Can a simple triangle disprove materialism?

9 Replies to “Can a simple triangle disprove materialism?”

1. 1
   Belfast says:

   August 18, 2019 at 5:15 pm

   Is there any evidence that a gorilla, or a pig or a dog can have an abstract thought? I don’t know, but would like to.
2. 2
   vmahuna says:

   August 18, 2019 at 6:08 pm

   Belfast @1, puppy dogs like to play, as do many young animals. When they play with humans, they do not appear to be fighting for dominance over other members of their pack (which frequently contains more humans than dogs). They appear to be doing it for FUN. In the case of playing Fetch, the dog quickly learns that if he or she brings the ball back to a human, even a little human, the human will throw the ball for the dog to chase again. The humans normally get bored with the game long before the dogs do.
   So dogs ENJOY doing things that do not give them: food, shelter, better chances of mating, increased status in the pack, or a more comfortable place to sleep. I would then argue that Joy/Fun is abstract. You can’t measure it, but you know it when you see it. And when our dog comes to me not with the sad doggie face (PLEASE, daddy, PLEASE?), but with the SMILEY FACE (and there can be no word for it except a smile), there is no doubt in either of us that he wants to “play”.
3. 3
   AaronS1978 says:

   August 18, 2019 at 8:59 pm

   Nah joy and fun are chemical addictions produced in the brain And caused by a sudden rush of dopamine in the appropriate areas of the brain it’s not that they’re actually thinking of joy and fun there just following the rush that they are getting the carrot that’s been placed in front of them and they will continue to chase it and fulfill that feeling

   Just like love or any other concepts it’s nothing more than a chemical reaction inside the brain that forces you to take action to survive

   Playing allows the body to get exercise and to develop muscular structure is to allow them to hunt later on in life or fight back

   Hence evolution has created that mechanism to allow this development before you would have to use it so you’ll be here able to and prepared to use it when you have to

   So there’s nothing abstract about it It’s just another chemical reaction
4. 4
   FourFaces says:

   August 18, 2019 at 9:00 pm

   It’s not just triangles. Concepts like distance, volume, surface, length, width, height, time, beauty, ugliness, colors, tastes, order, disorder, etc. are all abstract. They do not exist in the physical universe. Does this mean that we can conceivably build technologies that will allow us to travel instantly from anywhere to anywhere? The answer is yes. Nonspatiality is nonlocality.
   If you want to know whether something is abstract or physical, do like Immanuel Kant and ask the following questions: What is is made of and where is it? If you can’t answer, than it is abstract. Of course, the abstract requires a soul and a soul is a community of many mini-souls aka qualia. Materialism is nonsense.
5. 5
   Latemarch says:

   August 19, 2019 at 5:52 am

   AS1978:

   Nah joy and fun are chemical addictions produced in the brain And caused by a sudden rush of dopamine in the appropriate areas of the brain it’s not that they’re actually thinking of joy and fun there just following the rush that they are getting the carrot that’s been placed in front of them and they will continue to chase it and fulfill that feeling

   What a bleak world you live in.
   Physics explains Chemistry, Chemistry explains Biology, and Biology explains nothing. It’s all just atoms bouncing around.
   Oh, and from now on, you don’t get to use the words ‘fun’ or ‘joy’ or ‘play’ because in a deterministic world they have no meaning as does logically your life.

   But just maybe, a universe that has the concept of play embedded in it holds out a different possibility.
6. 6
   bornagain77 says:

   August 20, 2019 at 4:56 am

   “Can A Simple Triangle Disprove Materialism?”

   Not only triangles, but the entire field of mathematics and logic falsifies Atheistic materialism. As David Berlinski succinctly put it,,, “There is no argument against religion that is not also an argument against mathematics. Mathematicians are capable of grasping a world of objects that lies beyond space and time….”

   An Interview with David Berlinski – Jonathan Witt
   Berlinski: There is no argument against religion that is not also an argument against mathematics. Mathematicians are capable of grasping a world of objects that lies beyond space and time….
   Interviewer:… Come again(?) …
   Berlinski: No need to come again: I got to where I was going the first time. The number four, after all, did not come into existence at a particular time, and it is not going to go out of existence at another time. It is neither here nor there. Nonetheless we are in some sense able to grasp the number by a faculty of our minds. Mathematical intuition is utterly mysterious. So for that matter is the fact that mathematical objects such as a Lie Group or a differentiable manifold have the power to interact with elementary particles or accelerating forces. But these are precisely the claims that theologians have always made as well – that human beings are capable by an exercise of their devotional abilities to come to some understanding of the deity; and the deity, although beyond space and time, is capable of interacting with material objects.
   http://tofspot.blogspot.com/20.....-here.html

   Indeed, as Dr. Egnor points out, “It is astonishing (and beautiful) that the very retinaculum of the universe, from the subatomic world to the cosmos, is drawn in elegant abstract mathematics. The universe screams intelligent authority.”

   Atheism Is a Catastrophe for Science – Michael Egnor – September 20, 2016
   Excerpt: Nature is governed by astonishingly complex and elegant physical laws, and the laws themselves are written in the language of abstract mathematics. In fact, theoretical physicists must often explore utterly new mathematical theories in order to explain the behavior of inanimate matter.
   After all, Newton discovered calculus in order to do physics. Heaviside (using Maxwell’s equations) needed to develop the calculus of electromagnetic oscillators to understand alternating current electricity. Einstein (and his friend the mathematician Grossman) reinvented non-Euclidean geometry and tensor calculus to understand relativity. Heisenberg had to develop matrix mechanics to understand the quantum world. Dirac predicted the existence of anti-matter purely on the basis of mathematical considerations, and modern string theorists such as Edward Witten work at the cutting edge of mathematics. Black holes were predicted based on singularities in the tensor equations of relativity, and the Big Bang itself was discovered mathematically by Georges Lemaitre (a Catholic priest!) before it was detected empirically.
   It is astonishing (and beautiful) that the very retinaculum of the universe, from the subatomic world to the cosmos, is drawn in elegant abstract mathematics. The universe screams intelligent authority.
   http://www.evolutionnews.org/2.....03154.html

   Besides the universe, abstract “Mathematics (also) underlies virtually all of our technology today.”

   Describing Nature With Math By Peter Tyson – Nov. 2011
   Excerpt: Mathematics underlies virtually all of our technology today. James Maxwell’s four equations summarizing electromagnetism led directly to radio and all other forms of telecommunication. E = mc2 led directly to nuclear power and nuclear weapons. The equations of quantum mechanics made possible everything from transistors and semiconductors to electron microscopy and magnetic resonance imaging.
   Indeed, many of the technologies you and I enjoy every day simply would not work without mathematics. When you do a Google search, you’re relying on 19th-century algebra, on which the search engine’s algorithms are based. When you watch a movie, you may well be seeing mountains and other natural features that, while appearing as real as rock, arise entirely from mathematical models. When you play your iPod, you’re hearing a mathematical recreation of music that is stored digitally; your cell phone does the same in real time.
   “When you listen to a mobile phone, you’re not actually hearing the voice of the person speaking,” Devlin told me. “You’re hearing a mathematical recreation of that voice. That voice is reduced to mathematics.”
   http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/p.....-math.html

   Like abstract mathematics, abstract logic itself does not exist in the space-time continuum,,,

   Naturalism and Self-Refutation – Michael Egnor – January 31, 2018
   Excerpt: For Clark, thoughts merely appear out of matter, which has no properties, by the laws of physics, for generating thought. For Clark to assert that naturalistic matter as described by physics gives rise to the mind, without immateriality of any sort, is merely to assert magic.
   Furthermore, the very framework of Clark’s argument — logic — is neither material nor natural. Logic, after all, doesn’t exist “in the space-time continuum” and isn’t described by physics. What is the location of modus ponens? How much does Gödel’s incompleteness theorem weigh? What is the physics of non-contradiction? How many millimeters long is Clark’s argument for naturalism? Ironically the very logic that Clark employs to argue for naturalism is outside of any naturalistic frame.
   The strength of Clark’s defense of naturalism is that it is an attempt to present naturalism’s tenets clearly and logically. That is its weakness as well, because it exposes naturalism to scrutiny, and naturalism cannot withstand even minimal scrutiny. Even to define naturalism is to refute it.
   https://evolutionnews.org/2018/01/naturalism-and-self-refutation/

   And although many theoretical physicists today believe they can construct a purely mathematical ‘theory of everything’ without recourse to God, Godel, via logic, was able to prove that mathematics itself is ‘incomplete’. As the following article succinctly puts it, Godel proved that “Math could not play the role of God as infinite and autonomous.”

   Taking God Out of the Equation – Biblical Worldview – by Ron Tagliapietra – January 1, 2012
   Excerpt: Kurt Gödel (1906–1978) proved that no logical systems (if they include the counting numbers) can have all three of the following properties.
   1. Validity … all conclusions are reached by valid reasoning.
   2. Consistency … no conclusions contradict any other conclusions.
   3. Completeness … all statements made in the system are either true or false.
   The details filled a book, but the basic concept was simple and elegant. He (Godel) summed it up this way: “Anything you can draw a circle around cannot explain itself without referring to something outside the circle—something you have to assume but cannot prove.” For this reason, his proof is also called the Incompleteness Theorem.
   Kurt Gödel had dropped a bomb on the foundations of mathematics. Math could not play the role of God as infinite and autonomous. It was shocking, though, that logic could prove that mathematics could not be its own ultimate foundation.
   Christians should not have been surprised. The first two conditions are true about math: it is valid and consistent. But only God fulfills the third condition. Only He is complete and therefore self-dependent (autonomous). God alone is “all in all” (1 Corinthians 15:28), “the beginning and the end” (Revelation 22:13). God is the ultimate authority (Hebrews 6:13), and in Christ are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge (Colossians 2:3).
   http://www.answersingenesis.or...../equation#

   Even Hawking himself conceded that, “Kurt Gödel halted the achievement of a unifying all-encompassing theory of everything in his theorem that: “Anything you can draw a circle around cannot explain itself without referring to something outside the circle—something you have to assume but cannot prove”.

   Gödel’s incompleteness theorem (1931), proves that there are limits to what can be ascertained by mathematics. Kurt Gödel halted the achievement of a unifying all-encompassing theory of everything in his theorem that: “Anything you can draw a circle around cannot explain itself without referring to something outside the circle—something you have to assume but cannot prove”. Thus, based on the position that an equation cannot prove itself, the constructs are based on assumptions some of which will be unprovable.”
   Cf., Stephen Hawking & Leonard Miodinow, The Grand Design (2010)

   It is also important to note that, although atheistic materialists deny the existence of free will, never-the-less, free will is essential to our ability to practice mathematics in the first place. As the following paper points out, “Creating new axioms and free will are shown to be different aspects of the same phenomena: the creation of new information.”

   Algorithmic Information Theory, Free Will and the Turing Test – Douglas S. Robertson
   Excerpt: Chaitin’s Algorithmic Information Theory shows that information is conserved under formal mathematical operations and, equivalently, under computer operations. This conservation law puts a new perspective on many familiar problems related to artificial intelligence. For example, the famous “Turing test” for artificial intelligence could be defeated by simply asking for a new axiom in mathematics. Human mathematicians are able to create axioms, but a computer program cannot do this without violating information conservation. Creating new axioms and free will are shown to be different aspects of the same phenomena: the creation of new information.
   http://cires.colorado.edu/~dou...../info8.pdf

   And as James Franklin put it, “the intellect (is) immaterial and immortal. If today’s naturalists do not wish to agree with that, there is a challenge for them. ‘Don’t tell me, show me’: build an artificial intelligence system that imitates genuine mathematical insight. There seem to be no promising plans on the drawing board.,,,”

   “the intellect (is) immaterial and immortal. If today’s naturalists do not wish to agree with that, there is a challenge for them. ‘Don’t tell me, show me’: build an artificial intelligence system that imitates genuine mathematical insight. There seem to be no promising plans on the drawing board.,,,”
   – James Franklin is professor of mathematics at the University of New South Wales in Sydney.

