Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Mark Pallen is Half Right (And All Wrong)

Cornelius Hunter
November 25, 2011
Intelligent Design
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Evolutionist Mark Pallen asks “Is it possible to be a rationalist (a believer in the laws of logic) but not believe in evolution?” Pallen’s answers is “no,” which seems almost correct. Evolution arose from religious rationalism and today dominates rationalist thought. Can you find a rationalist who does not believe in evolution?  Read more

Comments
“Is it possible to be a rationalist (a believer in the laws of logic) but not believe in evolution?” Would those be the same laws of logic that Pallen's buddies in the evo-psych department have been telling us evolved just to win arguments and not to find objective truth?Deuce
November 25, 2011
November
11
Nov
25
25
2011
10:09 AM
10
10
09
AM
PDT
The question I would raise is why would a materialist believe in immaterial laws of logic?geoffrobinson
November 25, 2011
November
11
Nov
25
25
2011
09:57 AM
9
09
57
AM
PDT
Strange that Mark never provided a definition of "evolution".Joe
November 25, 2011
November
11
Nov
25
25
2011
06:16 AM
6
06
16
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply