Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

People’s Choice Awards: Our most read stories August 2013


(Top three in January (here), February here), March here), April (here), May (here), June here, July here.)

August is summer camp month and the season of hot weather stories in media. No surprise, the runaway favourite was #1 below:

1. Sal Cordova: Breaking News: Michael Shermer issues cease and desist order against PZ Myers

With due respect to victims of real sexual assault, I nevertheless filed this post under humor because of the behavior in the internet landscape in the aftermath of PZ’s original post.

File:A small cup of coffee.JPG

Stars and garters. And #2 seems to have overworked the crushed ice machine as well:

2. Sal Cordova: Atheists vs. Atheists, A+ Skepchick FTB Atheists vs. Skeptic SI CFI JREF Atheists

The discussion highlights that atheists are accusing other atheists of certain misdeeds. I’m not taking sides, but which ever side is right, this cannot be a good thing for a community that presents itself as prophets leading us to the promised land of an atheistic utopia. I have many atheist friends, in an ironic sort of way some atheist writing led me to Christianity (I have a great love of Bertran Russell’s writings, for example).

Though I disagree with atheism, I respect the viewpoint, however, I don’t respect some of the behaviors going on. If the accusations are true, this is really bad, and if the accusations are false, this is still bad as well. This is a lose-lose situation for the skeptic community (mostly atheists). I’m not taking sides as to the truthfulness of the accusations, save to say I hope the accusations are false especially in the case of Michael Shermer who seems like one of the most decent fellows I’ve ever met.

By now the gossip mill is probably working with all fresh material.

Meanwhile, back at the plant:

3. Vince Torley: Evolution vs. God: A Review (of Ray Comfort’s film)

Exposure of conformist thinking among college students: A

(Universities are supposed to be places where people question received ideas, reject authority and learn to think for themselves. But I was shocked to see how many of the biology students interviewed by Ray Comfort eventually admitted that their belief in evolution was based on trust in what the experts say. What this really means is that the intellectual case for the neo-Darwinian theory of evolution has become too complex for the average college student to grasp. Notwithstanding the commendable efforts of some scientists to simplify it to a level accessible to that of the average layperson, it appears that many people feel bamboozled by the claims and counter-claims, and have resolved to go with the scientific consensus, as it’s the path of least resistance. That is a great pity. Darwin’s theory of evolution, unlike the theory of continental drift, makes metaphysical claims which affect your entire perception of yourself, and how you choose to live. To allow an expert – no matter how learned – to decide whether you should accept such a theory is to surrender your whole self-concept, your world-view and your ethical beliefs – for Darwinism impinges on all of these – to the judgment of another person. It is intellectual suicide.)

Effectiveness of interviewing technique: B
(If Ray Comfort’s aim was to make evolutionists look uninformed, then his interviewing technique was moderately successful. If his aim was to look better-informed than his interviewees, then it flopped. See below.)

Fairness of editing: C-minus

(I’m old-fashioned enough to believe that the fairest way to examine a controversial issue is to look at the best arguments mounted by both sides. I was disappointed that the evolutionists’ best arguments were never even mentioned in Ray Comfort’s movie. While the opinions of the interviewees were fairly accurately represented on the whole, it was patently obvious from watching the movie that their responses were heavily edited, with the aim of making them look foolish. I suspect that the professors who were interviewed by Comfort had a lot more to say, but that much of what they said was left on the cutting room floor – which is a real pity. The movie would have been much more effective if the professors interviewed had been allowed to talk at greater length: as the saying goes, give a man enough rope and he’ll hang himself.) More.

Follow UD News at Twitter!

It's okay to love your pets, as long as you don't love your pets, Skatje. "Deep meaningful" relationships also do not require sexual intercourse. Please learn the difference between sex and love. Your dad might be able to explain this to you. Barb
Sal, you come up with stories no one else found. It's also true that, in the news business, time of year is relevant to size of following for human interest stories. News
No surprise, the runaway favourite was #1 below: 1. Sal Cordova: Breaking News: Michael Shermer issues cease and desist order against PZ Myers
That article had more readers than anything I've published on the net in years probably only 2nd to the article I wrote elsewhere making fun of a remark by PZ Myer's daughter Skatje who gave her approval of human animal sexual relations. See: S cordova A--hole of the year
Sexual relationships between humans and animals come as such a shock to people, but it doesn’t to me. There can be very deep, meaningful relationships between humans and their pets. Skatje Myers (daughter of Darwinist PZ Myers)
PZ Myers has never forgiven me for quoting his daughter. He went ballistic over that. (Hey PZ, maybe you should chide your daughter for saying such things, I'm only reporting what she said. Don't shoot the messenger.) Such articles were the most content-free articles I've written. They were consumed for the entertainment value for those who like tabloid drama. Thanks News for recapping the year for me. My most read articles were about atheism, not ID! scordova

Leave a Reply