Home
» Intelligent Design » Embryonic Development Reveals Staggering Complexity
Embryonic Development Reveals Staggering Complexity
| January 23, 2018 | Posted by Cornelius Hunter under Intelligent Design |
I recently cited a paper on the evolution of embryonic development and how the evidence contradicts evolutionary theory and common descent. Even the evolutionists, though in understated terms, admitted there were problems. Evolutionary analyses are “reaching their limits,” it is difficult to “conclude anything about evolutionary origins,” genetic similarities “do not necessarily imply common ancestry,” and “conserved regulatory networks can become unrecognizably divergent.” In other words, like all other disciplines within the life sciences, embryonic development is not working. The science contradicts the theory. Read more
4 Responses to Embryonic Development Reveals Staggering Complexity
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Dr. Hunter, you have to love these ‘moments of honesty’ from Darwinists:
That is getting dangerously close to actually identifying “Who” the designer must be! 🙂
Perhaps we can get a refund for all of our Richard Dawkins & Jerry Coyne books.
So what we have is further evidence that Evolution is not the result of a scientific inquiry. To most of it’s adherents, its religious positioning dressed up in a lot of bluster.
I was in a Evolution discussion thread yesterday on another blog and it was mostly people regurgitating the popular Evolutionary Ideas they’ve been told are “fact”. It had nothing to do with anyone’s presenting actual knowledge of the subject.
I’m sounding like a broken record again, but my experience tells me that as soon as you see the word “evolution” introduced into a discussion, assume you aren’t going to get a reasonable discussion with the person who used it, at least online, anyway.
Andrew
Where there’s a will, there’s a way.
Oh… wait…