   In fact, our ability to argue in a logically coherent fashion in the first place would be impossible if we did not first have the free will necessary to do so. As the following article put it, “The claim (from atheistic materialists) that free will is an illusion requires the possibility that minds have the freedom to assent to a logical argument, a freedom denied by the claim itself. It is an assent that must, in order to remain logical and not physiological, presume a perspective outside the physical order.”

   Sam Harris’s Free Will: The Medial Pre-Frontal Cortex Did It – Martin Cothran – November 9, 2012
   Excerpt: There is something ironic about the position of thinkers like Harris on issues like this: they claim that their position is the result of the irresistible necessity of logic (in fact, they pride themselves on their logic). Their belief is the consequent, in a ground/consequent relation between their evidence and their conclusion. But their very stated position is that any mental state — including their position on this issue — is the effect of a physical, not logical cause.
   By their own logic, it isn’t logic that demands their assent to the claim that free will is an illusion, but the prior chemical state of their brains. The only condition under which we could possibly find their argument convincing is if they are not true. The claim that free will is an illusion requires the possibility that minds have the freedom to assent to a logical argument, a freedom denied by the claim itself. It is an assent that must, in order to remain logical and not physiological, presume a perspective outside the physical order.
   http://www.evolutionnews.org/2.....66221.html

   The denial of free will and/or agent causality by atheistic materialists is simply insane. As Paul Nelson put it, Methodological Naturalism “MN entails an ontology in which minds are the consequence of physics, and thus, can only be placeholders for a more detailed causal account in which physics is the only (ultimate) actor. You didn’t write your email to me. Physics did, and informed you of that event after the fact. “That’s crazy,” you reply, “I certainly did write my email.””

   Do You Like SETI? Fine, Then Let’s Dump Methodological Naturalism – Paul Nelson – September 24, 2014
   Excerpt: Epistemology — how we know — and ontology — what exists — are both affected by methodological naturalism (MN). If we say, “We cannot know that a mind caused x,” laying down an epistemological boundary defined by MN, then our ontology comprising real causes for x won’t include minds.
   MN entails an ontology in which minds are the consequence of physics, and thus, can only be placeholders for a more detailed causal account in which physics is the only (ultimate) actor. You didn’t write your email to me. Physics did, and informed you of that event after the fact.
   “That’s crazy,” you reply, “I certainly did write my email.” Okay, then — to what does the pronoun “I” in that sentence refer?
   Your personal agency; your mind. Are you supernatural?,,,
   You are certainly an intelligent cause, however, and your intelligence does not collapse into physics. (If it does collapse — i.e., can be reduced without explanatory loss — we haven’t the faintest idea how, which amounts to the same thing.) To explain the effects you bring about in the world — such as your email, a real pattern — we must refer to you as a unique agent.
   https://evolutionnews.org/2014/09/do_you_like_set/
7. 7
   bornagain77 says:

   August 20, 2019 at 4:58 am

   Besides just pointing out the sheer insanity of Atheistic Materialists denying the reality of their own free will, the Intelligent Design advocate can now also point to the empirical evidence of neuroscience and quantum mechanics to support the reality of free will:

   As to evidence from neuroscience:

   Science and the Soul – Michael Egnor – June 2018
   Excerpt: Consistently he found that the conscious decision to push the button was preceded by about half a second by a brain wave, which he called the readiness potential. Then a half-second later the subject became aware of his decision. It appeared at first that the subjects were not free; their brains made the decision to move and they followed it.
   But Libet looked deeper. He asked his subjects to veto their decision immediately after they made it – to not push the button. Again, the readiness potential appeared a half-second before conscious awareness of the decision to push the button, but Libet found that the veto – he called it “free won’t” – had no brain wave corresponding to it.
   The brain, then, has activity that corresponds to a pre-conscious urge to do something. But we are free to veto or accept this urge. The motives are material. The veto, and implicitly the acceptance, is an immaterial act of the will.
   Libet noted the correspondence between his experiments and the traditional religious understanding of human beings. We are, he said, beset by a sea of inclinations, corresponding to material activity in our brains, which we have the free choice to reject or accept. It is hard not to read this in more familiar terms: we are tempted by sin, yet we are free to choose.
   https://www.plough.com/en/topics/justice/reconciliation/science-and-the-soul

   No, You’re Not a Robot Made Out of Meat (Science Uprising 02)
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQo6SWjwQIk&list=PLR8eQzfCOiS1OmYcqv_yQSpje4p7rAE7-&index=3

   Michael Egnor: The Evidence against Materialism
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqHrpBPdtSI&list=PLR8eQzfCOiS1OmYcqv_yQSpje4p7rAE7-&index=8

   As to evidence from quantum mechanics, the last major ‘loop-hole’ that was left to be closed in quantum mechanics was the ‘free-will’ loop-hole:

   Closing the ‘free will’ loophole: Using distant quasars to test Bell’s theorem – February 20, 2014
   Excerpt: Though two major loopholes have since been closed, a third remains; physicists refer to it as “setting independence,” or more provocatively, “free will.” This loophole proposes that a particle detector’s settings may “conspire” with events in the shared causal past of the detectors themselves to determine which properties of the particle to measure — a scenario that, however far-fetched, implies that a physicist running the experiment does not have complete free will in choosing each detector’s setting. Such a scenario would result in biased measurements, suggesting that two particles are correlated more than they actually are, and giving more weight to quantum mechanics than classical physics.
   “It sounds creepy, but people realized that’s a logical possibility that hasn’t been closed yet,” says MIT’s David Kaiser, the Germeshausen Professor of the History of Science and senior lecturer in the Department of Physics. “Before we make the leap to say the equations of quantum theory tell us the world is inescapably crazy and bizarre, have we closed every conceivable logical loophole, even if they may not seem plausible in the world we know today?”
   https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140220112515.htm

   That “creepy” and “far-fetched” possibility “that a physicist running the experiment does not have complete free will in choosing each detector’s setting”, (which is exactly the “creepy” and “far-fetched” possibility that atheists hold to be true), has now been, for all practical purposes, closed.

   Anton Zeilinger and company have now pushed the “free-will loophole” back to 7.8 billion years ago by using quasars to determine measurement settings.

   Cosmic Bell Test Using Random Measurement Settings from High-Redshift Quasars – Anton Zeilinger – 14 June 2018
   Abstract: In this Letter, we present a cosmic Bell experiment with polarization-entangled photons, in which measurement settings were determined based on real-time measurements of the wavelength of photons from high-redshift quasars, whose light was emitted billions of years ago; the experiment simultaneously ensures locality. Assuming fair sampling for all detected photons and that the wavelength of the quasar photons had not been selectively altered or previewed between emission and detection, we observe statistically significant violation of Bell’s inequality by 9.3 standard deviations, corresponding to an estimated p value of ? 7.4 × 10^21. This experiment pushes back to at least ? 7.8 Gyr ago the most recent time by which any local-realist influences could have exploited the “freedom-of-choice” loophole to engineer the observed Bell violation, excluding any such mechanism from 96% of the space-time volume of the past light cone of our experiment, extending from the big bang to today.
   https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.080403

   In a more direct way that is easier for people to see, free will is also now validated in quantum mechanics with Contexuality and/or the Kochen-Speckter Theorem,

   With contextuality we find, “In the quantum world, the property that you discover through measurement is not the property that the system actually had prior to the measurement process. What you observe necessarily depends on how you carried out the observation” and “Measurement outcomes depend on all the other measurements that are performed – the full context of the experiment. Contextuality means that quantum measurements can not be thought of as simply revealing some pre-existing properties of the system under study. ”

   Contextuality is ‘magic ingredient’ for quantum computing – June 11, 2012
   Excerpt: Contextuality was first recognized as a feature of quantum theory almost 50 years ago. The theory showed that it was impossible to explain measurements on quantum systems in the same way as classical systems.
   In the classical world, measurements simply reveal properties that the system had, such as colour, prior to the measurement. In the quantum world, the property that you discover through measurement is not the property that the system actually had prior to the measurement process. What you observe necessarily depends on how you carried out the observation.
   Imagine turning over a playing card. It will be either a red suit or a black suit – a two-outcome measurement. Now imagine nine playing cards laid out in a grid with three rows and three columns. Quantum mechanics predicts something that seems contradictory – there must be an even number of red cards in every row and an odd number of red cards in every column. Try to draw a grid that obeys these rules and you will find it impossible. It’s because quantum measurements cannot be interpreted as merely revealing a pre-existing property in the same way that flipping a card reveals a red or black suit.
   Measurement outcomes depend on all the other measurements that are performed – the full context of the experiment.
   Contextuality means that quantum measurements can not be thought of as simply revealing some pre-existing properties of the system under study. That’s part of the weirdness of quantum mechanics.
   http://phys.org/news/2014-06-w.....antum.html

   And in the Kochen-Speckter Theorem we find, as leading experimental physicist Anton Zeilinger states in the following video, that “what we perceive as reality now depends on our earlier decision what to measure. Which is a very, very, deep message about the nature of reality and our part in the whole universe. We are not just passive observers.”

   “The Kochen-Speckter Theorem talks about properties of one system only. So we know that we cannot assume – to put it precisely, we know that it is wrong to assume that the features of a system, which we observe in a measurement exist prior to measurement. Not always. I mean in a certain cases. So in a sense, what we perceive as reality now depends on our earlier decision what to measure. Which is a very, very, deep message about the nature of reality and our part in the whole universe. We are not just passive observers.”
   Anton Zeilinger –
   Quantum Physics Debunks Materialism – video (7:17 minute mark)
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=4C5pq7W5yRM#t=437

   This finding is simply devastating to the atheist’s deterministic view of humanity, i.e. to their view that we are merely ‘meat robots’.

   Moreover allowing free will and/or Agent causality into the laws of physics at their most fundamental level has a fairly profound implication for Christianity in particular.

   Allowing the Agent causality of God ‘back’ into physics, as the Christian founders of modern science originally envisioned,,,, (Isaac Newton, Michael Faraday, James Clerk Maxwell, and Max Planck, to name a few of the Christian founders),,, and as quantum mechanics itself now empirically demands (with the closing of the free will loophole by Anton Zeilinger and company), rightly allowing the Agent causality of God ‘back’ into physics provides us with a very plausible resolution for the much sought after ‘theory of everything’ in that Christ’s resurrection from the dead provides an empirically backed reconciliation, via the Shroud of Turin, between quantum mechanics and general relativity into the much sought after ‘Theory of Everything”.

