BREAKING: President Trump, Mrs Trump & Ms Hicks are Positive for CV-19

_{kairosfocus
October 2, 2020

News Highlights

1}_{Categories
News Highlights}

Share: Facebook; Twitter/X; LinkedIn; Flipboard; Print; Email

Tweets:

Tonight, @ FLOTUS and I tested positive for COVID-19. We will begin our quarantine and recovery process immediately. We will get through this TOGETHER!
— Donald J. Trump (@ realDonaldTrump) October 2, 2020

Hope Hicks, who has been working so hard without even taking a small break, has just tested positive for Covid 19. Terrible! The First Lady and I are waiting for our test results. In the meantime, we will begin our quarantine process!
— Donald J. Trump (@ realDonaldTrump) October 2, 2020

When you thought an extraordinarily chaotic year could not pull out another twist. Well, here it is. END

PS: As broad context

PPS: For reference on HCQ

Also:

PPPS: A sampler from a former CEO, Twitter (cf discussion at Forbes [also here]) commented on by Michelle Malkin, a few days ago:

See, now, that this is NOT a normal silly season cycle?

PPPPS: A summary on the U/L trajectory of CV19:

Comments

From a Wall Street Journal article last week
Youth Pay a High Price for Covid Protection We find that the benefits of protection are disproportionately higher for older people. Consider two extremes: the 18-year-old and the 85-year-old. If the 18-year-old dies, he loses 61.2 years of expected life. That’s a lot. But the probability of the 18-year-old dying, if infected, is tiny, about 0.004%. So the expected years of life lost are only 0.004% times 35% times 61.2 years, which is 0.0009 year. That’s only 7.5 hours. Everything this younger person has been through over the past year was to prevent, on average, the loss of 7.5 hours of his life. But the young person will pay a penalty for all this estimated as a loss of $100k over a lifetime for a gain of 7.5 hours of life. Now consider the 85-year-old. If he dies, he will lose 6.4 years of expected life. The probability of dying, if infected, is much higher for him, about 8%. So the expected years of life lost are 8% times 35% times 6.4 years, which is 0.179 year—65 days. The benefits of protection, measured in life expectancy, are 210 times as high for the older person. The elderly person will lose almost nothing since their working days are over. So restricting them has little economic cost.
May be behind a pay wall https://www.wsj.com/articles/youth-pay-a-high-price-for-covid-protection-11620078943 I know that every life is precious but there is a risk to being alive and spending on some things have negative consequence elsewhere. Which are rarely taken into account.jerry_{May 10, 2021
May
05
May
10
10
2021
01:35 PM
1
01
35
PM
PDT}

Here is a recent video by Dr. Peter McCullough who has become a nationally recognized expert on C19 treatment but a pariah to many of the elites. https://rumble.com/vgohj7-peter-mccullough-talks-treatment-research-vax-stats-and-if-the-medical-comm.html Here is a site that shows the places one can get monoclonal antibody therapeutics if one gets C19. https://protect-public.hhs.gov/pages/therapeutics-distribution#distribution-locations Obviously getting less and less of a need as vaccinations increase but still some are getting C19.jerry_{May 9, 2021
May
05
May
9
09
2021
02:48 PM
2
02
48
PM
PDT}

Too funny. The losers at the swamp are too stupid to understand science so one of them tries to harpoon Jerry for posting support for HCQ. How brainless are evos, anyway?ET_{May 9, 2021
May
05
May
9
09
2021
06:56 AM
6
06
56
AM
PDT}

How C19 came to be. It emerged from Bat Cave.
1/ I gotta new theory about the origins of the virus and it brings it all together! The bats were mad at the Bat Lady, see. Because she kept bugging them in their caves. So they did a little light reading on furin cleavage and ACE-2 receptors and optimized spike proteins... And they got themselves some equipment, and they made a real good virus. Then they picked one heroic bat to stow a fast train to Wuhan and gave him special instructions not to infect anyone until he got close to the Bat Lady's lab... And the superbat did it! Then he came back from Wuhan. But he walked, so he wouldn't leave batprints in the air. He is now King of the Bats and sits atop a guano throne. All to make sure the Bat Lady looked bad. This theory is at least as plausible as zoonotic transmission. Since I just read @NewYorker story on UFOs, Imma throw that out as a possibility too. De troot is out there. And by out there, I mean in a very well-guarded CCP file in Beijing.
From Alex Berenson https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1390695116822679559jerry_{May 7, 2021
May
05
May
7
07
2021
02:13 PM
2
02
13
PM
PDT}

More on the origins of C19. A long and very detailed article on the likelihood that C19 was engineered in the Wuhan Lab and escaped there due to lax safety procedures. https://nicholaswade.medium.com/origin-of-covid-following-the-clues-6f03564c038 The press won’t touch this because Trump made this claim and Fauci funded the research. Essentially they don’t care if large numbers die.
If the case that SARS2 originated in a lab is so substantial, why isn’t this more widely known? As may now be obvious, there are many people who have reason not to talk about it. The list is led, of course, by the Chinese authorities. But virologists in the United States and Europe have no great interest in igniting a public debate about the gain-of-function experiments that their community has been pursuing for years.
Did you know that the part of the virus that does harm is the spiked protein, the part of the virus that is injected into people with the vaccine. We are led to believe that the RNA injected is an irrelevant part of the virus. Instead it’s the lethal part. The amount injected may be too small to do most people harm but it may affect some. A question never brought up. The research at the Wuhan lab was trying to make a more lethal spike protein, one that would more easily attach to the ACE2 receptor and disable it. Thereby causing a chain reaction leading to clotting and thus, cardiovascular issues. So does the virus kills in two ways, first by massive replication destroying cells with the viral remnants causing the cytokine storm of the immune system and secondly, by disabling the ACE2 receptor leading to cardiovascular issues? Meanwhile the educated public which could easily understand this is kept in the dark. Instead anyone who discusses it is then accused of promoting conspiracy theories. By the way the author of this article, Nicholas Wade, is an ex NY Times science author who wrote a book on evolution a few years ago. I prefer to call it a book on genetics as that is what Darwin’s ideas really are.jerry_{May 5, 2021
May
05
May
5
05
2021
04:38 AM
4
04
38
AM
PDT}

