Denyse O'Leary
Fruit flies learn to count?
In recent museum exhibit of dinosaurs, plate tectonics dominates, not Darwinism
Scientists, including evolutionary biologists, carry coffin through streets in Canada, to protest cuts to funding?
Attention Darwin’s male fishwives: We’re on to you. And it’s not working.
Darwinism explains why the Big Bang didn’t need God
Science writer starts “Not a Chimp” blog
New Theism’s Michael Dowd has the spiritual authority of a carnival barker.
Nothing would benefit chimpanzees more than a healthy dose of creationism in science.
He said it: John Lennox on why Darwinism doesn’t require evidence
In the contemporary scientific world we thus have the very unusual situation that one of science’s most influential theories, biological macroevolution, stands in such a close relationship to naturalistic philosophy that it can be deduced from it directly – that is, without even needing to consider any evidence, as the ancient arguments of Lucretius plainly show. This circumstance is extraordinary since it is very difficult to think of another scientific theory that is in a similar position. (Page 98) – John Lennox, quoted in Amanda Read, “Darwinocracy: The evolution question in American politics” (Washington Times, September 3, 2011). Oxford mathematician John Lennox is the author of God’s Undertaker: Has Science Buried God?. Here’s an interview with him.