Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Sheffield University: Darwin ruled “problematic” figure due to racism

Categories
Darwinism
Intelligent Design
Racism
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Had to happen:

A university has been slammed by academics for putting Charles Darwin on a list of ‘racist’ scientists as part of a guide to ‘decolonise’ its biology curriculum.

Sheffield University has created a handbook for students and lecturers in its science department to help ‘tackle racial injustice’ by ‘reflecting on the whiteness and Eurocentrism of our science’.

As part of the guide, the department created a list of 11 ‘problematic’ scientific figures – including Darwin – whose views ‘influenced the type of research they carried out and how they interpreted their data’.

William Cole, “Sheffield University tells staff Charles Darwin was ‘racist’ and used natural selection theory to justify white male superiority in ‘decolonising curriculum’ lecturing handbook” at Daily Mail

Author William Cole emphasizes Darwin’s opposition to slavery but one of his quoted experts puts that in perspective: “Professor James Moore, a biographer of Darwin, told The Telegraph: ‘Almost everyone in Darwin’s day was “racist” in 21st century terms, not only scientists and naturalists but even anti-slavery campaigners and abolitionists.”

Of course. There’s no reason why a racist couldn’t also be a passionate abolitionist. Whatever a person may believe about human equality, slavery is a corrupting influence on any society.

A wiser approach to fighting back would be to pry Woke administrators and faculty loose from employment, wherever possible. Choosing between them and civilization should not be difficult.

The article provides a whole list of non-woke historically significant scientists about to be subjected to whatever the Woke have in store for them, mostly post-mortem. That should be an incentive.

Hat tip: Ken Francis, co-author with Theodore Dalrymple of The Terror of Existence: From Ecclesiastes to Theatre of the Absurd

Comments
SA said:
That which we hold in great honor or esteem and give our greatest love to, is that which we worship.
I agree. I worship my wife.William J Murray
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
08:30 AM
8
08
30
AM
PDT
Sandy and Jerry, I guess it never occurred to you that most people hold a diversity of views than span the spectrum from left to right. As an example, I am a fiscal conservative but support universal health care. I oppose abortion but support same sex marriage. Throwing labels at people is divisive and gets us nowhere. You are free to continue to do so but it says more about you than it does about the views you oppose.paige
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
08:28 AM
8
08
28
AM
PDT
Paige I see that we are still using labels to demonize those with different opinions rather than constructively discuss the issues.
Haha, cancel culture is on the left go preach to leftists about "constructively discuss the issues".Sandy
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
07:42 AM
7
07
42
AM
PDT
I see that we are still using labels to demonize those with different opinions rather than constructively discuss the issues.
Would you be happy if I said white Democrat politicians. It's their policies.
Could you be more specific about the kind of adverse effects you’re thinking of?
Fatherless children, victim ideology both generated by while liberals which led to gangster rap culture. All have been disastrous. Want a name, Michael Harrington. His ideas became the policy of the Democratic Party and created one of the most dysfunctional societies in the history of the world. Very little to do with what people call racism. But very much a racist policy based on low expectations for a group of people by another group (white liberal politicians) who take advantage of them.jerry
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
07:22 AM
7
07
22
AM
PDT
I see that we are still using labels to demonize those with different opinions rather than constructively discuss the issues.paige
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
07:13 AM
7
07
13
AM
PDT
Sev
Incomprehensible as it might be to some, there are others who feel no urge to “worship” anything at all.
That which we hold in great honor or esteem and give our greatest love to, is that which we worship. Merriam Webster: to regard with great or extravagant respect, honor, or devotionSilver Asiatic
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
06:11 AM
6
06
11
AM
PDT
Atheistic-leftism attacks black church communities, promotes abortion in black neighborhoods (Margaret Sanger), substituted propaganda for education in schools and destroys family life - attacking all the cornerstones of healthy life for the black people. Much of this was opposed by the pastors and community leaders (MLK was a Christian leader) but leftism has been relentless and destructive. I'll add that attacks against "patriarchy" have been destructive for black men - leading to many social problems.Silver Asiatic
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
06:07 AM
6
06
07
AM
PDT
Jerry: White liberals/leftists. Could you be more specific about the kind of adverse effects you're thinking of?JVL
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
05:53 AM
5
05
53
AM
PDT
Probably one of the greatest researchers and writers today is Marian L. Tupy. He writes for the Cato Institute and Human Progress. He tweeted this today
When we trade with other nations, we often resent them and suspect them of thriving at our expense. Of course, trade is mutually beneficial. But humans evolved to be suspicious of exchange with people beyond their immediate group.
https://mobile.twitter.com/HumanProgress/status/1391943662322556929 This shows suspicion of others different from ourselves is built in. Hayek said
Part of our present difficulty is that we must constantly adjust our lives, our thoughts and our emotions, in order to live simultaneously within different kinds of orders according to different rules. If we were to apply the unmodified, uncurbed rules of the micro-cosmos (i.e., of the small band or troop, or of, say, our families) to the macro-cosmos (our wider civilization), as our instincts and sentimental yearnings often make us wish to do, we would destroy it. Yet if we were always to apply the rules of the extended order to our more intimate groupings, we would crush them. So we must learn to live in two sorts of world at once.
jerry
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
05:35 AM
5
05
35
AM
PDT
What accounts for them?
White liberals/leftists.jerry
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
03:17 AM
3
03
17
AM
PDT
A "racist" country elected a black president twice , unfortunatelly not for his performances but for his skin.His best "performances" :legalized of same sex marriage , started wars with 5 , 6 countries , gifted pallets of cash to terorist regimes.Sandy
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
12:33 AM
12
12
33
AM
PDT
Jerry: I have never said that Black Americans do not have an extremely tough time in life. These adverse effects experienced in life lead to performance differences. But is that due to racism? There is no evidence that it is the cause for the differences. These charts specifically don’t present any indication of racism, just stark differences in performance. What are the 'adverse effects experienced in life' that you're considering? What accounts for them?JVL
May 11, 2021
May
05
May
11
11
2021
12:00 AM
12
12
00
AM
PDT
Seversky Is “worship” in our genes? Incomprehensible as it might be to some, there are others who feel no urge to “worship” anything at all.
So your "mind " is synonimous for "nothing at all"? :) You said it.Sandy
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
11:55 PM
11
11
55
PM
PDT
Finally. As I've said for years, Darwinism is a failed 19th century conjecture used to justify colonialism and racial manifest destiny. Darwinists have consistently failed to find the evidence showing a gradual transformation across many species and every new discovery seems to send them into a frenzy of rationalization. For example, embryonic development was once claimed to follow evolutionary pathways (they didn't), there was supposedly a plethora of "vestigial" organs that proved evolution (they weren't), there were fossils to be found that would supposedly bridge the gaps in the smooth flow of evolution (they're still missing), similarity of proteins between species was once touted as the solution to classification controversies (until it was discovered that it doesn't work), then there was "junk" DNA that was supposedly the trail of evolutionary progress (it's now called "non-coding" DNA), and others--all of which were falsified. Yet Darwin fundamentalists cling to them for dear life even in the face of science and in the face of the blatant racism of Darwin and his followers that even resulted in the poor African Mbuti, Ota Benga, being exhibited in monkey house at the Bronx Zoo for about two years. Now that was never mentioned in our textbooks! Instead, kids are still taught the "fact" of evolution. Good riddance! -QQuerius
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
09:41 PM
9
09
41
PM
PDT
Seversky’s shiny thing worked - so - back to Darwin. Darwin conceived that there is a hierarchy among humans and it is in the nature of hierarchies that there are degrees of merit. He held that white Europeans were further from apes than other ‘races,’ and other ‘races’ were therefore closer to apes. He explicitly stated that in some future period …”civilised races…will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races;” he named the negro, with the Australian aboriginal as the first of the ‘savage races’ to disappear. Indeed, Darwin’s sub-title for his Origin of Species is ‘Preservation of Favoured Races.’Belfast
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
08:56 PM
8
08
56
PM
PDT
undermines attempts to address real racism.
I’m arguing that racism is not a major issue but something else is. If you address the wrong issue you will never solve the problem. The left argues racism because they are responsible for the real problem and will never admit it. They will never risk the votes they would lose if the truth was addressed. In the Chauvin/ Floyd incident two of the four police officers were minorities. One was black and one was Southeast Asian.jerry
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
08:55 PM
8
08
55
PM
PDT
Sev, >Perhaps the first step to eradicating racism is to accept that it exists – at least the seeds of it – in all of us... But because the seeds of it exist in all of us, it will never be permenantly eradicated. In fact, it will take continuous conscious effort just to keep it in check. Same with sexism and a lot of other -isms. They are rooted in our instincts (or for the Christian, our instincts plus our sin nature). For that reason, they will always rear their ugly heads unless continuous effort is expended to keep them in check. That'll cheer ya up!EDTA
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
06:34 PM
6
06
34
PM
PDT
Is "worship" in our genes? Incomprehensible as it might be to some, there are others who feel no urge to "worship" anything at all.Seversky
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
06:21 PM
6
06
21
PM
PDT
I think that article is making an unwarraned leap by attributing all of the negative outcomes to racism. Using a single characteristic without any context to make a correlation is problematic. By that standard, sexism would be implicated in the 90% male vs 10% female prison population, 70% male vs 30% female homeless rate, 70% male vs 30% female suicide rate, 76% male vs 24% female murder victim rate. Sexism doesn't account for those things. There are other factors, and presenting those statistics as evidence of sexism is misleading. This doesn't (and isn't an attempt to) answer JVLs question, but it is related. The lengths people go to to ascribe bad outscomes to racism in this country give the appearance that racism is significantly less than claimed. Derek Chauvin was the poster boy for systemic police racism, but he wasn't charged with a hate crime because there was no evidence that race was a factor. https://www.insider.com/no-evidence-to-charge-derek-chauvin-with-hate-crime-prosecutor-2021-4 Anybody that could have found evidence of racism would have been a hero to millions, so it was certainly looked for. Of course that doesn't stop people from claiming that his actions were racist and that the police are racist. It's circular reasoning, and it undermines attempts to address real racism.davidl1
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
05:01 PM
5
05
01
PM
PDT
Interesting statistics.
I rest my case. Nothing in these charts indicates racism. They have been well known for years. I have never said that Black Americans do not have an extremely tough time in life. These adverse effects experienced in life lead to performance differences. But is that due to racism? There is no evidence that it is the cause for the differences. These charts specifically don’t present any indication of racism, just stark differences in performance.jerry
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
03:58 PM
3
03
58
PM
PDT
Paige Interesting statistics. https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/us-systemic-racism-in-charts-graphs-data-2020-6%3famp
"interesting" is synonimous for "fake"?Sandy
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
03:47 PM
3
03
47
PM
PDT
Interesting statistics. https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/us-systemic-racism-in-charts-graphs-data-2020-6%3famppaige
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
02:39 PM
2
02
39
PM
PDT
JVL, Jerry emphatically requested that you prove him wrong. You seem to have misread his comment. ;) Andrewasauber
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
01:06 PM
1
01
06
PM
PDT
Some people don't realize that worshipping is in the "DNA" of every human. Those who reject God ...worship guess what? Dumb human ideologies. Garbages. Theists, atheists ,all humanity worship something.
JVL
Jerry: The United States is currently the least racists country in the history of the world. Prove me wrong!!!
What evidence or data has led to you having that conclusion?
...Sandy
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
12:42 PM
12
12
42
PM
PDT
The only one crying racism are liberals especially white liberals. By nature they lie continually. They have to lie since most of their positions are based on fallacies. QEDjerry
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
12:07 PM
12
12
07
PM
PDT
Jerry: The United States is currently the least racists country in the history of the world. Prove me wrong!!! What evidence or data has led to you having that conclusion?JVL
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
09:44 AM
9
09
44
AM
PDT
Perhaps the first step to eradicating racism is to accept that it exists – at least the seeds of it
Prove me wrong!!! The United States is currently the least racists country in the history of the world. Prove me wrong!!! The most racist persons in the 21st century are those who say racism is an issue. jerry
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
06:43 AM
6
06
43
AM
PDT
@Seversky @1. Decoded your message. It reads; “leave Darwin alone - shiny thing over there”Belfast
May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
02:50 AM
2
02
50
AM
PDT
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! It was only a matter of timeAaronS1978
May 9, 2021
May
05
May
9
09
2021
10:29 PM
10
10
29
PM
PDT
Academia is always ruled by fashion and orthodoxy. If you let a censorship fad run, it sooner or later erases people who count. Darwin is people who count. When the fashionistas realize that they can no longer start every sentence with "evolved", the hunters will slow down. This is why job-style training is infinitely better than education by lecture. Nature itself can't be erased or censored. Nature doesn't care what we believe. Crossbreeding plants, or running a gene-splicing machine, works the same whether you believe Darwin or Behe.polistra
May 9, 2021
May
05
May
9
09
2021
10:27 PM
10
10
27
PM
PDT
1 2 3 4

Leave a Reply