Intelligent Design

Those Wacky Libertarians on Lew Rockwell Dot Com

Spread the love

Another great article on Lew Rockwell dot com.

Evolution, Creationism, and Intelligent Design
by Charley Reese

I am an agnostic when it comes to explaining the origin of life. I don’t believe yet in evolution, creationism or intelligent design. I can see flaws in all three. I just simply don’t know and frankly don’t think it matters whether we know or not.

My main conflict with the evolutionists is that they wish to assert their theory as fact and to employ government power to ban discussion of creationism and intelligent design on the grounds that they are unscientific or, worse from their point of view, religious. I am against banning any idea, theory, speculation or body of guesses. Human history shows us to be far too error-prone to go around eliminating dissent by majority vote of one of the more ignorant classes in our society, namely politicians.

Science has been itching to replace religion in Western culture for some time. You can see for yourself how science assumes the characteristics of religion. There is the priesthood (scientists, or at least those who call themselves scientists) and laity, which is the rest of us. Theory becomes dogma. Dissenters are persecuted. The high priests of science want the government not only to fund them, but to enforce their dogmas with the power of the law.

I believe in the separation of church and state. I also believe in the separation of science and state. In fact, I believe in the separation of practically all aspects of life from the state, which should basically tote the mail and guard the coast.

We, as mortals with short life spans, would not even be concerned about the origins of life, except the evolutionists wish to use their theory to destroy religion, and religious people want to use their theory to defend religion.

True science means simply the search for truth, but a search conducted with an open mind and tolerance for dissent. There is nothing wrong with a person believing that a dinosaur evolved into a canary, but there is also nothing wrong with someone believing that God created the first man and woman. I’ve never seen any physical evidence to support either belief, and one is no more improbable than the other. The only fact is that some beliefs have to be accepted on the basis of faith, and that goes for evolution as well as creationism.

The trouble is that both science and religion provide a person with a worldview, and unconsciously the person begins to evaluate everything he or she sees or hears or thinks up in accordance with the worldview. I see no reason to include any discussion of evolution or creationism in secondary schools. There is a large volume of facts biology students need to learn without wasting their time on theories that have no practical value. It’s like teaching molecular physics to students studying auto mechanics.

There is always more to learn than there is time to learn it, so we should be more practical in designing our school curricula. Not every student needs to read Shakespeare or learn calculus. I’ve had no occasion to solve a quadratic equation since I left high school. Students should be taught only what will be useful to them. Survey courses – giving them a taste of what is on the large menu of learning – are useful. Practical courses, such as personal finance or typing, are useful. Teaching all children a second language would be extremely useful, as would be music and drawing.

9 Replies to “Those Wacky Libertarians on Lew Rockwell Dot Com

  1. 1
    Upright BiPed says:

    So thats what fresh air smells like.

  2. 2
    Gods iPod says:

    tote the mail?

    That’s not a libertarian position.

  3. 3
    DaveScot says:

    iPod

    Sure it is. Libertarians are not anarchists. They’re just closer to anarchists than either Republicans or Democrats.

    The central government of the United States was supposed to be very limited and serve three basic functions for the states and the people: establish a common currency, regulate interstate commerce, and establish a common defense. “Toting the mail” is a metaphor for those things.

  4. 4
    Ekstasis says:

    As a side note, The United States Postal Service is not a government agency, although it is quasi-government. The Federal government established it as an official monopoly, it is illegal for you or I to carry and deliver a letter without postage, except within a facility or “campus”. Commercial express companies such as FedEx and DHL operate under an exemption for quick delivery.

  5. 5
    Ekstasis says:

    Reese makes a good point. I wonder if we could commission a study to survey and evaluate successful doctors, nurses, wildlife management specialists, and pharmacists, and determine whether they believe in NDE, and exactly how that belief assisted them in their practical knowledge, skills, and aptitude for their jobs.

    I suspect that there will be little or no correlation, and a total absence of information on how NDE played a role. Armed with this knowledge, perhaps we could break the lock on the false premise that “Darwinian evolution is the key to modern biology, without which civilization would simply crumble”.

    Materialists, may I ask you a simple question? The last time you visited a physician, did you ask him or her whether they were a NDE adherent? Did you reject the services of a surgeon because, Darwin forbid, he or she could be some closet ID or creationist freak?

  6. 6
    idnet.com.au says:

    “Students should be taught only what will be useful to them” A true utilitarian.

  7. 7
    alan says:

    “except the evolutionists wish to use their theory to destroy religion,” – his most salient point, I think – Psalm 2 verse 1&2 – read it.

  8. 8
    JPCollado says:

    I have more respect for agnostics. At least they are humble and are not in the habit of overestimating the supposed powers of human cognition and science.

    Yeah, “fundies say the darndest things.”

  9. 9
    DaveScot says:

    ekstasis

    You needn’t bother medical doctors about how much they know of ToE. It should be sufficient to know that no medical degree program requires taking a class in evolutionary biology.

    Amazing. The so-called unifying principle of all biology doesn’t have to be studied by medical doctors and surgeons. Kind of puts the importance of it in perspective there, doesn’t it? πŸ™‚

Leave a Reply