Naturalism News

From The Edge (of yesterday’s science, connecting with funding), a new vid on ideas to retire from science

Spread the love

Here.

The result: Edge is pleased to present the world premiere of Dylan’s interesting and engaging four-minute impressionistic montage, featuring appearences by a number of Edgies: Jerry Coyne, Daniel C. Dennett, George Dyson, David Gelernter, Rebecca Newberger Goldstein, Alison Gopnik, Kevin Kelly, Alex Pentland, Irene Pepperberg, Steven Pinker, Lee Smolin, Paul Steinhardt, and Frank Wilczek.

JESSE DYLAN is a filmmaker and founder, Creative Director and CEO of Wondros, a production company based in LA. He has created media projects for a diverse group of organizations, including George Soros and the Open Society Foundations, Clinton Global Initiative, Council on Foreign Relations, MIT Media Lab, the Columbia Journalism School, and Harvard Medical School. Among his best known works is in the Emmy Award-winning “Yes We Can—Barack Obama Music Video”. Jesse Dylan’s Edge Bio Page.

Also a book, faux dramatically titled This Idea Must Die. It will be interesting to see which ideas really do die. Which get funded instead of retired. Which naturalist stuff gets re-galvanized (Frankenstein method). Which just collapses of its own unpersuasiveness. Taking bets here.

An earlier stab at the basic idea of the vid:

See also: January 2014: Events that made a difference to ID

Follow UD News at Twitter!

3 Replies to “From The Edge (of yesterday’s science, connecting with funding), a new vid on ideas to retire from science

  1. 1
    Robert Byers says:

    The list of edgies tells me the casting director should retire.
    The clowns thereof!!!
    steven pinker???
    Why do the bad guys stick around so long?
    its time for reformation in civilization and put things more right.
    Its time for more intelligent, interesting, excellent, morally good people to use science for God and man.
    The establishment is evil and unAmerican, uncanadian, and unfriendly to progressive mankind.

  2. 2
    Seversky says:

    Albert Einstein regarded his invention of the cosmological constant as the greatest blunder of his life. It denoted an expansive force that was necessary to counterbalance the attractive force of gravity and enable a static Universe which was believed to be the case at the time. Later observations, which revealed an expanding Universe, suggested that the concept was redundant and should be retired. Much more recent observations showed that not only is the Universe expanding but the expansion is accelerating the further away we look. Einstein’s greatest blunder has now been dusted off, brought out of retirement and put back into service.

    It’s quite obvious that the one scientific idea you’d like to see retired is evolution, although the animus behind the campaign has little to do with science. Perhaps the lesson to be learned from the story of the cosmological constant is that we should retire the idea that there are any ideas that should be retired, on the grounds that we have no way of knowing when they might come in useful again.

  3. 3
    bornagain77 says:

    Actually Einstein’s introduction of his constant was to reflect a static universe that has always existed, just so to satisfy his a-priori materialistic belief that the universe has always existed. That was what he considered his ‘greatest blunder’. The new cosmological constant, born from empirical evidence and not from a-priori philosophical belief, is in fact the most finely tuned constant of the universe (1 in 10^120) and, besides being consistent with the fact that space-time matter-energy were created 14 billion years ago, is also a powerful argument for design. The ‘new’ cosmological constant certainly does not help the evolutionist in his desire to prove evolution is not a pseudo-science.

    (Commenting on the 1 in 10^120 fine tuning of the expansion of the universe), “Hugh Ross states an analogy that does not even come close to describing the precarious nature of this cosmic balance [between too fast and too slow] would be a billion pencils all simultaneously positioned upright on their sharpened points on a smooth glass surface with no vertical supports.”
    Eric Metaxas – Miracles – page 49

    In fact the monumental ‘blunders’ associated with the materialistic philosophy are numerous:

    For a quick overview, here are a few:

    1. Naturalism/Materialism predicted time-space energy-matter always existed. Whereas Theism predicted time-space energy-matter were created. Big Bang cosmology now strongly indicates that time-space energy-matter had a sudden creation event approximately 14 billion years ago.

    2. Naturalism/Materialism predicted that the universe is a self sustaining system that is not dependent on anything else for its continued existence. Theism predicted that God upholds this universe in its continued existence. Breakthroughs in quantum mechanics reveal that this universe is dependent on a ‘non-local’, beyond space and time, cause for its continued existence.

