Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Vote for Your Favorite Logo!

Jonathan Bartlett
February 22, 2016
Naturalism, News
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

The Alternatives to Methodological Naturalism conference’s logo contest just finished taking submissions. Vote for your favorite design!

I am curious what you all think of the logo submissions. So, before picking one, I thought I would get your feedback on the submissions. You can see all of the active submissions here. Please post below your favorite logo (indicate it by the entry number), and maybe a note about why you think it is best!

Comments
#75 I like #42 too, but the frog and leaf design, while cool, is a bit too loudly Met. Naturalism for me, which is the point - we want an alternative.Borne
February 22, 2016
February
02
Feb
22
22
2016
09:33 PM
9
09
33
PM
PDT
This contest is not for people who speak English, is it? On a design level, I have to agree with others that #42 should take the prize, but I would enlarge the picture of the frog-leaf and delete all the writing.TimT
February 22, 2016
February
02
Feb
22
22
2016
07:23 PM
7
07
23
PM
PDT
Well, I know what meth. nat. is, but I'm not sure what the "alternatives" are. So I looked at the designs with a simple question. Which one tells me what "alt to meth nat" means? Definitely 42, the frog cut out of the leaf. Represents what I like to call the Grand Blueprint, the single original design yielding subdesigns by subtraction. The other logos are either Escher (why?) or generic corporate.polistra
February 22, 2016
February
02
Feb
22
22
2016
05:42 PM
5
05
42
PM
PDT
I like #42 as well. But then I like frogs...anthropic
February 22, 2016
February
02
Feb
22
22
2016
10:43 AM
10
10
43
AM
PDT
John S: Do you mean #42? My favourite is #11.gpuccio
February 22, 2016
February
02
Feb
22
22
2016
08:46 AM
8
08
46
AM
PDT
#143 It is unique among the submissions with the frog and leaf. I don't know who the logo is designed for, who the target audience is, but for a regular dude (not a scientist) that's the one I would be most drawn to click on. The others look like geek logos, and combined with the name most 'normal' people will not have their interest stirred.John S
February 22, 2016
February
02
Feb
22
22
2016
07:36 AM
7
07
36
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply