Scientists have found a 47-million-year-old human ancestor. Discovered in Messel Pit, Germany, the fossil, described as Darwinius masillae, is 20 times older than most fossils that explain human evolution.
That fossil doesn’t “explain” human evolution; it complicates the picture.
The theory that was gaining ground was that humans were descended from tarsier-like creatures, but this fossil, touted as a primate ancestor, is a lemur-like creature.
Often, I hear from people attempting to patch the cracks in the unguided Darwinian evolution theory, as follows: “We have more information than ever!”
Yes, but what if it is – as in this case – the evidence is contradictory?
Evidence for Theory A subtracts from evidence for Theory B. So if A is right, B must be subtracted from the total. If B is right, A must be subtracted from the total.
Surely, that is pretty obvious. But watching the spin machine in high gear is a fascinating exercise anyway.
No wonder fewer and fewer believe Darwinism.