Further to “Breaking: PZ Myers is now a “creationist”: If everybody is a creationist, nobody is.
Follow UD News at Twitter!
Serving The Intelligent Design Community
Further to “Breaking: PZ Myers is now a “creationist”: If everybody is a creationist, nobody is.
Follow UD News at Twitter!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
It shouldn’t be retired but it also shouldn’t be applied to everyone who believes in God, either. I can believe in creation without believing in a literal interpretation of Genesis. The terms “creationist” and “creationism” are generally used when discussing fundamentalist religions, those who do interpret Genesis literally.
The term “creationist” is misleading at best. It is used by those who want to distort the issues in the life/cosmology origins debate.
So I suggest we ban it at UD except to refer to those who want it to apply it to themselves. In a sense anyone who believes that there is a God who created the world is a creationist and as such the word then has no meaning in any debate.
I have found the term creationist now means anyone that is skeptical of or disagee’s with Darwinian dogma, be it RM, NS, common descent, tree of life or a wide range of Darwinian myths and fantasies in between.
This is why, much to their horror and disgust, dissenting atheists have been branded creationist too.
If we are all creationists does that mean we can all get along?
Should Atheist creationists be called Atheationists?
Even Darwinists are little c creationists, they just believe that the power of creation lies in an impersonal unguided “force.” How absurd is that?
Creationist is a good word as it powerfully says the universe and life was created by a thinking being. So God.
The speciation is fixed with other qualifying terms.
since evolutionists really do take on God and not just genesis then a unity under the creationist term is worthy to keep.
I suppose everyone is a creationist in some sense. Even atheists who believe nothing created everything have nothing as their creator.
But I tend to think Barb’s guideline above should be the one used to identify creationists when no other criteria are applied, i.e. those who take Genesis literally. This gets rid of nutcases like PZ Myers, who wouldn’t be invited to a creationist dinner party even if he said he’d sit at a table on his own.
as to:
More so than even atheists realize:
i.e. Seeing purpose in nature is an innate ‘God given’ ability. An ability without which it would be impossible to do science,,
That ‘everyone is a creationist’, even atheists, is also revealed by the fact that atheists sweat when they dare God:
i.e. if atheist truly believed God was imaginary, why should they sweat if they dare Him? Indeed why should they have a tendency to be so angry at Him in the first place:
Verse and Music