Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

BREAKING/DEVELOPING: Russia invades Ukraine

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email
Wikipedia initial map of the invasion, especially note a reported incursion from western Belarus and the main weight of reported bombings and incursions in the eastern trans-Dnieper region, the DonBass

BBC announces:

Russian forces have launched a military assault on neighbouring Ukraine, crossing its borders and bombing military targets near big cities.

A residential building in Chuguev was destroyed after it was shelled.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that Moscow’s response will be “instant” if anyone tries to take on Russia.

Ukraine has urged the UN “to do everything possible” to stop what it says is a full-scale war.

We could title this, the geostrategic price of weakness, starting with the USA. Recall here, my 2016 framework:

Of course as this seems overnight the fog of war is very much in effect and we need to bear in mind that we are unlikely to have a full or reliable picture. DEVELOPING, UPDATES TO FOLLOW

U/D Feb 25, a map of the course of the invasion:

Wikipedia’s updated but provisional map c Feb 24, showing reported lines of thrust. Note, provisional

U/D Feb 27: Wiki Map Feb 26

Wiki map c Feb 26, showing lodgement areas, thrusts and move to decapitate by taking Kiev

U/D Feb 28, let’s insert the Feb 28 Wiki map to compare:

U/D Feb 27: HT Daily Mail, a map of detail fighting near Kiev:

HT, Daily Mail, on fighting near Kiev. Seizing an airport as an air head is a known standard modern tactic for the side with air superiority. Compare Bagram in Afghanistan and its abandonment just before the US fleeing from Afghanistan

U/D, Feb 27: Geostrategic considerations:

U/D Feb 28, Putin puts nuke forces to high alert, issues implied threats, even as he agrees to talks — vid:

U/D Mar 1: Overnight on the updated operational situation map at Wikipedia:

Update overnight Feb 28/Mar 1. We see a bridgehead across the Dnieper in the South coming from Crimea, with a column advancing NW. To the N, a cluster of breakouts on the E bank are beginning to fan out and another is joining with the enclave to the E. Other columns are pushing in from the N and E, and the siege of Kharkov and Kiev are also underway. Air strikes cluster on Kiev but are spread across the whole country.

U/D, March 3: The already taken zones are being consolidated and extended and columns are surging out. Most notably, from Crimea to the West, and the thrust to Kiev is being broadened.

U/D Mar 4: VDH analyses, pivoting on the Javelin anti-tank missile:

U/D March 5, map is revised on Mar 3rd:

Notice here fresh probes from White Russia, a thrust to the W along a major road net towards Poland, a swing back towards Kiev for a thrust that was apparently aiming to pinch off a chunk of Northern Ukraine continued columns from the NE and the continuation of the western breakout from Crimea. Kiev and Kharkov seem to be holding,

U/D2 Mar 5, a Daily Mail Map:

This Daily Mail map is more outline and differs in details but tells the same basic story.

U/D May 8, a screen shot from Russian TV with a marked up encirclement in the E:

Oh yes, apparently there is an enemies list:

  • All EU member States,
  • The USA
  • Australia
  • Albania
  • Andorra
  • Czech Republic
  • Great Britain (including Jersey, Anguilla, British Virgin Islands and Gibraltar)
  • Iceland
  • Canada
  • Liechtenstein
  • Micronesia
  • Monaco
  • New Zealand
  • Norway
  • Republic of Korea
  • San Marino
  • North Macedonia
  • Singapore
  • Taiwan
  • Ukraine
  • Montenegro
  • Switzerland
  • Japan

They left off a raft of UK OT’s there, including Cayman, Montserrat, Turks and Caicos Islands, Bermuda, Isle of Man, Falklands, Pitcairn, St Helena, South Georgia etc. I guess they list where their offshore accounts are and got frozen?

U/D March 9, Putin in Southern Africa as a trainer for guerilla leaders, 1973:

This is my comment on an iHarare piece brought to my attention by people inclined to cheer on anything that is suggested as aiding liberation from Western Imperialism. An objection was made in the combox, that Putin’s age would be 20-ish and his official life story puts him in law school at relevant times. I noted that he was KGB and we can expect contradictory narratives, where the window is that in which military service is likely. The association with two African Presidents of the left is noteworthy. I suggest, assume it is not in fact Putin, that would only lead to, Russians were engaged in geostrategic pushes in guise of liberation movements, some of which have proved disastrous for ordinary people in certain African countries. The geostrategic point remains.

U/D: Wiki map, March 6, showing armoured thrusts far beyond the zones identified in a Russian proposal for ceasefire terms. Notice, these are by and large conservative relative to what has been shown on Russian TV, scroll up:

U/D, Mar 15 – 20: Russian forces consolidate while keeping Kiev under pressure:

The consolidation ratchets up pressure on Ukraine, the attacks on the capital can lead to decision, negotiations seem stalled over Russia’s demand for neutrality, which has already been seen as invitation to invasion. Sanctions have been put in place but are seldom decisive.

Comments
JVL/27
Seversky: Who cares what Putin’s excuse is? It’s all a pretext for his expansionism, his apparent desire to rebuild something like the old Soviet Union. In his book Prisoners of Geography (highly recommended), Tim Marshall does a good job of explaining some of what drives Russia’s expansionism.
That's a very nice review. To add to the picture, I was listening to an NPR investigation into Putin's ascent to the Russian Presidency. It dates to when Putin first became Prime Minister of Russia. This was a few years after the first Chechen war which Chechnya won. It ended with a peace treaty in which Chechnya got pretty much everything they wanted. A few years later there was a series of four terrorist bombings which brought down apartment blocks, killed around 300 people and not unnaturally created a public panic. Putin immediately blamed Chechen terrorists and used it as a pretext for the second war against Chechnya which greatly boosted his public popularity. The problem with this thesis was that the Chechens had no reason to start a bombing campaign as they had got everything they wanted from the original peace treaty. In addition, investigations into the bombings identified the explosive used as a high-grade military explosive which was produced in only one highly-secure facility controlled by the FSB. Then witnesses saw a fifth bomb being planted in an apartment block and alerted the police. Again this was found to be this military explosive but more importantly, the people who planted it were observed, traced and finally arrested. They turned out to be FSB operatives. If you add to this the various assassinations of opponents and critics of Putin and we have a profile of a man who is a clever and utterly ruthless political thug with a lot of blood on his hands. If you deal with him on any other basis you are asking for trouble. That is why I believe we should be taking much more aggressive measures against him as that is all he will respect. We don't have a pretext for NATO military intervention in Ukraine but that doesn't prevent the deployment of carrier battle groups to within range of Russian naval assets, a much large number of troops to border regions around Ukraine and much more military assistance to the country. I realize that plays into Putin's narrative about the threat from NATO but so what? We know he lies through his teeth whenever it suits him - much like Trump - so who cares? We need to take the initiative and at least throw a scare into him and the people around. The UK has banned Aeroflot from flying into its airspace (and the Russians have retaliated in kind of course) so why is it still allowed to fly into the US? Why not break off diplomatic relations, withdraw all US diplomatic missions on Russian soil and expel all Russian missions from the US? Given that Ukrainians are now fighting and dying to defend their country I don't think a certain amount of economic and political discomfort is to much to ask in order to support them. As for his threat of nuclear war that is just so much BS. If we are correct in our assessment that Putin's ambition is to rebuild Russia to the superpower status of the old Soviet Union then he is not going to throw all that away in an all-out nuclear exchange which would destroy Russia just surely as it would other participants. He is very clever not stupid. Of course, if Trump were in power this would never have happened. He would have sold Ukraine down the river for a promise of "genius" Putin's permission to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.Seversky
February 26, 2022
February
02
Feb
26
26
2022
07:07 PM
7
07
07
PM
PDT
Let us hope.Viola Lee
February 26, 2022
February
02
Feb
26
26
2022
04:22 PM
4
04
22
PM
PDT
I am being told by my friend who lives in the Ukraine that according to Estonian intelligence Putin has left Moscow for his bunker in the Urals and that there is a real danger now that something really bad could happen to Putin. Vividvividbleau
February 26, 2022
February
02
Feb
26
26
2022
02:19 PM
2
02
19
PM
PDT
An interesting analysis of Europe’s energy supply/demand and the dependence of Germany in particular on outside energy sources. https://tomluongo.me/2022/02/25/eu-sanctions-suicide-by-cop/ I don’t pretend to understand half of it. The real reasons for everything is some how hidden. The world today is very different. Countries theoretically at war with each other are trading with each other. For example, Russian gas is still flowing through Ukraine to Europe. US is still importing Russian oil.jerry
February 26, 2022
February
02
Feb
26
26
2022
01:20 PM
1
01
20
PM
PDT
Silver Asiatic: It’s not a good sign when the Russian people and even the soldiers don’t support the war. I’d guess that the average people don’t see the reasoning or need for it and probably they want Westernization just as much as the Ukrainians do. Exactly so. Decades ago no one in repressive regimes knew they could dissent and be heard. Everything's different now. Now all those with a smart phone and internet access can see what they don't have but the rest of us do have.JVL
February 26, 2022
February
02
Feb
26
26
2022
01:05 PM
1
01
05
PM
PDT
JVL
Whatever happens this whole excursion is going to be bad for Russia. If he wins the economic sanctions and the costs of keeping Ukraine under military occupation will start to bite.
It's not a good sign when the Russian people and even the soldiers don't support the war. I'd guess that the average people don't see the reasoning or need for it and probably they want Westernization just as much as the Ukrainians do.
distraught mothers say their sons were tricked into joining Putin's army and told they were going to Ukraine for practice drills https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10549055/Russian-mothers-say-sons-tricked-joining-Putins-army.html
Silver Asiatic
February 26, 2022
February
02
Feb
26
26
2022
08:55 AM
8
08
55
AM
PDT
A short recent history of Ukraine https://www.creators.com/read/michael-barone/02/22/ukraines-fate-is-rooted-in-a-tragic-historyjerry
February 26, 2022
February
02
Feb
26
26
2022
07:50 AM
7
07
50
AM
PDT
Silver Asiatic: Trump was also a businessman and he would pride himself in being able to work a deal of some kind with anybody – friend or foe. He believes the common denominator is money and making a profit. I think Putin would agree with it. He doesn’t seem to be totally ideologically driven. I have heard some estimates or guesses that Putin has accumulated quite a substantial pile of personal wealth. Which is why some of the economic sanctions being levelled by many countries are directed at him and some of his cronies personally. I have also heard supposition, I think it might be true, that Putin is now at his peak. Whatever happens this whole excursion is going to be bad for Russia. If he wins the economic sanctions and the costs of keeping Ukraine under military occupation will start to bite. If he looses then he looks stupid and weak and he will have wasted loads of money and Russian soldiers lives. I don't think the Russian oligarchs are going to put up with too much financial disruption even if they have got a large stash they can live off of for a time. They won't be able to go anywhere or do anything and I doubt they'd be happy just hanging around Moscow.JVL
February 26, 2022
February
02
Feb
26
26
2022
06:57 AM
6
06
57
AM
PDT
JVL
Now I think maybe the best way to deal with them is to puff up and look big and bad and nasty right away and then, later, back off a bit and agree to something less drastic. Because that’s the way they deal with things. That’s their playground style of dealing with international issues.
Yes, I think that's why Trump was respected enough to build some dialogue because he had that kind of demeanor. Reagan also gave off that impression at least. The Russian approach seems to favor that, as you say. I've had some good friends from Ukraine and they all have expressed their admiration for a leader who seems physically tough and manly in the classic sense of that. It's part of the culture. Trump was also a businessman and he would pride himself in being able to work a deal of some kind with anybody - friend or foe. He believes the common denominator is money and making a profit. I think Putin would agree with it. He doesn't seem to be totally ideologically driven.Silver Asiatic
