ARN will be giving away a $50 VISA gift card for the best answer to this question:
In the Introduction to his Origin of Species Charles Darwin admitted, “I am well aware that scarcely a single point is discussed in this volume on which facts cannot be adduced, often apparently leading to conclusions directly opposite to those at which I have arrived.”
What directly opposite conclusions could Darwin have meant?
How could natural selection inhibit major evolutionary change from occurring on a gradual step-by-step basis?
Send your answer to email@example.com.
See also: See March’s question here.
Follow UD News at Twitter!