Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Behe refuted yet again

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Here you go: Irreducible complexity for free by a (carefully programmed) accident: stellaralchemy.com/ice.

Comments
bfast, Color me lazy (I did search a little), but where is Behe's new paper? EDIT: Here it is http://www.proteinscience.org/cgi/reprint/13/10/2651?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=1&author1=behe&andorexacttitle=and&andorexacttitleabs=and&andorexactfulltext=and&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&resourcetype=HWCIT Discussed here: http://www.evolutionnews.org/2006/04/sorry_darwinists_the_journal_s_1.html http://www.evolutionnews.org/2006/10/response_to_barbara_forrests_k_8.htmlPatrick
February 6, 2007
February
02
Feb
6
06
2007
07:09 PM
7
07
09
PM
PDT
WinstonEwert, "Allright, who can expound on the method used to achieve "IC"?" I haven't analyzed the source code of this particular project terribly closely. However, if two "mutations" are required to achieve a given result, then the pair of mutations would technically, barely, be considered "IC". This would be achieved as follows: a "mutation" happens that "at least does no harm" so it is permitted to continue -- then a second mutation happens that completes the "IC" scenerio. Now, if the number of possible "mutations" is extremely limited (5^100), this scenerio can happen fairly regularly. If the number of possible "mutations" is huge, the chance of getting a matched pair becomes really low. Further, Behe's recently published paper shows that it is possible, in bacteria (short lifespan, smaller genome) to get 2 component IC once in a blue moon. Getting 3 component IC is much harder, and 4 gets into the zone of rediculous. The number of "matching" mutations that would be required to assemble a bacterial flagellum from known components is, like, 20. Such is the nature of "a little bit IC" (2 component) verses "very IC", flagellum.bFast
February 6, 2007
February
02
Feb
6
06
2007
06:33 PM
6
06
33
PM
PDT
Winston: Exactly the point.. there's a method. meth·od –noun 1. a procedure, technique, or way of doing something, esp. in accordance with a definite plan: There are three possible methods of repairing this motor. -Random House Unabridged Dictionary, copyright Random House, Inc. 2006.JGuy
February 6, 2007
February
02
Feb
6
06
2007
06:31 PM
6
06
31
PM
PDT
Allright, who can expound the method used to achieve "IC"?WinstonEwert
February 6, 2007
February
02
Feb
6
06
2007
05:49 PM
5
05
49
PM
PDT
Personally, I've been having more of an educational experience with the Panda-Monium file on UD. https://uncommondescent.com/darwinalia/panda-monium.swf Still trying to bet level seven.JGuy
February 6, 2007
February
02
Feb
6
06
2007
05:10 PM
5
05
10
PM
PDT
Also, (somebody correct me if I'm wrong) Isn't this thing not even SC? From my envelope, it is a matrix of 10 by 10 squares, each with one of five possible values (four letters or a blank space). This gives us a complexity per solution of: 5^100 ...which is not 10^150...Atom
February 6, 2007
February
02
Feb
6
06
2007
03:17 PM
3
03
17
PM
PDT
I don't know, in 936 generations, I got rapidly deteriorating fitness, and by that generation every last offsping had a fitness score of 0. Yet they still reproduced like normal and went on with business as usual.Atom
February 6, 2007
February
02
Feb
6
06
2007
02:46 PM
2
02
46
PM
PDT
This (from the explanation) says it all: "...game I created just for this purpose"dacook
February 6, 2007
February
02
Feb
6
06
2007
02:23 PM
2
02
23
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply