“The findings of the … paper were peer reviewed and published in the world’s premier scientific journal and were given wide coverage in the English-speaking media,” Lewis wrote. “Despite this, a quick review of the first page of the paper was sufficient to raise doubts as to the accuracy of its results.”
Really? A casual review of the first page by one person with a modicum of skepticism found issues that a whole team of experts missed in their peer review process? Yes. Why? Easy. When it comes to climate change, the politics come first. Facts take the hindmost. And sometimes that winds up biting them in their, ahem, nether regions, shall we say.