Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Naturalism’s Moral Foundations

Categories
Culture
Ethics
Intelligent Design
Religion
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Jeffrey DahmerJeffrey Dahmer: “If it all happens naturalistically, what’s the need for a God? Can’t I set my own rules? Who owns me? I own myself.” [Biography, “Jeffrey Dahmer: The Monster Within,” A&E, 1996.]

Naturalists like to stress that you don’t need God or religion to be good. Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins even suggest that leaving God out of the equation actually allows one to be more moral because then our moral acts are authentic, motivated by deep conviction rather than by having a divine gun to our heads.

Even so, Dahmer’s logic is compelling. We need some external reference point — God — to justify being good. And that justification is significant in its own right. Without it, we can still rationalize particular evils, but we cannot dispense with the category of evil entirely.

I’d like to encourage in this thread other quotes like Dahmer’s — quotes by people who understood the logic of naturalism and the destruction of moral foundations that it entails.

Comments
Nakashima,
I agree we need an external reference point to justify, perhaps even to define, being good. But the leap to the idea that the only valid external reference point is God is not one I agree with, nor do I agree that there is only one valid conception of God that can act as such an external reference point.
Then what are your suggestions?Clive Hayden
February 17, 2010
February
02
Feb
17
17
2010
12:02 PM
12
12
02
PM
PDT
I agree we need an external reference point to justify, perhaps even to define, being good. But the leap to the idea that the only valid external reference point is God is not one I agree with, nor do I agree that there is only one valid conception of God that can act as such an external reference point.Nakashima
February 17, 2010
February
02
Feb
17
17
2010
11:48 AM
11
11
48
AM
PDT
1 5 6 7

Leave a Reply