Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Catholics who dissent from spiritualized Darwinism may face lonely trek

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Photo of Jacques Maritain It’s not the Church, exactly; it’s the fashions in who speaks for the church.

The work of biologists and astronomers “had no more ardent supporter” than Jacques Maritain (1882-1973), but

Although he was a giant of twentieth-century philosophy and (according to Pope Paul VI) a seminal influence on the Second Vatican Council, Maritain’s stock among Catholic thinkers was already in sharp decline at the time of his death. Deal Hudson has argued that the cause of this seemingly inexplicable neglect was the scathing critique of Teilhard de Chardin in one of Maritain’s last books, The peasant of the Garonne (1967). Teilhard was an icon of post-Vatican II liberal theology, and Maritain’s dismissal of his philosophy as “one more Christian gnosis … like all gnoses – a bad gnosis” did not sit well with what Maritain referred to as Teilhard’s’ “enraptured ecclesiastical retinue.”

What Maritain objected to was Teilhard’s “purely evolutive conception where being is replaced by becoming and every essence … vanishes.” Maritain had no objection to the theory of evolution per se

– George Sim Johnston: Did Darwin Get It Right?: Catholics and the Theory of Evolution (Our Sunday Visitor, pp. 136-37)

“No objection to the theory of evolution per se ” … But most of the Expelled could say that! They hate what Darwinism has done to the theory, and that’s what got them expelled.

(Note: Etienne Gilson had no use for Teilhardianism either, though he tried to be fair about it.)

Unfortunately, this kind of thing could have qualified Teilhard  for Rev. Michael Dowd’s thirty-three ring circus (holy gasworks!):

To this end, he suggested that the Earth in its evolutionary unfolding, was growing a new organ of consciousness, called the noosphere. The noosphere is analogous on a planetary level to the evolution of the cerebral cortex in humans. The noosphere is a “planetary thinking network” — an interlinked system of consciousness and information, a global net of self-awareness, instantaneous feedback, and planetary communication. At the time of his writing, computers of any merit were the size of a city block, and the Internet was, if anything, an element of speculative science fiction. Yet this evolution is indeed coming to pass, and with a rapidity, that in Gaia time, is but a mere passage of seconds. In these precious moments, the planet is developing her cerebral cortex, and emerging into self-conscious awakening. We are indeed approaching the Omega point that Teilhard de Chardin was so excited about. 

Comments
I have to believe that's better than a world wide wedgie.Mung
May 28, 2011
May
05
May
28
28
2011
08:30 PM
8
08
30
PM
PDT
... or the world-wide wedge!!!Enezio E. De Almeida Filho
May 26, 2011
May
05
May
26
26
2011
01:51 PM
1
01
51
PM
PDT
The noosphere is a “planetary thinking network” — an interlinked system of consciousness and information, a global net of self-awareness, instantaneous feedback, and planetary communication.
If only he'd lived to see the world wide web.Mung
May 26, 2011
May
05
May
26
26
2011
09:06 AM
9
09
06
AM
PDT
This is of related interest: New 'ID The Future' Podcast; When It's Wise to Question the Scientific Consensus - Jay Richards http://intelligentdesign.podomatic.com/player/web/2011-05-25T14_36_06-07_00bornagain77
May 26, 2011
May
05
May
26
26
2011
04:20 AM
4
04
20
AM
PDT
Here in Australia we've got our own Climate Change Commissioner, former Australian of the Year Professor Flannery who spouts the very same nonsense. From Andrew Bolt's blog... Tim Flannery in December outlines his new faith: I think that within this century the concept of the strong Gaia will actually become physically manifest. I do think that the Gaia of the Ancient Greeks, where they believed the earth was effectively one whole and perfect living creature, that doesn’t exist yet, but it will exist in future.... We’ll never be able to control the earth, there’s no doubt about it. We can’t control its systems. But we can nudge them and we can foresee danger. Once that occurs, then the Gaia of the Ancient Greeks really will exist. This planet, this Gaia, will have acquired a brain and a nervous system. That will make it act as a living animal, as a living organism, at some sort of level. Climate Commissioner Flannery now announces success: We have formed a super-organism,… There will be no ‘outside’, there is no ‘other’. We will form a global community with a common set of shared beliefs … We will be a regulating intelligence for the planet. ... Rather sad really. He's a "scientist" - whatever that means these days.ronvanwegen
May 25, 2011
May
05
May
25
25
2011
08:19 PM
8
08
19
PM
PDT

Leave a Reply