Randy Olson, who in his film Flock of Dodos portrays biologist Jonathan Wells as a fraud for claiming in the book Icons of Evolution (2000) that modern biology textbooks continued to reprint Haeckel-based drawings.
But it turns out that Olson is the one who is promoting a fraud….
Olson must believe his viewers are a bunch of “dodos†if he believes they are going to fall for such a complete rewriting of history!
Visit www.hoaxofdodos.com
And watch this video Hoax of Dodos Video
The ends always justify the means for those guys.
I saw those embryo drawings in my 1998 HS biology class…
Olson must believe his viewers are a bunch of “dodos†if he believes they are going to fall for such a complete rewriting of history!
Why would you think he doesn’t? Easiest way to get stupid people to follow you is to tell them they are smart.
I’ve also seem the distorted drawings (I made sure) in two text books I’ve used for biology in H.S.
Hey! That Casey sure is a good actor.
Well done. Well done.
I guess Randy Olson is a huge liar.
“I guess Randy Olson is a huge liar.”
I think in film-making, it’s called “artistic license”, not lying.
I think it was Michael Moore who referred to one of his films as a “documentary” when he could get away with it, and “entertainment” when he couldn’t (i.e. when someone challenged his facts or misrepresentations). Perhaps Olson will claim that “Dodos” is “just entertainment”.
Moore, Morgan Spurlock and Alexandra Pelosi’s style of filmmaking is similar to a newspaper op-ed piece. They have an opinion and they are going to muster evidence to make their point. They also will mix in their sense of humor and cultural sensabilities. I really enjoyed Michael Moore’s Roger and Me and Bowling for Columbine but felt fully manipulated in Farenheit 9/11. I bet Olson is in the same vein as the others.