
This all just somehow happened: A moth’s wings feature two flies picking at a pile of bird dropping. Information transmitted by nobody at all to somebody (a moth predator). Information that happens to be false, which probably increases the complexity.
An accident of natural selection, right? Agree, or we revoke your degree.
You can pick up your brain on the way out, scrubbed clean of all signs of question or doubt.
A good concrete illustration of the absurdity of Darwinian faith.
I remember finding a leaf stuck to a screen a few years ago. I was going to brush it off when I saw legs. I was absolutely astounded by the amazing likeness to a leaf this bug had!
Regardless of supposed evolutionary “explanations”, camouflage and mimicry are very powerful evidences for Design!
A good concrete illustration of the absurdity of Darwinian faith.
I remember finding a leaf stuck to a screen a few years ago. I was going to brush it off when I saw legs. I was absolutely astounded by the amazing likeness to a leaf this bug had!
Regardless of supposed evolutionary “explanations”, camouflage and mimicry seem to me to be very powerful evidences for Design!
Monkey orchids
https://www.google.com/search?q=monkey+orchids&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS563US563&espv=210&es_sm=93&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=SS-aUpGZCMzloASJw4KQBw&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=1024&bih=642
Flying duck orchids
https://www.google.com/search?q=monkey+orchids&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS563US563&espv=210&es_sm=93&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=SS-aUpGZCMzloASJw4KQBw&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=1024&bih=642#es_sm=93&espv=210&q=Flying+duck+orchids&tbm=isch
Wild Orchids of Israel: Seduction of the Long-horned Bee (Irreducible Complexity) – video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFftHXbjEQA
Hammer Orchid and Wasps – video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hv4n85-SqxQ
Of related interest from the insect world:
Orchid Mantis – video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_jwfKyxBrc
Born-again I watched the linked videos you posted and the comment section on youtube has two morons fighting over the difference between theory and fact. They probably didn’t even watch the video! ????
Jaceli123 🙂 Oh well, reminds me of this short video:
The Artists – The Artists is a short film about two rival painters who fail to see the bigger picture.
http://vimeo.com/33670490
HaHa great video. Born-again I just found this blog post called 101 reasons evolution is true heres a link http://ideonexus.com/2012/02/1.....n-is-true/ hope you have time to see what darwinists can come up with.
Jaceli123, I’ve seen most of those supposed evidences for Darwinism before and they are only evidence for evolution in the imagination of Darwinists. What would truly constitute hard scientific evidence for evolution would be if what are perceived to be purely material, Darwinian, processes were ever observed to create molecular machines, new functional proteins, and/or non-trivial functional information (i.e. genes/codes).
Dr. James Tour, who, in my honest opinion, currently builds the most sophisticated man-made molecular machines in the world,,,
,,will buy lunch for anyone who can explain to him exactly how Darwinian evolution works:
And the problem for Darwinists does not get appreciably better if go down to the level of proteins
In fact there is a null hypothesis in place stating that material processes will never be observed generating non-trivial functional information
Ok thanks for all that information @bornagain77 and by the way I liked your blog. I could of sworn I’ve heard someone quoting darwin saying that if any machine, wheel, or any other biological systems resemble todays machinery that his very own theory would fall part. I have no Idea if this quote of any kind exist but I know I’ve heard it somewhere. By the way could a light photons momentum, temperature differences and electromagnetic forces create spontaneous formation of Protocells without DNA from simple biochemical reactions from quantum atom theory.
Jaceli123
“Charles Darwin said (paraphrase), ‘If anyone could find anything that could not be had through a number of slight, successive, modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.’ Well that condition has been met time and time again. Basically every gene, every protein fold. There is nothing of significance that we can show that can be had in a gradualist way. It’s a mirage. None of it happens that way. –
Doug Axe PhD.
Nothing In Molecular Biology Is Gradual – Doug Axe PhD. – video
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/5347797/
you ask:
In my honest opinion, not without guidance by an intelligence. In fact, as mentioned previously, no one has witnessed the formation of single protein by Darwinian processes much less have they witnessed it in a abiotic environment.
Origin Of Life – Problems With Proteins – Homochirality – Charles Thaxton PhD. – video
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/5222490
Homochirality and Darwin: part 2 – Robert Sheldon – May 2010
Excerpt: With regard to the deniers who think homochirality is not much of a problem, I only ask whether a solution requiring multiple massive magnetized black-hole supernovae doesn’t imply there is at least a small difficulty to overcome? A difficulty, perhaps, that points to the non-random nature of life in the cosmos?
http://rbsp.info/PROCRUSTES/ho.....in-part-2/
bornagain77 (5), I think you totally missed the big picture with “the artist”. You did note that when the two artists went “random” all over their canvases they ended up with a realistic likeness of the scene they were painting. Nothing is impossible with “chance”.
Hmmm, reminds me of one of my favorite movies, ‘Being There” with Peter Sellers.