   As Isabel Piczek and Chuck Missler note in the following video and articles, the Shroud of Turin reveals a strange ‘event horizon’:

   “When you look at the image of the shroud, the two bodies next to each other, you feel that it is a flat image. But if you create, for instance, a three dimensional object, as I did, the real body, then you realize that there is a strange dividing element. An interface from which the image is projected up and the image is projected down. The muscles of the body are absolutely not crushed against the stone of the tomb. They are perfect. It means the body is hovering between the two sides of the shroud. What does that mean? It means there is absolutely no gravity. Other strange you discover is that the image is absolutely undistorted. Now if you imagine the clothe was wrinkled, tied, wrapped around the body, and all of the sudden you see a perfect image, which is impossible unless the shroud was made absolutely taut, rigidly taut.”
   Isabel Piczek – Turin shroud – (Particle Physicist explains event horizon) – video
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIpdIz5Rp3I

   THE EVENT HORIZON (Space-Time Singularity) OF THE SHROUD OF TURIN. – Isabel Piczek – Particle Physicist
   Excerpt: We have stated before that the images on the Shroud firmly indicate the total absence of Gravity. Yet they also firmly indicate the presence of the Event Horizon. These two seemingly contradict each other and they necessitate the past presence of something more powerful than Gravity that had the capacity to solve the above paradox.
   http://shroud3d.com/findings/i.....-formation

   “You can read the science of the Shroud, such as total lack of gravity, lack of entropy (without gravitational collapse), no time, no space—it conforms to no known law of physics.” The phenomenon of the image brings us to a true event horizon, a moment when all of the laws of physics change drastically. Dame Piczek created a one-fourth size sculpture of the man in the Shroud. When viewed from the side, it appears as if the man is suspended in mid air (see graphic, below), indicating that the image defies previously accepted science. The phenomenon of the image brings us to a true event horizon, a moment when all of the laws of physics change drastically.
   – Chuck Missler – A Quantum Hologram of Christ’s Resurrection?
8. 8
   bornagain77 says:

   August 20, 2019 at 4:58 am

   The following study states that ‘The bottom part of the cloth (containing the dorsal image) would have born all the weight of the man’s supine body, yet the dorsal image is not encoded with a greater amount of intensity than the frontal image.’

   Particle Radiation from the Body – July 2012 – M. Antonacci, A. C. Lind
   Excerpt: The Shroud’s frontal and dorsal body images are encoded with the same amount of intensity, independent of any pressure or weight from the body. The bottom part of the cloth (containing the dorsal image) would have born all the weight of the man’s supine body, yet the dorsal image is not encoded with a greater amount of intensity than the frontal image. Radiation coming from the body would not only explain this feature, but also the left/right and light/dark reversals found on the cloth’s frontal and dorsal body images.
   http://www.academicjournals.or.....onacci.pdf

   Moreover, besides gravity being dealt with, the shroud also gives us evidence that Quantum Mechanics was dealt with. In the following paper, it was found that it was not possible to describe the image formation on the Shroud in classical terms but they found it necessary to describe the formation of the image on the Shroud in discrete quantum terms.

   The absorbed energy in the Shroud body image formation appears as contributed by discrete (quantum) values – Giovanni Fazio, Giuseppe Mandaglio – 2008
   Excerpt: This result means that the optical density distribution,, can not be attributed at the absorbed energy described in the framework of the classical physics model. It is, in fact, necessary to hypothesize a absorption by discrete values of the energy where the ‘quantum’ is equal to the one necessary to yellow one fibril.
   http://cab.unime.it/mus/541/1/c1a0802004.pdf

   Kevin Moran, an optical engineer working on the mysterious ‘3D’ nature of the Shroud image, states the ‘supernatural’ explanation this way, “This suggests a quantum event where a finite amount of energy transferred abruptly. The fact that there are images front and back suggests the radiating particles were released along the gravity vector.”

