Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Invitations to Hitler Connections

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

One of the worst things about one side making connections to Hitler is it invites return fire of the same kind. This should be filed under the category “People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones”.

How many of you knew that beloved evangelical Christian minister Jerry Falwell shared Adolf Hitler’s views about the importance of maintaining the purity of the white race?

I’m not saying “modern” evangelicals feel this way, any more than “modern” Darwinist are that way, but… as long as we’re dredging up the past of one side it’s only fair to dredge up the other’s too.

Addendum: No one seems to have picked up on the point that Falwell, as an evangelical Christian biblical literalist, did not believe in “Darwinism” yet he still shared his racial thinking with Hitler. Further proof that you don’t need Darwin to be a racist.

From The Nation “Agent of Intolerance”

Decades before the forces that now make up the Christian right declared their culture war, Falwell was a rabid segregationist who railed against the civil rights movement from the pulpit of the abandoned backwater bottling plant he converted into Thomas Road Baptist Church. This opening episode of Falwell’s life, studiously overlooked by his friends, naïvely unacknowledged by many of his chroniclers, and puzzlingly and glaringly omitted in the obituaries of the Washington Post and New York Times, is essential to understanding his historical significance in galvanizing the Christian right. Indeed, it was race–not abortion or the attendant suite of so-called “values” issues–that propelled Falwell and his evangelical allies into political activism.

As with his positions on abortion and homosexuality, the basso profondo preacher’s own words on race stand as vivid documents of his legacy. Falwell launched on the warpath against civil rights four years after the Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision to desegregate public schools with a sermon titled “Segregation or Integration: Which?”

“If Chief Justice Warren and his associates had known God’s word and had desired to do the Lord’s will, I am quite confident that the 1954 decision would never have been made,” Falwell boomed from above his congregation in Lynchburg. “The facilities should be separate. When God has drawn a line of distinction, we should not attempt to cross that line.”

Falwell’s jeremiad continued: “The true Negro does not want integration…. He realizes his potential is far better among his own race.” Falwell went on to announce that integration “will destroy our race eventually. In one northern city,” he warned, “a pastor friend of mine tells me that a couple of opposite race live next door to his church as man and wife.”

As pressure from the civil rights movement built during the early 1960s, and President Lyndon Johnson introduced sweeping civil rights legislation, Falwell grew increasingly conspiratorial. He enlisted with J. Edgar Hoover to distribute FBI manufactured propaganda against the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and publicly denounced the 1964 Civil Rights Act as “civil wrongs.”

Comments
There is no dredging on one side or the other. Darwins theory was not just about some experimental biology in the present, it makes claims about the unobservable past and the source of all 'humanity'. As a product of time and physics there is no good or evil period. In this worldview there is no problem with hitler and there's no problem with Falwell ...butifnot
April 22, 2008
April
04
Apr
22
22
2008
06:50 AM
6
06
50
AM
PDT
Dave, I don't get the connection at all. I'm Catholic. I don't have any interest in making Jerry Falwell out to be a hero; but this article is a hatchet job written on the occasion of Falwell's death. It's written with a poisoned pen. And, in places, it contradicts itself. It's clear that Falwell had racist views. It's not clear how much those views changed as society changed and as he aged---and it's abundantly clear that if those views changed for the better the author had no intention at all of informing us of them. But what in the world does this have to do with Darwinism and Hitler? When I saw "Expelled" and heard the quotes from the Fuhrer, I finally understood the Holocaust---it was Darwinist/eugenecist thinking, plain and simple. And this was right from the 'horse's mouth'. So how does that legitimate link between Hitler and Darwinism have anything to do with ID being linked in any way with Jerry Falwell? Is ID the result of a sermon that Falwell gave? Of course not. So who cares what Falwell believed and what he preached? Is he considered one of the evil men of the 20th century? I think not. If you are posting this for the sake of 'balance', I'm at a loss as to why. I really think you should consider deleting it.PaV
April 22, 2008
April
04
Apr
22
22
2008
06:50 AM
6
06
50
AM
PDT
Sometime ago I made the point that the Nazi/Darwin connection should be used with care lest the Old Testament issues of genocide and the "chosen race" be brought up. See: High School Biology Teacher Fired, Comment 20. That said, let's see where Stein's movie goes. At least empirically speaking, from public relations standpoint it seems effective. But I would still exercise caution mingling ID with the Nazi/Darwin connection and Creationism. In Stein's defense, he used Provine's "no morality" speech as a lead in to describing a society governed by no morality except the morality of selection. That society was the Nazis. Whether Darwin's writings were explicitly at the heart of Nazisism, or whether it was arrived at independently, at least aspects of Nazisism paralleled parts of Darwin's ideas. Strictly speaking there were Nazi's that embraced Eugenics but were rather vague about common descent (Himmler hated the idea the Germans descended from apes).... Darwin himself had a deformed daughter. I suppose he could not bring himself to advocate Eugenics lest he sacrifice his own. One can also speculate that Darwin wished Eugenics were practiced, and thus he would not have supposedly been in the predicament of having a deforemed child....who knows..... Rather than the Darwin/Hitler connection, I prefer pointing out that Thornhill and Palmer argue that "Rape is as natural as a giraffe's neck" due to natural selection. Or David Buss who says the propensity for murder is due to natural selection. It highlights Provine's thesis that without God there is no morality. Whether Provine, Buss, Thorhill, or Palmer accurately reprsent Darwin is another story. As Berlinski said, the whole thing is one incoherent mess. It's pointless to try to argue what Darwin really meant since, imho, he held many contradictory views simultaneously....scordova
April 22, 2008
April
04
Apr
22
22
2008
05:59 AM
5
05
59
AM
PDT
1 2 3 4

Leave a Reply