Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Tree of life has complexity at its roots

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

A new find has shocked scientists who didn’t imagine the earliest critter could be so complex. “This was a complete shocker,” said study team member Casey Dunn of Brown University in Rhode Island. “So shocking that we initially thought something had gone very wrong.”

 

“Our data reinforce several previously identified clades that split deeply in the animal tree, unambiguously resolving multiple long-standing issues. We find strong support for the placement of ctenophores (comb jellies) as the earliest diverging extant multicellular animals. A single origin of spiral cleavage (with subsequent losses) is inferred from well-supported nodes. A diminishing number of lineages remain recalcitrant to placement on the tree.

The spiral cleavage programme, a complex and highly stereotyped mode of early embryonic development, is present in at least Annelida, Entoprocta, Mollusca, Nemertea and Platyhelminthes. If corroborated by further analyses this would have major implications for early animal evolution, indicating either that sponges have been greatly simplified, or that the complex morphology of ctenophores has arisen independently from that of other metazoans.”

Casey W. Dunn et al Nature Vol 452  10 April 2008 p745  (thanks bFast)

Comments
However, ID is a secular science. So am more ID friendly inference from this inference was that snakes originally had legs. Like that frog who had lungs but then lost them because it breathed through it's skin. Then again, whoever the designer is, maybe it does control speciation and microevolution.DeepDesign
April 11, 2008
April
04
Apr
11
11
2008
05:46 AM
5
05
46
AM
PDT
tb (tuburculosis??) This is an an interesting find. Doesn't say anything very profound about evolution, however. Interesting the Bible of all sources, informs the modern reader that the serpent originally had legs. Which is a startling claim from ancient man.DeepDesign
April 11, 2008
April
04
Apr
11
11
2008
05:31 AM
5
05
31
AM
PDT
OFF-TOPIC That more interesting title is here: Missing Link Found It does also deserve a topic to be opened about!tb
April 11, 2008
April
04
Apr
11
11
2008
04:07 AM
4
04
07
AM
PDT
Considering the contents, it is an extremely tame title. Why is that? Good question. A one-cent answer could perhaps be: "To avoid that some interested guy does actually find how much new research add more and more arguments to those silly believers in ID ..."kairos
April 11, 2008
April
04
Apr
11
11
2008
03:49 AM
3
03
49
AM
PDT
One thing I found particularly interesting about this paper is its title "Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life". I missed noticing the paper at all, when as usual I was fishing in Nature index, for ID relevant papers. Considering the contents, it is an extremely tame title. Why is that?idnet.com.au
April 11, 2008
April
04
Apr
11
11
2008
12:56 AM
12
12
56
AM
PDT
1 2

Leave a Reply