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
02:58 PM
2
02
58
PM
PDT
JVL
as it seems that the idea of a theocratic state has become less popular.
It's popular enough in the Mideast. Saudi Arabia and Israel are two places that come to mind. So, at least those people find it a workable solution.Silver Asiatic
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
02:53 PM
2
02
53
PM
PDT
JVL “Remember: the Soviet Union got involved in Afghanistan and left well before the Americans got there. It was their Vietnam.” And I don’t think it will go well for them in the Ukraine, I think the Ukrainians will fiercely fight, I think their biting off more than they can chew. Vividvividbleau
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
01:29 PM
1
01
29
PM
PDT
Why does this feel like Army Group South on the East Front?kairosfocus
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
01:08 PM
1
01
08
PM
PDT
Kairosfocus: JVL, the problem with constitutional democracy is its inherent instability requiring cultural buttresses to stabilise it. We are busily undermining these and I have serious doubts the Russians are near where they should be Well, you are welcome to provide a viable alternative. Especially as it seems that the idea of a theocratic state has become less popular. Besides, whose to judge what is true when the theocratic underpinnings get re-evaluated?JVL
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
01:07 PM
1
01
07
PM
PDT
JVL, the problem with constitutional democracy is its inherent instability requiring cultural buttresses to stabilise it. We are busily undermining these and I have serious doubts the Russians are near where they should be. The mix, as my 2016 chart outlines, is volatile. KFkairosfocus
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
01:00 PM
1
01
00
PM
PDT
Sc, pardon but more is showing than you would be advised. KFkairosfocus
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
12:56 PM
12
12
56
PM
PDT
Silver Asiatic: It makes me wonder. Trump seemed to be building some trust with Putin – willing to negotiate. It really made me think that he could have defused some of that paranoia. Why not? What Russia is looking for (if you’re scenario is correct) is reasonable — trying to build some security. They watched America invade Afghanistan (and Iraq and Syria), so there’s a precedent against fear of terrorism. Remember: the Soviet Union got involved in Afghanistan and left well before the Americans got there. It was their Vietnam. Putin is an old ex-KGB fellow. He lives on paranoia. It's what his power base is based on. He trusts no one. He will play a foreign leader if he thinks they will deflect some attention from his basic strategies. I'm not a Trump fan but I bet he was given a huge blast of attention and seeming agreement because there was absolutely no intention to adhere to any agreement that happened. I'm not going to remember this entirely correctly but when Ronald Reagan became US President someone in the Soviet Union said: we understand him, we can negotiate with him. At the time (I was young and naive) I thought Reagan was volatile and dangerous but the Russians got him. Now I think maybe the best way to deal with them is to puff up and look big and bad and nasty right away and then, later, back off a bit and agree to something less drastic. Because that's the way they deal with things. That's their playground style of dealing with international issues.JVL
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
11:28 AM
11
11
28
AM
PDT
Kairosfocus:JVL, perhaps, the Russians need to ask themselves why Poland, Hungary, Rumania and even former states within the USSR (Baltic States) bolted from Warsaw Pact for NATO. Then, that might give them a basis for evaluating the tendency to slide into lawless oligarchy, the challenge of lawfulness and how — for all its flaws and problems — constitutional democracy is now a centuries old challenge to oligarchy. Those who in our own states seem enamoured of return to absolute monarchy [e.g. IslamIST radicals] or to ideological oligarchy through jacobinism, should similarly pause. Hey, you don't need to convince me of the benefits of constitutional democracy, I'm a big fan. It works, for the benefit of the greatest number of people. But that doesn't sit well with Putin's self-selected job title.JVL
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
11:11 AM
11
11
11
AM
PDT
KF: Churchill was a deeply flawed and widely despised man at that time, but unfortunately he was right.
So, Trump is half of what Churchill was.Scamp
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
10:59 AM
10
10
59
AM
PDT
An updated invasion map is in the OP.kairosfocus
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
10:56 AM
10
10
56
AM
PDT
Kairosfocus It seems they expect Kiev to fall within four days. Intent is to install a puppet government. Excuse is, the president — a Jew — is a Nazi.
I guess Putin learns from WEF how to install a puppet government except Putin make it live on Tv by brute force while the others by "peaceful" infiltrations . We don't know which method is more bloody but certainly we know who looks like a criminal and who pose as a humanist.Lieutenant Commander Data
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
10:46 AM
10
10
46
AM
PDT
JVL, perhaps, the Russians need to ask themselves why Poland, Hungary, Rumania and even former states within the USSR (Baltic States) bolted from Warsaw Pact for NATO. Then, that might give them a basis for evaluating the tendency to slide into lawless oligarchy, the challenge of lawfulness and how -- for all its flaws and problems -- constitutional democracy is now a centuries old challenge to oligarchy. Those who in our own states seem enamoured of return to absolute monarchy [e.g. IslamIST radicals] or to ideological oligarchy through jacobinism, should similarly pause. KFkairosfocus
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
10:44 AM
10
10
44
AM
PDT
Cyber attack on Russia
Kremlin And Other Russian Government Sites Down
https://www.iflscience.com/editors-blog/breaking-kremlin-and-other-russian-government-sites-down/ From 3 1/2 years ago
U.S. Becomes Net Exporter of Oil, Fuels for First Time in Decades
https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-becomes-net-exporter-of-oil-fuels-for-first-time-in-decades-1544128404?st=txzk54ggj74ic9q&reflink=desktopwebshare_twitter Now we are beholden to Russia for our oil.jerry
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
08:55 AM
8
08
55
AM
PDT
JVL 27 Good overview.
They are constantly worried about strong nations or groups of nations, like NATO, on their borders. Having buffer states under your control is a security issue for a nation that thinks everyone is out to get them.
It makes me wonder. Trump seemed to be building some trust with Putin - willing to negotiate. It really made me think that he could have defused some of that paranoia. Why not? What Russia is looking for (if you're scenario is correct) is reasonable -- trying to build some security. They watched America invade Afghanistan (and Iraq and Syria), so there's a precedent against fear of terrorism.Silver Asiatic
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
08:25 AM
8
08
25
AM
PDT
One man’s thoughts on Russia. McMaster says Russia is not getting greater, the West is deteriorating. And that is their goal. https://twitter.com/HooverInst/status/1497018508604968962?cxt=HBwWhMCsud2ZvcYpAAAA&cn=ZmxleGlibGVfcmVjcw%3D%3D&refsrc=email Aside: we tend to equate material progress with a better world. In many ways that is true, but in many ways it’s not as we are witnessing.jerry
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
08:08 AM
8
08
08
AM
PDT
Seversky: Who cares what Putin’s excuse is? It’s all a pretext for his expansionism, his apparent desire to rebuild something like the old Soviet Union. In his book Prisoners of Geography (highly recommended), Tim Marshall does a good job of explaining some of what drives Russia's expansionism. Russia does not have a good ocean-going port; important these days for movement of goods and in the past for creating a strong naval presence. St Petersburg is okay but to leave you have to go out of a channel controlled by Estonia and Finland. Vladivostock is frozen over for months and months and is in an area controlled by Japan. Russia 'took back' Crimea (given to Ukraine in 1954 by Khrushchev) but even Sevastopol (on the Black Sea) is surrounded by non-Russian allies AND to get out you have to go through the Bosporus and, eventually the Straits of Gibraltar. It's terribly easy to stop Russia from having any kind of naval power by closing off those three ports. By the way, the only way to get to Crimea via land vehicles without going through the Ukraine is over some lengthy bridges, east to take out if need be. Russia was invaded by Napoleon, the Germans (twice) and they had to fight the British in Crimea and the Japanese all in the last 200 years or so. They are constantly worried about strong nations or groups of nations, like NATO, on their borders. Having buffer states under your control is a security issue for a nation that thinks everyone is out to get them. Russia does produce a lot of gas and oil (and wheat) which it sells to other nations who are frequently trying to reduce their dependancy on Russia. Russia is terrified of EU and NATO missiles being stationed in countries bordering them. Quite reasonable when you consider what the Americans thought of Cuba having missiles in 1962. Russia thinks the world has lied to it by allowing a great expansion of NATO into areas that Russia thinks they were promised NATO would NOT expand into including many of the former Warsaw Pact countries. I am, in no way, apologising for Russia's behaviour; it runs counter to just about everything we need to keep this world from spiralling down into wide-scale warfare. But if you want to understand what they are scared of consider their history.JVL
