Spirit speaks for God, with his voice. Here, we see Jesus in the womb recognised as a unique presence by the inspiring Spirit, and by both Elizabeth and John the Baptist then some 5 1/2 months along in fetal development. Jesus, would at most have been 3 - 4 weeks, and indeed 2 weeks is more likely as Elizabeth was still in her sixth month of pregnancy. That is, on both sides of the viability threshold or the first trimester yardstick used in the awful Roe v Wade decision, there is recognition of spiritually present life in the womb. In no culture where such scriptural insights prevail would there be the sort of appalling holocaust as we have seen. Those who laboured long and hard, using evolutionism as their cultural battering ram, have much to answer for. KF PS: and those needing to look at the underlying warrant for the Gospel-based Christian faith, could start here.kairosfocus
January 28, 2017
January
01
Jan
28
28
2017
03:47 AM
3
03
47
AM
PDT
PS: Plato warns, again:
Ath [in The Laws, Bk X 2,350+ ya]. . . .[The avant garde philosophers and poets, c. 360 BC] say that fire and water, and earth and air [i.e the classical "material" elements of the cosmos], all exist by nature and chance, and none of them by art . . . [such that] all that is in the heaven, as well as animals and all plants, and all the seasons come from these elements, not by the action of mind, as they say, or of any God, or from art, but as I was saying, by nature and chance only [ --> that is, evolutionary materialism is ancient and would trace all things to blind chance and mechanical necessity] . . . . [Thus, they hold] that the principles of justice have no existence at all in nature, but that mankind are always disputing about them and altering them; and that the alterations which are made by art and by law have no basis in nature, but are of authority for the moment and at the time at which they are made.-
[ --> Relativism, too, is not new; complete with its radical amorality rooted in a worldview that has no foundational IS that can ground OUGHT, leading to an effectively arbitrary foundation only for morality, ethics and law: accident of personal preference, the ebbs and flows of power politics, accidents of history and and the shifting sands of manipulated community opinion driven by "winds and waves of doctrine and the cunning craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming . . . " cf a video on Plato's parable of the cave; from the perspective of pondering who set up the manipulative shadow-shows, why.]
These, my friends, are the sayings of wise men, poets and prose writers, which find a way into the minds of youth. They are told by them that the highest right is might,
[ --> Evolutionary materialism -- having no IS that can properly ground OUGHT -- leads to the promotion of amorality on which the only basis for "OUGHT" is seen to be might (and manipulation: might in "spin") . . . ]
and in this way the young fall into impieties, under the idea that the Gods are not such as the law bids them imagine; and hence arise factions [ --> Evolutionary materialism-motivated amorality "naturally" leads to continual contentions and power struggles influenced by that amorality at the hands of ruthless power hungry nihilistic agendas], these philosophers inviting them to lead a true life according to nature, that is,to live in real dominion over others [ --> such amoral and/or nihilistic factions, if they gain power, "naturally" tend towards ruthless abuse and arbitrariness . . . they have not learned the habits nor accepted the principles of mutual respect, justice, fairness and keeping the civil peace of justice, so they will want to deceive, manipulate and crush -- as the consistent history of radical revolutions over the past 250 years so plainly shows again and again], and not in legal subjection to them [--> nihilistic will to power not the spirit of justice and lawfulness].
