Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Would Gaia worship or panpsychism be a better religion for climate change hysterics?

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

We ask on account of this paper on how to talk to people who think that climate change isn’t as bad as many are making out:

Although efforts to sway climate deniers may seem futile, the researchers found four approaches in peer-reviewed studies from the past two years that could be most effective:

1. Reframing solutions to climate change as ways to uphold the social system and work toward its stability and longevity

2. Reducing the ideological divide by incorporating the purity of the Earth, rather than how we harm or care for it

3. Having conversations about the scientific consensus around climate change with trusted individuals

4. Encouraging people to explicitly discuss their values and stance on climate change prior to engaging with climate information

Wong-Parodi said she found the fourth approach to be the most intriguing because less research has been done in that area than the other three — and it seems to have a lot of potential for behavior change. Stanford’s School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences, “Pathways to changing the minds of climate deniers” at ScienceDaily

Paper.

Our physics color commentator Rob Sheldon was intrigued by all this and offers a thought:

Summarizing then, in order to accept global warming we need to appeal to

(1) SJW,

(2) Gaia worship,

(3) politics,

(4) values.

Wow. Not once is it seen as a problem in epistemology–finding the truth. Did I just see Stanford’s School of Earth Sciences saying that facts aren’t important any more?

Actually, the very idea of “facts,” in Sheldon’s sense, is in dispute today. Cf the current war on objectivity.

Given all that, the Earth sciences people might be happier with Gaia worship—at least in the respectable form of panpsychism or the conscious universe.

Look on the bright side: They aren’t calling for dissent from their views—or, maybe later, ravings—to be made a crime. People who feel they are fighting an apocalyptic menace often go that way.

Takehome Point: Whatever your religion, it is better not to be a hysteric or listen to such.

Panpsychism: You are conscious but so is your coffee mug (Choose the panpsychism that suits you.)

Comments
You bring up a good point. Three or four years ago the climate loonies were OFTEN calling for "denial" to be a crime. Now they're just calling for "deniers" to be slaughtered on sight.polistra
January 19, 2020
January
01
Jan
19
19
2020
10:39 AM
10
10
39
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply