macroevolution – Uncommon Descent

The Palmers’ continuing series at YouTube: Micro evolution vs Macro Evolution, Part 2

From introduction: [I]n Part 2 we look at the textbook examples of microevolution in light of gene sequencing. In every example of microevolution used to support Darwinism, mutations only degraded existing genes. No new genes were created. But without new genes, Darwinism is limited to microevolution.

Evolution Intelligent Design

At Evolution News: What do biologists really know about macroevolution?

Do they really know about evolution, or is their exercise a detailed construction of a house of cards?

ET Yes, Viola Lee. I read your asinine trope and I responded to it. You have serious honesty issues and should... – Is Darwinism an "Empty Theory"?
jerry Darwin “the father of genetics” ??? Not even the Marx brothers could come up with a joke like that. Except... – BioLogos hopes to calm the fears...
Belfast Darwin and genetics are as mismatched as a billiard ball and a fountain pen; not even the fervid Darwinist Wikipedia... – BioLogos hopes to calm the fears...
Viola Lee Posts 29 is the kind of rationalization and story-telling that drove me away from religious belief. I'm with WJM on... – Materialists Know What They Say is...
EDTA They describe what they are doing with words like "design", "assembled", and "synthesized. That says it all. – Researchers propose trying different recipes for...
bornagain77 Zweston at 6 thanks for the link. Robert Carter, and especially John Sanford, are both wrecking balls when it comes... – BioLogos hopes to calm the fears...
jerry Your re-write is hopelessly misinformed. No. It's right on. Nobody would use the rewrite where I just changed the word... – BioLogos hopes to calm the fears...
Belfast @Gerry. @3, Your re-write is hopelessly misinformed. Darwin knew from nothing about genetics. In fact, genetics basically tells us what... – BioLogos hopes to calm the fears...
Lieutenant Commander Data JVL Mutations are mistakes, errors or accidents. JVL Mutations aren’t guided. Randomness doesn't make mistakes, errors, accidents. Mistakes ,errors ,accidents... – Is Darwinism an "Empty Theory"?
Belfast The articles, (there are 2) are very useful as a conspectus of the poverty stricken nature of the hypotheses of... – Researchers propose trying different recipes for...
martin_r BobRyan It is fascinating just how many people believe in something where there is no evidence to support it i... – BioLogos hopes to calm the fears...
ram He washed my sins away --Ram – Materialists Know What They Say is...
StephenB WJM: The OP is about saying something that is false while knowing it is false, wrt things that are clearly,... – Materialists Know What They Say is...
JVL ET: Wow. You can’t even follow along. Saying that mutations are random with respect to fitness does NOT have any... – Is Darwinism an "Empty Theory"?
zweston Define evil, WJM. I'm not avoiding anything. You measure evil by what you think is evil, just like the pedophile... – Materialists Know What They Say is...
Viola Lee ET, did you read 130? – Is Darwinism an "Empty Theory"?
ET Dogs? Your position can't even account for the existence of dogs! – Materialists Know What They Say is...
ET Viola Lee: And I’m fairly sure that ET has written that everything is designed in discussions with me in the... – Is Darwinism an "Empty Theory"?
ET JVL: Of course they are still accidents, errors or mistakes! Wow. You can't even follow along. Saying that mutations are... – Is Darwinism an "Empty Theory"?
chuckdarwin Zweston @ 23 I'm guessing that universalism (or annihilationism) would be anathema to most folks that follow this blog. Their... – Materialists Know What They Say is...
William J Murray Zweston @23: Are you avoiding answering the question? Or, is this your way of refusing to admit that a clear,... – Materialists Know What They Say is...