    3. Naturalism/Materialism predicted that consciousness is a ‘emergent property’ of material reality and thus should have no particularly special position within material reality. Theism predicts consciousness precedes material reality and therefore, on that presupposition, consciousness should have a ‘special’ position within material reality. Quantum Mechanics reveals that consciousness has a special, even a central, position within material reality. –

    4. Naturalism/Materialism predicted the rate at which time passed was constant everywhere in the universe. Theism predicted God is eternal and is outside of time. – Special Relativity has shown that time, as we understand it, is relative and comes to a complete stop at the speed of light. (Psalm 90:4 – 2 Timothy 1:9) –

    5. Naturalism/Materialism predicted the universe did not have life in mind and that life was ultimately an accident of time and chance. Theism predicted this universe was purposely created by God with man in mind. Scientists find the universe is exquisitely fine-tuned for carbon-based life to exist in this universe. Moreover it is found, when scrutinizing the details of physics and chemistry, that not only is the universe fine-tuned for carbon based life, but is specifically fine-tuned for life like human life (R. Collins, M. Denton).-

    6. Naturalism/Materialism predicted complex life in this universe should be fairly common. Theism predicted the earth is extremely unique in this universe. Statistical analysis of the hundreds of required parameters which enable complex organic life to be possible on earth gives strong indication the earth is extremely unique in this universe (Gonzalez). –

    7. Naturalism/Materialism predicted it took a very long time for life to develop on earth. Theism predicted life to appear abruptly on earth after water appeared on earth (Genesis 1:10-11). Geo-chemical evidence from the oldest sedimentary rocks ever found on earth indicates that complex photo-synthetic life has existed on earth as long as water has been on the face of earth. –

    8. Naturalism/Materialism predicted the first life to be relatively simple. Theism predicted that God is the source for all life on earth. The simplest life ever found on Earth is far more complex than any machine man has made through concerted effort. (Michael Denton PhD) –

    9. Naturalism/Materialism predicted the gradual unfolding of life would (someday) be self-evident in the fossil record. Theism predicted complex and diverse animal life to appear abruptly in the seas in God’s fifth day of creation. The Cambrian Explosion shows a sudden appearance of many different and completely unique fossils within a very short “geologic resolution time” in the Cambrian seas. –

    10. Naturalism/Materialism predicted there should be numerous transitional fossils found in the fossil record, Theism predicted sudden appearance and rapid diversity within different kinds found in the fossil record. Fossils are consistently characterized by sudden appearance of a group/kind in the fossil record(disparity), then rapid diversity within that group/kind, and then long term stability and even deterioration of variety within the overall group/kind, and within the specific species of the kind, over long periods of time. Of the few dozen or so fossils claimed as transitional, not one is uncontested as a true example of transition between major animal forms out of millions of collected fossils. –

    11. Naturalism/Materialism predicted animal speciation should happen on a somewhat constant basis on earth. Theism predicted man was the last species created on earth – Man (our genus ‘modern homo’ as distinct from the highly controversial ‘early homo’) is the last generally accepted major fossil form to have suddenly appeared in the fossil record. (Tattersall; Luskin)–

    12. Naturalism/Materialism predicted much of the DNA code was junk. Theism predicted we are fearfully and wonderfully made – ENCODE research into the DNA has revealed a “biological jungle deeper, denser, and more difficult to penetrate than anyone imagined.”. –

    13. Naturalism/Materialism predicted a extremely beneficial and flexible mutation rate for DNA which was ultimately responsible for all the diversity and complexity of life we see on earth. Theism predicted only God created life on earth – The mutation rate to DNA is overwhelmingly detrimental. Detrimental to such a point that it is seriously questioned whether there are any truly beneficial, information building, mutations whatsoever. (M. Behe; JC Sanford) –

    14. Naturalism/Materialism predicted morality is subjective and illusory. Theism predicted morality is objective and real. Morality is found to be deeply embedded in the genetic responses of humans. As well, morality is found to be deeply embedded in the structure of the universe. Embedded to the point of eliciting physiological responses in humans before humans become aware of the morally troubling situation and even prior to the event even happening.

    15. Naturalism/Materialism predicted that we are merely our material bodies with no transcendent component to our being, and that we die when our material bodies die. Theism predicted that we have minds/souls that are transcendent of our bodies that live past the death of our material bodies. Transcendent, and ‘conserved’, (cannot be created or destroyed), ‘non-local’, (beyond space-time matter-energy), quantum entanglement/information, which is not reducible to matter-energy space-time, is now found in our material bodies on a massive scale.

    Thus if anything should be permanently retired from science it is the idea that materialism is true!

Leave a Reply