Medicine News Peer review

Clinical research mostly not useful; news tsunami anyway?

Spread the love

From Gary Schwitzer at Health News Review:

Since many papers on clinical research spawn, in turn, dozens or hundreds of news stories, one can easily see how a tsunami of not-ready-for-prime-time medical research news and information drowns the public daily. Ioannidis makes this link with one line in his article – “Public media and related commentators of health news [53] may also help by focusing on the need to obtain clinically useful research and not compromise for less.” That citation is a paper we published about our work. More.

Truth to tell, science writing has not always been a gift to science research. Like peer review, it must be evaluated every now and then.

See also: Butter will not kill you!

Keep up to date with Retraction Watch

Follow UD News at Twitter!

One Reply to “Clinical research mostly not useful; news tsunami anyway?

  1. 1
    EDTA says:


    Perhaps this: “fMRI bugs could upend years of research”, will get us a tsunami of retractions. (This could even affect those experiments that purport to show that we don’t have free will.)

Leave a Reply