Human evolution News

Early human skull has inner ear “long thought” unique to Neanderthals

Spread the love
Archaic human temporal bone/Chinese Academy of Science

From ScienceDaily:

Re-examination of a circa 100,000-year-old archaic early human skull found 35 years ago in Northern China has revealed the surprising presence of an inner-ear formation long thought to occur only in Neandertals.

“The discovery places into question a whole suite of scenarios of later Pleistocene human population dispersals and interconnections based on tracing isolated anatomical or genetic features in fragmentary fossils,” said study co-author Erik Trinkaus, PhD, a physical anthropology professor at Washington University in St. Louis.

“It suggests, instead, that the later phases of human evolution were more of a labyrinth of biology and peoples than simple lines on maps would suggest.”

See also: Neanderthal Man: The long-lost relative turns up again, this time with documents –  for the way in which the notion of Neanderthals as a “separate species” dies hard despite intense clubbing from evidence. At least, one must play fast and loose with the concept of “species.”

Follow UD News at Twitter!

One Reply to “Early human skull has inner ear “long thought” unique to Neanderthals

  1. 1
    bornagain77 says:

    Good-bye Heidelberg Man: You Never Existed – July 11, 2014
    Excerpt: “If someone kills one person they go to jail,” anthropologist Zeresenay Alemseged of the California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco noted last month at a meeting here in France’s deep south. “But what happens if you kill off a whole species?” The answer soon became apparent: anguished debate. In the balance was Homo heidelbergensis, a big-brained human ancestor generally seen as a pivotal figure, (common ancestor of modern humans and our extinct closest cousins, the Neandertals), during a murky period of evolution. At the invitation-only meeting, researchers debated whether this species really was a major player—or “no more than a paleoanthropologists’ construct”.

Leave a Reply