Further to “Science mag admits, DNA studies shake tree of animal life, ”noting a Nautilus story, the moderator appeared briefly among the so far 171 approved comments to announce,
Hey all. Nautilus Moderator here. This is a science magazine, and our comments section isn’t the place to debate whether evolution is true. Consider this thread closed.
Wow. Stephen Hawking can cast doubt on black holes in Nature, but following an article that makes nonsense of standard evolution claims in Nautilus, readers are not permitted to discuss “whether evolution is true.”
Oh please. Like we said earlier to others, lose the loudhailer and the pom poms.
The big problem now isn’t whether “evolution” is true or untrue but whether current findings are making it nonsense.
I’m curious. Are there other subjects that might reasonably follow from the content of an article that one is not allowed to debate at Nautilus or in other science media? Experience, anyone? Could we compile a list?
Follow UD News at Twitter!