Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

At Live Science: Why can’t we drink saltwater?

Categories
Human evolution
Intelligent Design
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

The Earth’s surface is 71% water, but just 3.5% of it is drinkable.

Water is essential for our survival, and yet more than 96% of the planet’s liquid water is ocean water — and it contains so much salt that it’s undrinkable by humans. 

Salty sea water won’t quench your thirst, and drinking too much can even lead to death by dehydration.

But if saltwater is still water, why can’t we drink it?

The answer to that question is actually pretty straightforward: Saltwater is simply too salty for our kidneys to manage.

Approximately 3.5% of seawater’s weight comes from dissolved salt, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(opens in new tab) (NOAA). If all the salt in the oceans were removed and spread over every land surface on Earth, the salty layer would tower more than 500 feet (166 meters) high — about as tall as a 40-story office building, NOAA says. The saltiness, or salinity, of seawater is too high for humans to safely process, as our cells require water “in a relatively pure form,” said Rob DeSalle, a curator in the Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City.

“For most animals, the kidneys filter impurities out of water,” DeSalle told Live Science, told Live Science. “What happens when you drink saltwater is you ingest a lot of salt that the body now needs to wash out [of the body].”

It does this in the form of urine, which the kidneys produce by dissolving impurities in excess water, which is then sent to the bladder to be eliminated. But the kidneys can only produce urine that is less salty than our blood, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(opens in new tab), and saltwater contains more than three times the amount of salt that is normally present in human blood. This means that for every cup of saltwater you drink, you’d need to drink at least the same volume of water in order for your kidneys to flush out all that salt.

Some animals can drink saltwater, so why can’t we?

Some animals, in ocean ecosystems, however, have adaptations that allow them to safely drink saltwater. Seabirds such as albatrosses, gulls and penguins, which might spend weeks on the open ocean with no freshwater in sight, have specialized salt glands and grooves in their bills for filtering and purging excess salt from ingested water before it hits their stomachs and is absorbed into their blood, according to the Audubon Society(opens in new tab). Marine mammals such as whales, dolphins and seals have also evolved adaptations to life in an environment where freshwater is scarce or absent.

“Marine mammals have adapted special enzymes and cellular structures that allow them to purge excess salt from their systems,” DeSalle said. “It’s like they have super kidneys.”

So why don’t we? Why did humans — and nearly all other land animals, for that matter —evolve to drink freshwater when saltwater is so much more plentiful? As animals emerged from the ancient seas hundreds of millions of years ago and began adapting to life on land, species moved away from coastal habitats where there was lots of saltwater. Many terrestrial species — including our primate ancestors — eventually came to inhabit inland ecosystems that had plenty of freshwater in lakes and rivers, but very few, if any, saltwater sources. This likely shaped biological adaptations for drinking water that wasn’t salty.

“Most of our ancestors were not exposed to saltwater, whether it’s animals in general, primates, or insectivores,” DeSalle said. “So natural selection honed in on processing unsalty water, and our physiology became so fine-tuned that disrupting it with saltwater down the line becomes very dangerous and damaging.”

Live Science

Give a salt-water organism fresh water and it will develop biological systems for drinking fresh water? This sounds like Lamarckianism (aka the magic wand of adaptation). Where’s the evidence for the natural mechanism that shows that new, complex biological systems can develop on cue to meet the needs of a species for survival?

Comments
I think the environment designs. When water first condensed on the Earth's surface over four billion years ago, it would have contained no salt. Sure, minerals must then have dissolved in the seas but it would have taken time. The first marine organisms would not have had the same salinity in their environment that exists today.Fred Hickson
June 27, 2022
June
06
Jun
27
27
2022
11:55 PM
11
11
55
PM
PDT
...of course, also Earth’s eco-system had to be designed. Only very naive people (including biologists) can believe that it wasn’t.
There are more than two choices: the universe is designed, the universe isn't designed, there is another explanation that we haven't thought of yet. The default in science should be "we don't know" rather than an explanation unsupported by evidence.Fred Hickson
June 27, 2022
June
06
Jun
27
27
2022
11:49 PM
11
11
49
PM
PDT
The Earth’s surface is 71% water, but just 3.5% of it is drinkable.
yes, it is funny ... Darwinian theory of evolution never makes sense .... you know, what happened to all those selection pressures and adaptations and other Darwinian blah blah blah ..... :)))))martin_r
June 27, 2022
June
06
Jun
27
27
2022
11:23 PM
11
11
23
PM
PDT
Jerry @1 let me add to yours of course, also Earth's eco-system had to be designed. Only very naive people (including biologists) can believe that it wasn't. Here is an example, when humans tried to design an ecosystem ... it was a disaster ... Project Biosphere 2
Biosphere 2 was only used twice for its original intended purposes as a closed-system experiment: once from 1991 to 1993, and the second time from March to September 1994. Both attempts, though heavily publicized, ran into problems including low amounts of food and oxygen, die-offs of many animals and plants included in the experiment (though this was anticipated since the project used a strategy of deliberately "species-packing" anticipating losses as the biomes developed) ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_2martin_r
June 27, 2022
June
06
Jun
27
27
2022
11:13 PM
11
11
13
PM
PDT
Lawrence J. Henderson's - The Fitness of the Environment https://archive.org/details/cu31924003093659 One of the first books that inspired Michael Denton.Silver Asiatic
June 27, 2022
June
06
Jun
27
27
2022
07:08 PM
7
07
08
PM
PDT
ID is missing a major part of design. Namely, ecology. We know that the universe is fine tuned. Earth is also fine tuned. But also all species exist in consort with several thousand other species. It is called ecology, a topic rarely discussed in ID and on UD. But these species could not exist unless the ecology within which these species are part is also fine tuned. The implications of this which are so obvious is that these species can not vary much or else they will destroy the ecology and themselves. In other words Darwinian Evolution is impossible.jerry
June 27, 2022
June
06
Jun
27
27
2022
05:13 PM
5
05
13
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply