Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community
Category

Science

BREAKING: Possible Neutrinos moving at superluminal speeds at CERN!

When I was a kid and was bored in Chem classes I would occasionally daydream of a messenger arriving at the classroom door to tell the late, great, Fr Farrell of a scientific breakthrough. Of course, in later years, I always assumed that it would be years before a breakthrough would filter down to High School Chem. But, today, may be a possible day like that. According to a BBC report from CERN (HT, WUWT): Neutrinos sent through the ground from Cern toward the Gran Sasso laboratory 732km away seemed to show up a tiny fraction of a second early. The result – which threatens to upend a century of physics – will be put online for scrutiny by other Read More ›

He said it: Present-day science cannot speak for future science

  The inherent unpredictability of future scientific developments—the fact that no secure inference can be drawn from one state of science to another—has important implications for the issue of the limits of science. It means that present-day science cannot speak for future science: it is in principle impossible to make any secure inferences from the substance of science at one time about its substance at a significantly different time. The prospect of future scientific revolutions can never be precluded. We cannot say with unblinking confidence what sorts of resources and conceptions the science of the future will or will not use. Given that it is effectively impossible to predict the details of what future science will accomplish, it is no Read More ›

Cudworth, Dennis Venema’s Christian Darwinism is an alarming symptom – but only a symptom – of a much bigger problem

Christian universities are prone to the treachery of mediocrity. Central to the witness of far too many of them is born-again profs who sound just like materialist atheists, if you overlook the Jesus jaw. Read More ›

If you’re questioning science dogma today, no need to feel lonely … some scientists even question the diet docs

Many skeptics are simply people who can count, who realize that metabolisms are very complex, involving a number of inputs. Put another way: Yes, the Second Law of Thermodynamics is true - but so are a lot of other things that go into the final figure. Read More ›