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
07:06 AM
7
07
06
AM
PDT
Jerry, I note two moves, blocking a gas pipeline from Israel and giving a green light for one from Russia, the latter reversing an objection. KFkairosfocus
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
05:42 AM
5
05
42
AM
PDT
What will control their actions is to fundamentally undermine their economy. The way you do that is for us to produce so much gas and oil that we are able to replace Russia as a force in this world for economic energy production,” says former Senator Judd Gregg on #Russia
https://twitter.com/SquawkCNBC/status/1497185494999965697 The greens got us into this. Will the opposite of greens gets us out? It’s seems so.jerry
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
05:28 AM
5
05
28
AM
PDT
Exchanges at the UN (where Russia chairs Security Council currently): https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/02/24/ukraine-tells-russia-to-go-straight-to-hell-at-russia-led-u-n-meeting-on-russian-invasion-of-ukraine/ >>Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia used his status as president to condemn Ukraine for causing its own invasion, blaming the Zelensky administration, which took office in 2019, for the Maidan pro-democracy protests in 2014 that led to the resignation of Putin proxy Viktor Yanukovych. “The tragedy in Ukraine started indeed after the illegal coup in Maidan in 2014 when, rather than dialogue with the Russian-speaking citizens of Ukraine, the new authorities brandished guns and airplanes at them,” Nebenzia claimed. In reality, Yanukovych’s security forces killed over 100 mostly peaceful protesters who had flooded the heart of Kyiv urging their government to move away from Russian influence and embrace Europe. The Maidan protests led to the election of Petro Poroshenko, the president Zelensky defeated in the 2019 vote. Nebenzia also claimed that “occupation of Ukraine is not in our plan,” a remark that outraged Ukrainian Ambassador to the United Nations Sergiy Kyslytsya. Kyslytsya told the assembly that his prepared statement was “useless” because there was no longer any time to prevent full-scale war. “The Russian president declared a war. Should I play the video of your president? You declared a war. It’s responsibility of this body to stop the war,” Kyslytsya asserted. The Ukrainian ambassador urged Russia to give up the presidency of the Security Council. “The Russian Federation ought to relinquish responsibilities of the Security Council, pass on responsibilities to a legitimate member of the Security Council,” Kyslytsya recommended, a member that is [respectful] of the charter, and I ask the members of the Security Council to convene an emergency meeting immediately and consider all necessary decisions to stop the war because its too late my dear colleagues to speak about de-escalation.” Kyslytsya received the final remark at the meeting, which he used to condemn Nebenzia and the Russian government to Hell. “There is no purgatory for war criminals, they go straight to Hell,” Kyslytsya said.>> Apparently, no action by the Council and Russia of course holds a veto. They will also recall that their boycott in 1950 opened up opportunity for the vote for armed response to the North Korean invasion of the South backed by Stalin. KFkairosfocus
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
04:05 AM
4
04
05
AM
PDT
F/N, do we need reminding that Ukraine dismantled nukes inherited from the USSR on a covenant of mutual guarantee of its security? 1 Maccabees, for cause, notes that the nations always breach their treaties. KFkairosfocus
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
03:57 AM
3
03
57
AM
PDT
Sev, Putin sees himself as restoring what was needlessly lost. As for Mr Biden, let me just reserve comment on his motives, behaviour, character and legitimacy. The dirty power games in the US since 2016 amounting to low kinetic 4th gen civil war complete with red guards and lawfare pushes, now peeking out through the window of the Durham indictment, have sobering -- and predicted -- geostrategic consequences. KFkairosfocus
February 25, 2022
February
02
Feb
25
25
2022
03:52 AM
3
03
52
AM
PDT
1 6 7 8 9

Leave a Reply