Genetics Intelligent Design

Only a small portion of the human genome is unique

Spread the love

Geneticists:

Many humans carry genes from Neanderthals, a legacy of past admixture. Existing methods detect this archaic hominin ancestry within human genomes using patterns of linkage disequilibrium or direct comparison to Neanderthal genomes. Each of these methods is limited in sensitivity and scalability. We describe a new ancestral recombination graph inference algorithm that scales to large genome-wide datasets and demonstrate its accuracy on real and simulated data. We then generate a genome-wide ancestral recombination graph including human and archaic hominin genomes. From this, we generate a map within human genomes of archaic ancestry and of genomic regions not shared with archaic hominins either by admixture or incomplete lineage sorting. We find that only 1.5 to 7% of the modern human genome is uniquely human. We also find evidence of multiple bursts of adaptive changes specific to modern humans within the past 600,000 years involving genes related to brain development and function.

An ancestral recombination graph of human, Neanderthal, and Denisovan genomes By Nathan K. Schaefer, Beth Shapiro, Richard E. Green Science Advances16 Jul 2021 : Eabc0776

The paper is open access.

It’s interesting but why should it be a surprise? Only a small portion of the English language is unique, for example. Almost all of it depends on previous languages. And all languages depend on previous languages, going back to … we don’t know where? The good thing about mysteries is that they are fun.

2 Replies to “Only a small portion of the human genome is unique

  1. 1
    jerry says:

    The genome only makes proteins which are like building materials. So other species need the same building materials.

    What differentiates each species are some unique proteins, instructions that express or suppress certain protein expression but most importantly architectural blueprints for that species that are not in the genome.

    It is the last part that mainly determines what the entity will be. At present we have no clue where this architectural plan is or how it is activated.

    So we are like a banana or mouse in small ways but not in the really important ways.

  2. 2
    johnnyb says:

    Strange – I would consider all of the groups under consideration as “human”.

Leave a Reply