Thoughts on Stephen Barr’s theistic Darwinism: If God can load the dice so cleverly that no evidence would reveal it …
Continuing major media circulation collapse: Implications for ID
Memo re BioLogos: We are waiting for answers that will likely never come …
Bayesian thinking – and trusting one’s gut
Baboons taught to recognize words? Check the fine print.
Moran’s history of the Darwin vs. design culture wars mostly leaves OUT both ASA and ID?
Yes, a Catholic can be a young Earth creationist in good faith
Roger Scruton: “first major outbreak of a new academic disease, which one might call ‘neuroenvy’.”
Memo to Sal Cordova: Massimo Pigliucci may be in transit
Overheard in a coffee shop: Reasons why an African American might go nuts in evolution class
Difference between humans and animals has been identified?
Primate expert offers advice for motherhood – cooperative breeding
Bill Dembski on why ID’s struggle is going to be long and hard
Question for Barry: Why do people embrace Darwin today, when his cause is actually collapsing in science?
Who in their right mind would be a Darwinist in science today – if they had a free choice – in the face of lateral gene transfer and epigenetics? In “First Things: From Part of the Solution to Part of the Problem,” Barry Arrington tells a familiar story: How media – First Things is his example – start out opposing destructive cultural trends, and end up capitulating to them. How else can one explain the suggestion that Darwinism is compatible with Christianity, fronted today in First Things? Not only isn’t Darwinism compatible with traditional Christianity but no one who really understood it ever supposed that it was. As I have often pointed out here, the Catholic journalists of a century Read More ›