Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Cambrian Explosion Caught on Film

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

An explosion is coming: a devastating blast against Darwinism in the form of a dynamite new film from Illustra Media: Darwin’s Dilemma: The Mystery of the Cambrian Fossil Record. The Cambrian explosion, which Darwin admitted was the greatest challenge to his theory, has not been solved in the 150 years since The Origin.  In fact, it has gotten much worse.  This film does more than demolish a defunct idea.  It offers the only alternative that does explain the sudden appearance of all the animal phyla: intelligent design.

The content and delivery are both outstanding–the interviews with Paul Nelson, Jonathan Wells, Steve Meyer, Doug Axe, Paul Chien and Richard Sternberg all deliver an irrefutable case for ID.  Cambrian experts Simon Conway Morris and James Valentine are treated respectfully.  The case builds and accelerates toward the end with so many independent arguments, poor Darwin is just left mumbling at the end, “I can give no satisfactory answer.”   (This is not exactly the party he wanted on his 200th birthday, but history and the facts of science have more important work to do. )

The film is also visually beautiful (watch the trailer).  Majestic scenes of the Canadian Rockies alternate with vivid new animations of Cambrian animals.  This film has more original animations than any previous Illustra project, all detailed and credible.  The entire production is edited with Illustra’s trademark finesse, and powerfully enhanced by another original score by Mark Lewis, one of the most creative musicians in film.  It’s a work of art as much as a documentary.

The film is due for release on Sept. 15 (see order page).  Once in distribution, it completes a very powerful trilogy by Illustra on the case for intelligent design and the demise of Darwinism, coming from three independent directions.  Unlocking the Mystery of Life delivered the left hook from biology.  The Privileged Planet delivered the right punch from astronomy.  And now, Darwin’s Dilemma is the pile driver from paleontology, leaving Darwin’s legacy buried in the rocks, where it will fossilize for the museums of a more enlightened age.

Comments
16 DATCG
I would say DITTOS to that!tsmith
August 27, 2009
August
08
Aug
27
27
2009
07:08 AM
7
07
08
AM
PDT
Excellent work guys. Congrats to everyone involved at Illustra Media and all associated with this important endeavor to fight back in the media with truth. And thanks to David Coppedge for all you do. You do a fantastic job at Creation Safaris. I recommend everyone curious about the truth of current science and published papers check his site. He rolls out information almost daily now for how long? He points out the hypocrisy, the inconsistency, the unscientific story-telling and the outright lunacy at times by materialist and atheist who struggle to hold onto their Darwinian religion. Creation Safaris The millions of dollars in grant money David gets from the government sure gives him to much power. Its just not fair to the Darwinist that one man have so much power. You should be censored like Dr. Sternberg. Where are the Orwellian Thought minders and fascist when we need them? Hello, NCSE?DATCG
August 27, 2009
August
08
Aug
27
27
2009
04:56 AM
4
04
56
AM
PDT
BillB:
Changing oxygen levels might have had something to do with it.
What are you talking about? No matter what material explanation you pursue, it will come to nothing. See how much time I saved you? And they call ID a science stopper! ;) In seriousness, it's a good question why the explosion, so far as we can tell, took any time at all. The fact that it occurred over millions of years suggests that the designer used material means anyway (like adding oxygen to the atmosphere) or at least means that can be described logically. Edson:
if existence of life has a purpose, and if consciousness has a purpose, than human society has a purpose… If the designer of these things have proven so intelligent in his previous projects, would he let humanity to be a failure?
That's a very interesting question if taken non-rhetorically. How do we know, one way or the other? If one believes in the Fall as a cause of evil on Earth, then in a sense, the creator already let humankind "be a failure". In any case, what does the "purpose"/"meaning" of something have to do with whether it was created by a being? Wouldn't anything with complex emotions and thoughts have purpose in any given universe? Conversely, if I created a universe from scratch, would I get to make up its "purpose"? Ignore for this question that I can't create a universe from scratch, and that I myself was created (in the telic view of things).Lenoxus
August 27, 2009
August
08
Aug
27
27
2009
04:31 AM
4
04
31
AM
PDT
Lenoxus, Changing oxygen levels might have had something to do with it. Oxygen is very good for energetic reactions and having plenty of it helps if you want to build complex energy consuming bodies. --- Q: Someone wanted diverse life to appear on Earth within a relatively short amount of time. B: Why?BillB
August 27, 2009
August
08
Aug
27
27
2009
12:47 AM
12
12
47
AM
PDT
Precisely.IRQ Conflict
August 26, 2009
August
08
Aug
26
26
2009
08:41 PM
8
08
41
PM
PDT
Q: Why did so much diverse life appear on Earth within such a relatively short amount of time? A: Someone wanted it to.Lenoxus
August 26, 2009
August
08
Aug
26
26
2009
07:22 PM
7
07
22
PM
PDT
Sure, Gildodgen.
I'm sorry folks, but the hypotheses are wrong and the evidence is right."
The problem is that our society is sunk too deep in materialism and freedom to accept design and, consequently, to consider again the dread possibility of being watched from outside. It seems like many people feel protected by assertions like "Keep on, folks. Spirituality is just illusion, tradition, anything but reality, hence, it's nothing which may change your liberty to draw your own principles". By the way, why do the "quantum inner god" ideas apparently acquire better acceptance? Finally, aren't we reaching times when dramatic changes can be seen in the horizon? I mean, if existence of life has a purpose, and if consciousness has a purpose, than human society has a purpose... If the designer of these things have proven so intelligent in his previous projects, would he let humanity to be a failure? Or should he make known (or have made known) his directives for a peaceful world? As more people recognize ID as reality, spirituality will not stand as mere tradition forever. People will be seeking spirituality as they seek knowledge. And well, we know multiple *realities* don't co-exist. So, times may be coming when we will converge to a final and unique understanding of the way of living which was intended to the designed humanity, and, in an ideal scenario, divisions between people will have no place anymore. Well, I think this would be an even greater demonstration of intelligence of the designer than the making of life and universe, and everybody would inevitably bow down in awe before him. Sorry for my bad English and for getting off the topic. :0) Regards.Edson
August 26, 2009
August
08
Aug
26
26
2009
07:19 PM
7
07
19
PM
PDT
Jerry, That was called "the voyage which shook the World" It is a documentary about Darwin's voyage to South America. I saw the film and can recommend it. Apparently he was a geologist at first and was heavily influenced by Lyell's uniformitarian geology which coloured his thinking about biology.mad doc
August 26, 2009
August
08
Aug
26
26
2009
04:33 PM
4
04
33
PM
PDT
Whether it be the fine-tuning of the laws of the universe for life, the complex, error-detecting-and-repairing, information-processing machinery of the cell, or the overwhelming, persistent, and undeniable testimony of the fossil record that new life forms appear suddenly, persist for a while, and then disappear only to be replaced by another discontinuous biological saltation (except for sharks and some other creatures, which mysteriously never evolved), the battle cry of the materialist and Darwinist is always the same: "Our hypotheses are correct. The evidence is wrong. Just give us more time and we'll prove it to you." I'm sorry folks, but the hypotheses are wrong and the evidence is right.GilDodgen
August 26, 2009
August
08
Aug
26
26
2009
04:29 PM
4
04
29
PM
PDT
Wasn't there another film about Darwin that was being produced in Australia? Or is this the same thing? This looks different from the other one discussed here a couple months ago.jerry
August 26, 2009
August
08
Aug
26
26
2009
04:06 PM
4
04
06
PM
PDT
Billb,
David, how long did the explosion last?
No doubt at least 3 orders of magnitude greater than the age of the earth according to Paul Nelson, who is featured in the film.yakky d
August 26, 2009
August
08
Aug
26
26
2009
03:43 PM
3
03
43
PM
PDT
Wow! I just watched the trailer. It's so beautiful, it's scary. It's great to see that science is not the exclusive domain of Darwinists, atheists and materialists as some have been desperately trying to promote. I sense a coming explosion of a different kind, a paradigm shifting explosion a la Thomas Kuhn. I sense excitement in the air for some and gloom for some others. PS. to moderators: Por favor, release me from my shackles.Mapou
August 26, 2009
August
08
Aug
26
26
2009
03:32 PM
3
03
32
PM
PDT
David, how long did the explosion last?BillB
August 26, 2009
August
08
Aug
26
26
2009
03:13 PM
3
03
13
PM
PDT
Learned Hand, Does your question mean that you're just trying to stir up trouble on this forum or that you simply fail to see the pathetic state in which Darwin's theory finds itself, independent of ID or the culture wars?kibitzer
August 26, 2009
August
08
Aug
26
26
2009
03:03 PM
3
03
03
PM
PDT
It offers the only alternative that does explain the sudden appearance of all the animal phyla: intelligent design. Does that mean that it documents original research, or new discoveries by IDists? Or is this just another salvo in the culture wars?Learned Hand
August 26, 2009
August
08
Aug
26
26
2009
02:49 PM
2
02
49
PM
PDT
Oops, I guess I should have said 'nothing' is a problem for evolution.IRQ Conflict
August 26, 2009
August
08
Aug
26
26
2009
02:48 PM
2
02
48
PM
PDT
Awsome! Can't wait for this! "This documentary will examine what many consider to be the most powerful refutation of Darwinian evolution—the Cambrian fossil record." Note: This will NOT be a "problem" for true believers of evolution. lol. Because, nothing ever is. Or will be for that matter.IRQ Conflict
August 26, 2009
August
08
Aug
26
26
2009
02:46 PM
2
02
46
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply