Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Devastating take-down of Bill Nye, the science guy

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Jurisprudence Professor Robert George and bioethicist Patrick Lee have written a devastating take-down of Bill Nye in an article for National Review titled, Back to Science Class for the Science Guy, after Nye published a video on YouTube, claiming to tell us what science says about abortion. As take-downs go, this one is about as good as it gets, and I warmly recommend it to readers. The authors write:

…[H]e (Nye) misrepresents the facts from top to bottom in an embarrassingly transparent effort to hijack science in the cause of pro-abortion ideology.

The authors’ conclusion is also worth quoting:

At several points in his video, Nye expresses frustration with people who don’t share his support for the moral and legal permissibility of abortion. One can, perhaps, be forgiven for indulging a chuckle at his exasperation, given the level of scientific ignorance on display from a guy whose whole message to those he disagrees with is “Listen to me, you rubes; I know the science.”

See also Mollie Hemingway’s highly illuminating article, A Quick And Easy Guide To The Planned Parenthood Videos in the Federalist. Videos are embedded for ease of reference. Well worth reading.

Comments are welcome.

Comments
The most disturbing for me of all those videos was when the technician exclaimed! It's a boy! I thought according to liberals that fetuses are not human so how did they know its a boy?Andre
September 30, 2015
September
09
Sep
30
30
2015
05:07 AM
5
05
07
AM
PDT
Seversky said:
The video “stings” on Planned Parenthood, the harassment of their staff and facilities and the campaign to withdraw federal funding are Alinskyite tactics at their most blatant.
No. Portraying those who are against abortion as conducting a "war on women" and those who wish to defund PP as trying to take away women's health care are Alinsky tactics at their most blatant. Legal, peaceful demonstrations and lawful process to defund are not "Alinsky" tactics at all. Taking undercover video and releasing it to the public is hardly in itself an "Alinsky" tactic. They just happen to reveal some very disturbing practices and attitudes.William J Murray
September 30, 2015
September
09
Sep
30
30
2015
04:19 AM
4
04
19
AM
PDT
Imagine being a surviving child of a PP mother, one of their leading lights, perhaps; the recurring thought: 'That could have been me...Axel
September 30, 2015
September
09
Sep
30
30
2015
02:58 AM
2
02
58
AM
PDT
Barry, are you advocating armed conflict? Or would changing the law be sufficient?Bob O'H
September 30, 2015
September
09
Sep
30
30
2015
12:42 AM
12
12
42
AM
PDT
Seversky in 2015:
Whatever we might think of abortion, they are performing a legal procedure that has survived a Supreme Court challenge.
Slavery apologist in 1858:
Whatever we might think about enslaving a man, the masters are exercising their legal right that has survived a Supreme Court challenge.
Sev, you must be so proud.Barry Arrington
September 29, 2015
September
09
Sep
29
29
2015
09:46 PM
9
09
46
PM
PDT
I'm thasnkful to nye for giving the debate with HAM. I never knew Nye before. Yet he showed me he was a jake of all trades and master of none. He didn't do well in defending evolution and just repeated stock points. such a person should not presume to be able to defend conclusions claimed by him to be scientific. Abortionism is another flaw. ay least he shows the issue of when a kid has arrived on the planet IS THE ISSUE. Better then a lot of them.Robert Byers
September 29, 2015
September
09
Sep
29
29
2015
09:38 PM
9
09
38
PM
PDT
Seversky And if you actually knew the science you would immediately know that Bill Nye even got that wrong. But since you think descent with modification and survival of the fittest is also science you can be forgiven for your ignorance and the only advice I can give you is to study the subject in question to evaporate that ignorance. I'll help you; http://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/articles/embryoquotes2.htmlAndre
September 29, 2015
September
09
Sep
29
29
2015
08:42 PM
8
08
42
PM
PDT
Why don't we have a national referendum on abortion?Mapou