kairosfocus
January 28, 2017
January
01
Jan
28
28
2017
03:32 AM
3
03
32
AM
PDT
TA, While somewhat tangential, a short answer is appropriate -- but dragging such a central and appalling issue off track trough the distract, distort, derail, denigrate, poison and polarise rhetorical pattern will not be entertained. UD generally provides balancing perspective in the face of extreme hostility and resistance to even the most patent truths (too often, to the point of refusal to admit such) sustained over many years as can readily be seen in the penumbra of attack sites; obviously not perfectly but on the whole fairly well. The degree of contentiousness, hostility and outright hate has sometimes mounted up to cyberstalking and on the ground stalking that has had to be drawn to the attention of police. (In my case there have been clear attempts to rob me of daily bread, and to implicitly threaten even fairly remote family.) UD has sustained a pattern of drawing attention to too often suppressed facts, concerns and issues, and -- as is so with the current thread -- has done so by pointing to evidence that is credible. As a result, it is now quite clear that the discovery of text in DNA in the heart of the cell, is a decisive sign of design of life, a manifestation of the wider pattern of functionally specific, complex organisation and/or associated information, FSCO/I. Further, it is clear that materialists in lab coats have advocated a self-refuting and amoral philosophy that is appallingly dangerous and destructive to our civilisation. Further to all this, cultural marxist agit prop tactics have now become major tools for imposing evolutionary materialism and/or fellow traveller ideologies and linked cultural agendas. Of which mass abortion under false colours of law, medicine and education is a capital example. It is finally quite clear that if such is not exposed, broken with and decisively turned from through radical reformation, our civilisation is heading over the cliff. KFkairosfocus
January 28, 2017
January
01
Jan
28
28
2017
03:28 AM
3
03
28
AM
PDT
KF Just for interest's sake, have you run your media analytical tool over the news coverage here at Uncommon Descent? If so, what were the results?timothya
January 28, 2017
January
01
Jan
28
28
2017
01:11 AM
1
01
11
AM
PDT
Dionisio & KF -- Thank you so much.ayearningforpublius
January 28, 2017
January
01
Jan
28
28
2017
01:06 AM
1
01
06
AM
PDT
PS: Newsbusters' bust of an Atlantic editorial rant against ultrasound scans that show just how human and alive babies are in utero, is revealing: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tom-blumer/2017/01/27/atlantic-issues-massive-correction-after-unhinged-anti-ultrasound-op --> I have now added a vid clip showing modern, 3-d ultrasound scans (some in motion) of babies in utero . . . direct scientific evidence, using 3-d imaging: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVB0qTiq5jU kairosfocus
January 27, 2017
January
01
Jan
27
27
2017
10:55 PM
10
10
55
PM
PDT
UPDATE: As this is an historic event in its own right, is at the pivot of the cultural conflict with inherently amoral evolutionary materialist scientism and exposes the Plato's Cave shadow show games in the major media, I have now revised the video inserts, to include: 1] MRC's 2 minute overview of the actual march 2] US VP Pence's speech 3] EWTN's full coverage. Let us use this as a point of reference from this time forth. KFkairosfocus
January 27, 2017
January
01
Jan
27
27
2017
10:33 PM
10
10
33
PM
PDT
ayearningforpublius @8: I understand you. [Luke 19:41; 3 John 4] Just pray for them and love them as they are. There's hope in Christ alone. When I was a teenager I was spiritually blind and lost. When my older child was a teenager I still was spiritually nearsighted and confused. Now I thank God for opening my spiritual eyes and giving me saving faith. Amazing grace!Dionisio
January 27, 2017
January
01
Jan
27
27
2017
06:36 PM
6
06
36
PM
PDT
KF, thank you for posting this.Dionisio
January 27, 2017
January
01
Jan
27
27
2017
06:28 PM
6
06
28
PM
PDT
I found another provocative quote by Hitchens posted on the Pro-Life Humanists website. Contributor Kristine Kruszelnicki set’s it up this way:
The late atheist author Christopher Hitchens, when asked in a January 2008 debate with Jay Wesley Richards whether he was opposed to abortion and was a member of the pro-life movement, replied: “I’ve had a lot of quarrels with some of my fellow materialists and secularists on this point, [but] I think that if the concept ‘child’ means anything, the concept ‘unborn child’ can be said to mean something. All the discoveries of embryology [and viability] – which have been very considerable in the last generation or so – appear to confirm that opinion, which I think should be innate in everybody. It’s innate in the Hippocratic Oath, it’s instinct in anyone who’s ever watched a sonogram. So ‘yes’ is my answer to that.”
Kruszelnicki’s blog post was a response to an article published by Marco Rosaire Rossi published “in the September/October edition [2012?*] of the The Humanist,” which questioned whether a humanist could rationally be pro-life. I found the following argument to be the most interesting:
Pointing to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in support of his position that “human beings as persons are born,” Mr. Rossi declared: “The fact of the matter is birth transforms us. It simultaneously makes us into individuals and members of a group, and thus embeds in us rights-bearing protections.” This claim is grossly fallacious. First, what is does not necessarily represent what should be. The fact that social conventions of personhood disregard the preborn human is no surprise, and in fact the very matter in dispute. Second, birth possesses no such magical powers of transformation. At birth a developing human changes location… In fact, bio-ethicist Peter Singer agrees with the pro-lifer on this point. He argues: “The pro-life groups were right about one thing, the location of the baby inside or outside the womb cannot make much of a moral difference. We cannot coherently hold it is alright to kill a fetus a week before birth, but as soon as the baby is born everything must be done to keep it alive.” (Singer then goes on to argue that since there is no significant difference between a late-term fetus and a newborn, infanticide is thereby justified.) Birth is undoubtedly a significant moment in our lives, but it is not our first moment.
http://www.prolifehumanists.org/secular-case-against-abortion/ While I still doubt Humanism or secular progressivism provides a sufficient foundation for interpersonal moral obligation and universal human rights, I found Ms. Kruszelnicki’s reasoning to be quite solid. Beginning with empirically based premises that I believe most pro-lifers can agree with, she develops a number of very good arguments. For those theist’s who have spent some time engaging atheists on this site, I think you’ll find her post to be quite refreshing-- if you get my drift. *footnote: Kruszelnicki’s blog post is dated May 2013.john_a_designer
January 27, 2017
January
01
Jan
27
27
2017
03:47 PM
3
03
47
PM
PDT
John C Wright gives us food for thought: http://www.scifiwright.com/2017/01/the-last-crusade/#more-17557kairosfocus
January 27, 2017
January
01
Jan
27
27
2017
03:29 PM
3
03
29
PM
PDT
AYP, may God grant grace. KFkairosfocus
January 27, 2017
January
01
Jan
27
27
2017
03:25 PM
3
03
25
PM
PDT
Things have turned around radically in my own family's life. Back in the early 1980s we discovered that young teen age girls could be removed from the public schools in California and taken to an abortion clinic -- with no parental notification or permission. We then took our 13 year old daughter out of public school and put her into a Christian school where she finished out high school. Now -- just this past week -- that same daughter took her 14 year old daughter to the Women's March in Washington DC. That's my granddaughter, and it saddens me greatly.ayearningforpublius
January 27, 2017
January
01
Jan
27
27
2017
01:31 PM
1
01
31
PM
PDT
Thank you, KF, for making it so easy to access the live stream. This is a very special event. Also, Thank you JAD @ 6. I was unaware of Hitchens' comments.Truth Will Set You Free
January 27, 2017
January
01
Jan
27
27
2017
01:16 PM
1
01
16
PM
PDT
The late Christopher Hitchens believed there were scientific as well as morally objective reasons for opposing abortion.
“I do, as a humanist, believe that the concept “unborn child” is a real one and I think the concept is underlined by all the recent findings of embryology about the early viability of a well conceived human baby, one that isn’t going to be critically deformed (or even some that are) will be able to survive outside the womb earlier and earlier, and earlier and I see that date only being pushed back. I feel the responsibility to consider the occupant of the womb as a candidate member of society in the future, and thus to say that it cannot be only the responsibility of the woman to decide upon it, that it’s a social question and an ethical and a moral one. And I say this as someone who has no supernatural belief.” (emphasis added)
http://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org/news/2014/09/atheist-christopher-hitchens-on-abortion/#.WIukzfkrLgx Here is the context for the quote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8HhTKzmvasjohn_a_designer
January 27, 2017
January
01
Jan
27
27
2017
12:12 PM
12
12
12
PM
PDT
There are some really good speeches on this live stream today!!Silver Asiatic
January 27, 2017
January
01
Jan
27
27
2017
09:51 AM
9
09
51
AM
PDT
Many thanks kf and UD, for bringing us to the attention of the day’s marches to stop abortion. A miraculous image of a pregnant woman resides in the Basilica of Guadalupe. One of three totally separate and apparently miraculous images held by the Catholic Church. On Saturday, December 9, 1531, Juan Diego, a Mexican peasant, witnessed a miraculous event at the top of a hill; a white cloud surrounded by a rainbow with a brilliant light shining from the cloud, out of which appeared a woman. She asked for a temple to be built: no small matter for a peasant devoid of influence. Ref. Our Lady of Guadalupe and her Missionary Image by Daniel J Lynch (St Albans Vermont, 1996). He then went off to see the Bishop, who shall we say was hesitant to believe him. Juan Diego returned to Tepeyac, (or the hill of Tepeyac), Mexico. Again, he witnessed a miraculous event. The woman basically told him to have another go. The Bishop told him that he needed a sign. However, this time Juan decided he had enough and went around the hill. However, his path was again interrupted by the woman who identified herself in the image of his own kind. She did indeed leave a sign. She told him to climb the hill and pick roses (this was in the middle of winter), where he found in bloom Castilian roses. The roses were the sign that the Bishop had requested. For the third time, he went to the Bishop. “To Juan’s astonishment, the Bishop fell to his knees.” Juan followed the Bishop’s eyes to his tilma (a tilma was a cloak Juan wore): printed on the cloak an image of the woman that Juan saw. The woman had addressed herself as follows; “Know for certain, dearest of my sons, that I am the perfect and perpetual Virgin Mary, Mother of the True God, through whom everything lives, the Lord of all things, who is Master of heaven and earth.” The image ended human sacrifice at the time, replacing the Aztec false mother got, Tonantzin. The Aztecs reportedly killed 80,000 people in a four-day orgy in 1487 when they dedicated a new temple in Mexico City to their false god Huitzilopochtli (“deity of war, the sun, and human sacrifice.”) The stars which she wore on her mantle in the image; with the moon, upon which she stood, appears to depict the conquering of Quetzalcoatl the stone serpent idol. (Quetzalcóatl, Mayan name Kukulcán, (from Nahuatl quetzalli, “tail feather of the quetzal bird [Pharomachrus mocinno],” and coatl, “snake”), the Feathered Serpent, one of the major deities of the ancient Mexican pantheon. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Quetzalcoatl) The Indians understood that they were not adoring the image but honouring her as the pregnant virgin mother of the God-Man. Today, some people would like to destroy the image on the tilma. “In 1921, an anti-clerical activist hid a bomb containing 29 sticks of dynamite in a pot of roses and placed it before the image inside the Basilica of Guadalupe. When the bomb exploded, most everything from the marble altar rail & floor just feet away from the blast, to windows 150 meters away were broken…yet the image and the glass surrounding it remained untouched.” http://mtncatholic.com/2014/12/11/4-literally-awesome-facts-about-our-lady-of-guadalupe/ A substitute image was made which is also carried in public witnesses against abortion. Miraculous events are also reported. The Missionary Image cried tears of oil on Christmas 1995 in Our Lady of Grace Church Colchester, Vermont. (p 106A). A solar phenomenon occurred on June 9, 1991, over Mexico City when the first Missionary Image left for Central America. “This was witnessed by millions” (Reuters/Betmann Newsphotos) (p 105). An apparent Host appeared above Our Lady’s fingertips (p 105). A woman who had four abortions said: “I believe that Our Lady of Guadalupe will heal all those who have been wounded by the grave sin of abortion…” (p 106D). In the book by DJ Lynch, it says that abortion will end, but in God’s time. Pray this comes soon; pray for healing of all those involved by asking for healing and forgiveness. The fear of the realisation of what has occurred may run deep.mw
January 27, 2017
January
01
Jan
27
27
2017
08:44 AM
8
08
44
AM
PDT
Thanks, KF.
...complicity in guilt of blood ...
This a sad aspect which drives the cover-up and fear of the truth of this matter. As you said elsewhere, people need to bring this guilt to God for forgiveness and redemption, otherwise the acts of self-blinding and covering it over will lead to irrationality and sometimes violent reactions (the violence of abortion meeting the violence of hostility).Silver Asiatic
January 27, 2017
January
01
Jan
27
27
2017
05:18 AM
5
05
18
AM
PDT
Live streaming the 44th annual March for Life, today, January 27, 2017.kairosfocus
January 27, 2017
January
01
Jan
27
27
2017
03:11 AM
3
03
11
AM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply