Evolution Intelligent Design News

From a study of lungfish: An explanation of mermaids

Spread the love

From “Lungfish Provides Insight to Life On Land: ‘Humans Are Just Modified Fish’” ScienceDaily (October 7, 2011), we learn:

“We examined the way the different fish species generated the muscles of their pelvic fins, which are the evolutionary forerunners of the hind limbs,” said Professor Currie, a developmental biologist. Currie and his team genetically engineered the fish to trace the migration of precursor muscle cells in early developmental stages as the animal’s body took shape. These cells in the engineered fish were made to emit a red or green light, allowing the team to track the development of specific muscle groups. They found that the bony fish had a different mechanism of pelvic fin muscle formation from that of the cartilaginous fish, a mechanism that was a stepping stone to the evolution of tetrapod physiology.

Neat experiment, demonstrating the generally held position that bony fish are closer to tetrapods. But note the conclusion:

“Humans are just modified fish,” said Professor Currie. “The genome of fish is not vastly different from our own. We have shown that the mechanism of pelvic muscle formation in bony fish is transitional between that in sharks and in our tetrapod ancestors.”

Yeah, that explains mermaids.

We’re waiting for the paper that uses this data to show why guys are more likely to be attracted to mermaids than sharks.

5 Replies to “From a study of lungfish: An explanation of mermaids

  1. 1
    wd400 says:

    Really, is there a point the “News”? At all?

  2. 2
    bornagain77 says:

    wd400, sorry Charlie, Starkist likes tuna that taste good, not tuna with good taste! 🙂

    http://online.wsj.com/media/me.....103729.jpg

  3. 3
    Acipenser says:

    news, you’ve confused a media interview response with the conclusions of the actual research article and the data it presents.

  4. 4
    News says:

    No, the whole point of the story was that punchline. Otherwise, the find is of marginal significance in the scheme of things. Dpon’t pretend you don’t know. Most of the media bark the line unashamedly.

  5. 5
    Acipenser says:

    marginal significance? A more realistic interpretation of the data from the study is another addition to the mound of evidence in support of universal common descent.

    As for barking the line unashamedly you posted and incresed the distribution of the information…thanks!

Leave a Reply