Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Heart of the conspiracy of teachers …

arroba Email

… to destroy students’ lives by teaching them to ask critical questions

File:A small cup of coffee.JPG

World Magazine penetrates the heart of the secret system of how some teachers undermine happy, ignorant obedience in physics, for example (cue Scare music):

Brown avoids legal quicksand by teaching in a way that prompts students to do their own thinking. As a physics teacher, he doesn’t talk about biology, but introduces the concept of fine-tuning in the universe. For example, the Earth’s atmosphere blocks harmful radiation from the sun but is transparent to the visible light needed for photosynthesis. The Earth is an ideal distance from the sun to host liquid water, and our solar system is ideally placed to avoid dangerous radiation from the center of the galaxy. Brown ends such talks by suggesting to students, “It kind of makes you think!”

Sometimes he gets a class full of blank stares in return. But occasionally a student or two will show interest and spark some back-and-forth discussion. More.

There, you see! He turned on the Think button when all he is supposed to do is emit the curriculum.

Most students won’t remember the details. They will remember whether the details raised any important questions to ponder later in life.

The funny part is that opponents of home schooling and charter schools complain that these newer models of education rob schools of their brightest students. The jury’s out on that one because a key motivation of many opt-out parents is that their kids are not doing as well as they could. See, for example, the film Won’t Back Down.

Science should be all about questioning, observing, experimenting, and thinking. It shouldn't be about reading, memorizing, accepting, and regurgitating. Teachers who tries to kindle the first list in their students should be praised, not blindly accused of "moralizing." Knowing that there's a designer spurs us on to find out why and how. It most certainly doesn't work as you speculated. Querius
Who needs to ponder when you just know it’s RM & NS? The historical experience of the past 150 years shows that when the question of Design is taken off the table for legitimate consideration, “pondering” takes the form of just-so stories and disputes over atheist doctrine. cantor
I'm not sure if innuendoes make good pedagogy. It's pretty phony.
They will remember whether the details raised any important questions to ponder later in life.
Who needs to ponder when you just know it's the Designer? The historical experience of Scholasticism shows that when the question of the Design is taken for granted, this "pondering" takes the form of moralizing and disputes over religious doctrine. sigaba

Leave a Reply