   Optically Terminated Image Pixels Observed on Frei 1978 Samples – Kevin E. Moran – 1999
   Discussion
   Pia’s negative photograph, from 1898, showed what looked to be a body that was glowing, but slightly submerged in a bath of cloudy water. This condition is more properly described as an image that is visible, at a distance, but by locally attenuated radiation. The unique front-and-back only image can be best described as gravitationally collimated. The radiation that made the image acted perfectly parallel to gravity. There is no side image. The radiation is parallel to gravity and, if moving at light speed, only lasted about 100 picoseconds. It is particulate in nature, colliding only with some of the fibers. It is not a continuum or spherical-front radiation that made the image, as visible or UV light. It is not the X-ray radiation that obeys the one over R squared law that we are so accustomed to in medicine. It is more unique,,,
   Theoretical model
   It is suggested that the image was formed when a high-energy particle struck the fiber and released radiation within the fiber at a speed greater that the local speed of light. Since the fiber acts as a light pipe, this energy moved out through the fiber until it encountered an optical discontinuity, then it slowed to the local speed of light and dispersed.
   Discussion
   The fact that the pixels don’t fluoresce suggests that the conversion to their now brittle dehydrated state occurred instantly and completely so no partial products remain to be activated by the ultraviolet light. This suggests a quantum event where a finite amount of energy transferred abruptly. The fact that there are images front and back suggests the radiating particles were released along the gravity vector. The radiation pressure may also help explain why the blood was “lifted cleanly” from the body as it transformed to a resurrected state.”
   https://www.shroud.com/pdfs/moran.pdf

   Moreover, the following article found that it would take 34 Trillion Watts of what is termed VUV (directional) radiation to form the image on the shroud.

   Astonishing discovery at Christ’s tomb supports Turin Shroud – NOV 26TH 2016
   Excerpt: The first attempts made to reproduce the face on the Shroud by radiation, used a CO2 laser which produced an image on a linen fabric that is similar at a macroscopic level. However, microscopic analysis showed a coloring that is too deep and many charred linen threads, features that are incompatible with the Shroud image. Instead, the results of ENEA “show that a short and intense burst of VUV directional radiation can color a linen cloth so as to reproduce many of the peculiar characteristics of the body image on the Shroud of Turin, including shades of color, the surface color of the fibrils of the outer linen fabric, and the absence of fluorescence”.
   ‘However, Enea scientists warn, “it should be noted that the total power of VUV radiations required to instantly color the surface of linen that corresponds to a human of average height, body surface area equal to = 2000 MW/cm2 17000 cm2 = 34 thousand billion watts makes it impractical today to reproduce the entire Shroud image using a single laser excimer, since this power cannot be produced by any VUV light source built to date (the most powerful available on the market come only to several billion watts)”.
   Comment
   The ENEA study of the Holy Shroud of Turin concluded that it would take 34 Thousand Billion (trillion) Watts of VUV radiation to make the image on the shroud. This output of electromagnetic energy remains beyond human technology.
   Per predatormasters

   Thus, when we rightly let the agent causality of God back into the picture of modern physics, (as the Christian founders of modern science originally envisioned), and as quantum physics itself now empirically demands with the closing of the free will loophole, (Zeilinger and company), then a empirically backed reconciliation, (via the Shroud of Turin), between Quantum Mechanics, Special Relativity, (i.e. Quantum Electrodynamics), and General Relativity, i.e. the ‘Theory of Everything’, readily pops out for us in Christ’s resurrection from the dead. i.e. The infinite gap between the eternities of special relativity and general relativity was bridged when Christ was resurrected from the dead.

   Turin Shroud Hologram Reveals The Words “The Lamb”
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Tmka1l8GAQ

   Colossians 1:15-20
   The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy. For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.

   Luke 22:42
   “Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done.”
9. 9
   vmahuna says:

   August 20, 2019 at 9:21 am

   On this read through it occurred to me that for LOTS of humans in the world who have never been TOLD that a doodle with 3 connected straight lines is a “triangle” would NEVER make the mental jump to “ALL doodles with 3 straight sides are SAME shape”. And of course they would NOT naturally call it a “triangle”.
   Similarly, a person who had never seen a “dog” would not naturally conclude that chihuahuas and malamutes were both dogs. Or conversely, I often think that our dog assumes humans are ALSO dogs because why else would we welcome each other when someone returns to the Pack? Going from known examples of specific things to grouping individuals into classes is one of those HUGE leaps in thinking that separates humans from earthworms.