Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Leon Wieseltier on letting the intellectuals decide everything

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Here, contemplating The New Republic’s centenary:

A few years after Walter Lippmann propounded his mandarin skepticism about the reliance of a progressive society upon the wayward minds of the masses, his admirer Edward Bernays produced one of the most illuminating and most chilling American books of the twentieth century. It was called Propaganda, which it extolled. “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society,” it began. “Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.” Bernays was writing in admiration of these “invisible governors.” He continued: “In theory, every citizen makes up his mind on public questions and matters of private conduct. In practice, if all men had to study for themselves the abstruse economic, political, and ethical data involved in every question, they would find it impossible to come to a conclusion without anything. We have voluntarily agreed to let an invisible government sift the data and high-spot the outstanding issues so that our field of choice shall be narrowed to practical proportions.” Bernays proceeded to devise various techniques for the functioning of the invisible government, and in a long and colorful career he became known as the father of public relations. He saw no significant difference between politics and commerce, and agitated for commerce to become as cunning about its self-interested strategies as politics. In his day, or so he complained, corporations lagged behind politicians in venality. They soon caught up. (Bernays’ book has been rediscovered in contemporary China, where it suits the glittering and gruesome experiment in authoritarian capitalism.)

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
Yes conclusions run societies. Yes those who control/influence conclusions change/run society. The greatest, after christ and disciples etc, was martin luther. Yet marx also. the public draws its opinions and conclusions based on information upon presumptions of conclusions. A protestant civilization is different from others based on conclusions even if now they are forgotten as originally protestant conclusions. nobody controls the people. The people have no excuse about invisible governors. no governors but only persuaders. No problem in a free nation. Society simply is a contact sport. Intellectuals never mattered in North america. If so name one!Robert Byers
November 16, 2014
November
11
Nov
16
16
2014
10:51 PM
10
10
51
PM
PDT
RalphDavidWestfall @ 7
@Seversky: “other bodies – not at all invisible – which for better or worse save people the trouble of having to think things out for themselves. They’re called religions.” Actually the word ideology is the encompassing category.
I can live with that. The problem is not so much with religion or atheist political ideology as it is with human weakness. The old saw tells us "absolute power corrupts absolutely". When people come to believe that they are in possession of some Absolute Truth, there is a real danger of being seduced by The Dark Side, of coming to believe that you are entitled by that knowledge to do anything in furthering its influence in society. That's when bad things can start to happen.Seversky
November 16, 2014
November
11
Nov
16
16
2014
11:21 AM
11
11
21
AM
PDT
@Seversky: "other bodies – not at all invisible – which for better or worse save people the trouble of having to think things out for themselves. They’re called religions." Actually the word ideology is the encompassing category. I discovered the dangers of uncritically adopting others' views by hard experience early in my Christian life. Learning that distinction has been a great blessing to me and also beneficial to people close to me. Not to mention that there are anti-theistic ideologies, as well as religious ones, whose effects can be comparably noxious.RalphDavidWestfall
November 16, 2014
November
11
Nov
16
16
2014
12:57 AM
12
12
57
AM
PDT
News, Everything that goes out over the airwaves in the US is tracked in time by the Nielsen Company. Program schedules are loaded into Nielsen's global database prior to the date of broadcast by every individual broadcast licensee in the nation. If liquid daily events cause that schedule to deviate by more that 3.5 minutes in any 15 minute period, that deviation needs to be recorded. And if we want our data to be clean and our research to reflect actual conditions, then it falls on people like me to occasionally go into the database and make those changes. On the 4th of November we had a national election, in which the Republicans are perceived to have had a big victory over our Democratic President and his policies. This prompted a presidential "response" on the following day on the 5th. This is where the White House will request time from the broadcasters to cover the Press Conference with a live "Special Report", giving the President an opportunity to politically position this perceived turn of events. I logged on to Nielsen's database on the 6th to adjust the schedules for my particular acronym, and started looking through the discrepancy reports for the correct times to adjust, as I have done countless times over the years. Special Reports like these might run 6 minutes, or 8 minutes, or if there is more substance than just a comment or two for the news cycle, then perhaps they might run 12 minutes or even 15 or 17 minutes. On an occasion where we are going to do some analysis following the presser, it might even run 22 or even 25. In this instance, I looked to find out that our nation's acronyms broke in at 1:55 and stayed with it until 3:21 - a one hour and 26 minute positioning statement by the White House following the results of an election (with it perceived political results). Just Wow. It must be a modern record. Perhaps I'll look it up. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - side note: Sometimes I read the comments to these types of posts, and have to shake my head. Some people speak with such certainty, like they have their finger on it all. More often than not, IMO, they have no idea what they are talking about.Upright BiPed
November 16, 2014
November
11
Nov
16
16
2014
12:21 AM
12
12
21
AM
PDT
Well the "Invisible Government" seems to be growing increasingly irrelevant as time goes by. It looks to me like they were blindsided by affordable computers, the internet, and open source software. They've lost their defacto monopoly on filtering information. So we almost have a free market for information. The price is that we have to filter our own information.Edward
November 15, 2014
November
11
Nov
15
15
2014
07:25 PM
7
07
25
PM
PDT
The thing that never seems to occur to progressives, is that this "invisible government" that they implicitly think is theirs by birthright, might just possibly be using them as "useful idiots". They think they are pulling the strings, until the real string puller doesn't need them anymore. Stalin was chosen by his Bolshevik invisible government masters because they thought him stupid and uneducated. We all know how that choice worked out. As Friedrich Hayek put it--if you concentrate power in the hands of a few, then it will attract ruthless and power-hungry people as honey to flies. The real idiots in this case, are progressives who think government and media is a benign tool to manipulate the masses. Strangely, the smartest man is the one who puts his trust in something outside mankind itself, who doesn't try to ride the tiger of positive feedback amplification.Robert Sheldon
November 15, 2014
November
11
Nov
15
15
2014
04:25 PM
4
04
25
PM
PDT
There are, of course, other bodies - not at all invisible - which for better or worse save people the trouble of having to think things out for themselves. They're called religions.Seversky
November 15, 2014
November
11
Nov
15
15
2014
04:16 PM
4
04
16
PM
PDT
no fault divorce gay marriage abortion evolution What organization believes in the above? a) The Catholic Church b) The Muslim religion c) The Protestant religion d) the vast majority of the press The answer is d), the invisible government - those that control the supply of information to the broader public. Or as Doctor Who elegantly said: He who controls the distribution of information, controls society.Peter
November 15, 2014
November
11
Nov
15
15
2014
03:55 PM
3
03
55
PM
PDT
“Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.In theory, every citizen makes up his mind on public questions and matters of private conduct. In practice, if all men had to study for themselves the abstruse economic, political, and ethical data involved in every question, they would find it impossible to come to a conclusion without anything. We have voluntarily agreed to let an invisible government sift the data and high-spot the outstanding issues so that our field of choice shall be narrowed to practical proportions." Shorter: Fox Newsvelikovskys
November 15, 2014
November
11
Nov
15
15
2014
03:29 PM
3
03
29
PM
PDT

Leave a Reply