Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Roger Penrose thinks black holes are left over from a previous universe

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Well, it’s an original idea:

There was an earlier universe before the Big Bang, and evidence for its existence can still be observed in black holes, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist has said.

Sir Roger Penrose made the claim after recently winning the award for breakthroughs in Einstein’s general theory of relativity and proof of the existence of black holes…

“I claim that there is observation of Hawking radiation. The Big Bang was not the beginning. There was something before the Big Bang and that something is what we will have in our future”, Sir Roger said, according to The Telegraph. Adam Smith, “Another Universe Existed Before Ours – and Energy from it Is Coming out of Black Holes, Says Nobel Prize Winner” at Independent

It all sounds so much like religion, actually, but maybe that’s the direction in which High Science is heading.

Comments
In a recent debate Sir Roger shrugged when it was pointed out that his position was one of infinite causal regression. He agreed that this was what the astronomers at the Vatican had said too, when he spoke with them. He is not tending towards religion, as I see it, and candidly admits that there are things too mysterious for his understanding the prevalence of order, the effectiveness of maths etc. And in the article in question he concedes the craziness of his idea.Belfast
October 10, 2020
October
10
Oct
10
10
2020
07:37 PM
7
07
37
PM
PDT
If black holes are left over from a previous Universe, what are black holes that begin in a supernova after the Big Bang? Did they too somehow exist before our Universe? I confess I did not read or view the Penrose piece, but the very concept sounds illogical. But then speculating famous physicists can say whatever they like and will get publicized.Fasteddious
October 10, 2020
October
10
Oct
10
10
2020
01:19 PM
1
01
19
PM
PDT
nonsense remains nonsense regardless of who says itjawa
October 10, 2020
October
10
Oct
10
10
2020
06:48 AM
6
06
48
AM
PDT
1 Seversky
I was under the impression that you think religion is a good thing. So, what’s the problem?
Not all religions are a good thing. Atheism for example is a stupid religion that debases reason. A waste of time for pseudo-intellectuals (and you are a prime example). 10 Reasons why Atheists are Delusional https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/11-reasons-why-atheists-are-delusional/ Being delusional is not a good thing, Seversky the meat-robot. Truthfreedom
October 10, 2020
October
10
Oct
10
10
2020
03:36 AM
3
03
36
AM
PDT
Religions have always varied, just as they vary today. Children were sacrificed to false gods in the past and continue today. Under the religion of choice, women have sacrificed their unborn by the millions.BobRyan
October 9, 2020
October
10
Oct
9
09
2020
11:59 PM
11
11
59
PM
PDT
Do you not see the hypocrisy? Seriously you are a PERFECT example of it. You criticize and condemn religion and turn around and embrace this nonsense which is a religion while claiming it’s not a religion and it’s better then religion SO THATS THE PROBLEM, GET IT! Maybe if you didn’t attack religion NO one would care, and it would be business like usual. But no there are these career atheists that make it their mission to ridicule what others believe and make believers look like they have mental issues while pretty much believing in their version of the same damn thing.AaronS1978
October 9, 2020
October
10
Oct
9
09
2020
10:11 PM
10
10
11
PM
PDT
I was under the impression that you think religion is a good thing. So, what's the problem?Seversky
October 9, 2020
October
10
Oct
9
09
2020
07:54 PM
7
07
54
PM
PDT

Leave a Reply