September 29, 2015
September
09
Sep
29
29
2015
07:54 PM
7
07
54
PM
PDT
Mung, Ought of course is founded in reality, at its root. An inherently good, thus moral root that is also the source of creation. KFkairosfocus
September 29, 2015
September
09
Sep
29
29
2015
07:29 PM
7
07
29
PM
PDT
Seversky:
The point that both Nye and his critics miss is that science is about what is and the debate about abortion is a moral issue – is this something we ought to be doing – and you cannot derive ‘ought’ from ‘is’.
Why not? Are you some sort of dualist?Mung
September 29, 2015
September
09
Sep
29
29
2015
07:25 PM
7
07
25
PM
PDT
I'm only sorry that we discovered those Alinskyite tactics about 40 years too late. Because when a society (or Western civ as a whole) gets past a certain point, all you can do is slow down the rot by engaging in the only remaining effective tactics, which are destructive in some way. (Sorry to be so upbeat...)EDTA
September 29, 2015
September
09
Sep
29
29
2015
06:46 PM
6
06
46
PM
PDT
Seversky @ 1 That means convincing enough people that the law should be changed Absolutely! But that means there needs to be freedom of all available information so that people can make an informed decision. Far from being "Alinskyite tactics," the videos are in the best tradition of Nellie Bly and other American journalists who exposed abuses of their time. For years Planned Parenthood has been masquerading as purely a women's health and care clinic. Now facts emerge that severely question those claims. If these truths are inconvenient, so be it. But if we are interested in legitimate debate we should welcome transparency and we should welcome facts. Do you welcome those items? Are you willing to consider them with an open mind? The real shame is on the US Media, who got scooped and duped. Worldview blinders can do that to all of us, I guess.Physteach
September 29, 2015
September
09
Sep
29
29
2015
06:29 PM
6
06
29
PM
PDT
The main point of the videos was to highlight the "for profit" trafficing in human body parts by PPH. Deal with that Mr. Seversky instead of trying to deflect the conversation to abortion.ymeynot
September 29, 2015
September
09
Sep
29
29
2015
06:20 PM
6
06
20
PM
PDT
Thank you for reminding us that Abortion is legal, by decree of the United States Supreme Court. Just as the Holocaust was legal, under the provisions of the Enabling Act of 1933, passed in accordance with the Weimar Constitution. Anyhow, regarding a "Human Individual", AKA a Human Being, Science tells us when a Human's life begins. Just as it tells us when a doggies life begins, as well as the life of a kitty, a zebra, or a giraffe. It begins, when the sperm fuses with the ovum to produce a new organism with distinctive DNA that..... blah blah blah. Therefore, abortion is the deliberate killing of an innocent Human Being. That is the definition of "murder". Thus Abortion is state sanctioned, legal, Mass Murder like the Holocaust, only 10 times worse according to my figures. I'm sorry you find these facts to be a distraction, are unhappy that Planned parenthood's staff is "harassed" for crushing the head of babies, and that you disapprove of the tactics of those who wish to stop Mass Murder.chris haynes
September 29, 2015
September
09
Sep
29
29
2015
06:01 PM
6
06
01
PM
PDT
The point that both Nye and his critics miss is that science is about what is and the debate about abortion is a moral issue - is this something we ought to be doing - and you cannot derive 'ought' from 'is'. The video "stings" on Planned Parenthood, the harassment of their staff and facilities and the campaign to withdraw federal funding are Alinskyite tactics at their most blatant. Whatever we might think of abortion, they are performing a legal procedure that has survived a Supreme Court challenge. If you want to stop abortion you must change the law. That means convincing enough people that the law should be changed which I think is not an unachievable goal but it means carrying a debate about what we mean by a human individual - the concept of personhood is a distraction - and the rights that we assign thereto.Seversky
September 29, 2015
September
09
Sep
29
29
2015
05:19 PM
5
05
19
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply