Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Still missing: The missing link between apes and us

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

It ought to be so simple, right? Planet of the Apes and all that. From Colin Barras at BBC:

It is true that, today, some researchers have a well-thought-through idea of what the LCA looked like and how it behaved. The trouble is that other researchers have equally well-reasoned models that suggest an LCA that looked and behaved in a completely different way. And that puts the research community in a bit of a quandary.

In principle, fossilised remains of the LCA might come to light any time. They might even be discovered this very year. But because there is so little agreement on what the LCA should look like, researchers will interpret the fossils differently.

“It’s a problem that we might encounter,” says Almécija. “Are we going to be able to recognise the LCA when we find it?” More.

The trouble is, in that case, we don’t know what we are looking for and thus cannot be sure if we find it.

See also: Does the evidence point to mankind’s fully natural origin ?

and

The search for our earliest ancestors: signals in the noise

Comments
Dio, this equation looks positively scientific. Can you tell me where you got it from? I'd like to examine the original author's thoughts on the various factors, and his/her take on them. Please don't self-referrance to comment 1296.66 on thread BB-GT. I want the original creators of this equation please! Thanks:) The Last Common Ancestor is theorised to be the one where we diverged from chimps, 6 to 7 million years ago. How it looked would be something similar to a chimp. How it acted can only be guessed at. But by looking at primate behaviour today, some informed guesses can be made. This is all speculation you say, and you are right. Here's a question; What's the alternative? Throw up our hands as the ID community and creationists do? No thank you.rvb8
July 18, 2017
July
07
Jul
18
18
2017
05:57 PM
5
05
57
PM
PDT
Well, there's no free lunch. In case they finally find it and agree on it, let them know it has to pass the evo-devo test to answer the most important question: where's the beef? Here's a brief summary of the test: Given any case of known macro-evolutionary divergence, it could be described as: Dev(d1) = Dev(ca) + Delta(d1) Dev(d2) = Dev(ca) + Delta(d2) Where Dev(x) is the developmental process of any given biological system x Delta(x) is the whole set of spatiotemporal procedural differences required to produce Dev(x). d1 and d2 are two descendants of their common ancestor (ca). Assuming the Dev(x) are well known, what hypothetical Delta(d1) and Delta(d2) could be suggested for their missing link case? Just point to the literature that explains this in details. The explanation must be comprehensive, logically coherent and it must hold water under any kind of thorough examination. This test was suggested @1026 & 1090 in the thread "A third way of evolution?"Dionisio
July 18, 2017
July
07
Jul
18
18
2017
02:57 PM
2
02
57
PM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply