William Dembski
“Smithsonian to Screen a Movie That Makes a Case Against Evolution”
Smithsonian to Screen a Movie That Makes a Case Against EvolutionBy JOHN SCHWARTZ, as reported in the NYTimesPublished: May 28, 2005 The Discovery Institute, a group in Seattle that supports an alternative theory, “intelligent design,” is announcing on its Web site that it and the director of the [Smithsonian] museum “are happy to announce the national premiere and private evening reception” on June 23 for the movie, “The Privileged Planet: The Search for Purpose in the Universe.” For full story go here.
Allen Orr in the New Yorker — A Response
Dutch Cabinet Supports Discussion of ID
Eshel Ben-Jacob — Someone You Should Know
American Spectator Defends ID
The Little Engine That Could… Undo Darwinism
By Dan Peterson
What critics of Intelligent Design theory can’t accept is that its proponents are making scientific, fact-based arguments.
The American Spectator, June 2005
Read More ›Frank Schaeffer — Nowhere Near His Father’s Footsteps
“Design proponents take movement to Web”
The following report by Science & Theology News discusses blogging for ID: http://www.stnews.org/articles.php?article_id=549&category=news.
Ken Keller contra ID
“Students who cannot handle scientific challenges to their faith should seek guidance from a theologian, not a scientist.”
“Having Fun with Intelligent Design”
Here’s a novel, if perverse, take on why the teaching of ID should be encouraged: http://www.alternet.org/story/22039.
Powers of Ten
Have a look at the video at the following site: http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/primer/java/scienceopticsu/powersof10/index.html. Is there any design-theoretic significance that on a logarithmic size-scale, we’re close to the middle of the known physical universe? Regardless of the answer to this question or whether there even is an answer, you’re in for a treat if you haven’t seen such a “power of ten” video in the past.
Two Gifts for Richard Dawkins
Allen Orr’s Piece in the New Yorker
Allen Orr’s article against ID is now out in the New Yorker (go here). It’s as bad as I thought it would be. I’m on the road right now but will comment on it later in the week. Note that I remarked last week on this blog that a fact-checker from the New Yorker had contacted me about this article. It doesn’t appear that the time I spent with this fact-checker did much to improve this article.