Origins of C19? Did US fund origin of virus in Wuhan lab?
Exclusive Investigation: Separating rumor from fact on Covid-19's origin
https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/04/video-exclusive-investigation-separating-rumor-from-fact-on-covid-19s-origin/ A nine minute video plus a transcript to read. Will Uncle Tony get part of the blame? Is this a case of asking the wolf to investigate who broke into the chicken coop?jerry_{April 28, 2021
April
04
Apr
28
28
2021
05:24 AM
5
05
24
AM
PDT}

A recent opinion on HCQ
How the Hydroxychloroquine Scandal Wrecked America and the World Along With It This shameful distortion of medical science was emblematic of how politics not only crept into the treatment of the CCP virus, but bludgeoned that treatment and resulted in untold thousands, perhaps millions, of deaths, while simultaneously making life unbearable for an even greater number across the globe—in fact, for practically everyone.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/how-the-hydroxychloroquine-scandal-wrecked-america-and-the-world-along-with-it_3679350.html?v=ul They want your email to read but I used Outline to read it. Sometimes Outline is quirky but it worked for me. https://outline.com/ZXaqDG For the latest research on HCQ go to https://c19hcq.com/. There will be studies on all the treatments for C19 on this site. The latest HCQ study was published 4/23.jerry_{April 27, 2021
April
04
Apr
27
27
2021
06:12 AM
6
06
12
AM
PDT}

The Swedish doctor has an article on the reduction of infection if one has had C19. Do they too need the vaccine?
This works out to a relative risk reduction 0f 92%. For comparison, the Pfizer vaccine trial reported a reduction of 95%, the Moderna trial reported an reduction of 94%, the Astra-Zeneca trial reported a reduction of 70%, and the Johnson&Johnson trial reported a reduction of 67%. So, on the face of it, prior infection is equivalent to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines in terms of the level of protection offered, and much better than the Astra-Zeneca vaccine and J&J vaccine. In light of this, it seems completely unnecessary for people who have had covid to get the vaccine.
https://sebastianrushworth.com/2021/04/24/covid-prior-infection-vs-vaccination/ Instead give the vaccine to those who have not had C19.jerry_{April 26, 2021
April
04
Apr
26
26
2021
10:56 AM
10
10
56
AM
PDT}

A primer on vaccines and immunity for C19. Long video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrNQ8hkxHw8&t=12s Haven't watched it yet but plan to do so this weekend.jerry_{April 22, 2021
April
04
Apr
22
22
2021
10:10 AM
10
10
10
AM
PDT}

Nobody thinks they're the bad guy Lockdown skeptics & Zero Covid folks both believe they are morally sound How do you know who is correct? You look for those championing societal principles So, which group has advocated for freedom of speech, assembly, religion, & movement?
https://twitter.com/OBusybody/status/1382164310139367425jerry_{April 14, 2021
April
04
Apr
14
14
2021
05:02 AM
5
05
02
AM
PDT}

Is Big Tech masking the Truth
How Big Tech Masks COVID-19 Realities The country, Scott Atlas said, is in dangerous territory if people who show data contrary to conventional wisdom are silenced.
https://amgreatness.com/2020/10/19/how-big-tech-masks-covid-19-realities/jerry_{April 13, 2021
April
04
Apr
13
13
2021
02:44 PM
2
02
44
PM
PDT}

Jerry
Will the real issue in the near future be people living so long that it crowds out resources and opportunities for young people?
That is a serious issue already today as I see it.Silver Asiatic_{April 12, 2021
April
04
Apr
12
12
2021
10:36 AM
10
10
36
AM
PDT}

Many of you are aware of the censorship by Google, Twitter and others of contrary opinions. Here is the video that Google took down because it violates their liberal worldview. It was a round table hosted by Governor DeSantis on lockdowns, masks etc. https://www.aier.org/article/great-barrington-declaration-scientists-with-gov-desantis-in-florida/ This is just another example of the left trying to silence free speech.jerry_{April 12, 2021
April
04
Apr
12
12
2021
09:50 AM
9
09
50
AM
PDT}

Not C19 news but this could be used to monitor treatments for many diseases including advanced effects of C19 on body tissue. It’s looking inside the body with sound waves. https://mobile.twitter.com/Seeker/status/1381413004248371205 Amazing technology. Back to specific C19 issues.
Pentagon scientists reveal a microchip that senses COVID-19 in your body BEFORE you show symptoms and a filter that extracts the virus from blood
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9460389/Pentagon-scientists-invent-microchip-senses-COVID-19-body-symptoms.html Will the real issue in the near future be people living so long that it crowds out resources and opportunities for young people?jerry_{April 12, 2021
April
04
Apr
12
12
2021
05:14 AM
5
05
14
AM
PDT}

these are people who have felt it safe to go without a mask throughout the pandemic, not just not that they are vaccines. Therefore, of course they feel it is safe now.
Maybe they are better informed. There is no study that says masks make a difference but yet most are wearing them. Why should the better informed believe they make a difference since such a serially liar like Fauci is against them then for them.jerry_{April 10, 2021
April
04
Apr
10
10
2021
06:55 AM
6
06
55
AM
PDT}

I read that article before I saw your post about it. I think it's missing an important point. For instance, it says, "Among the vaccinated, just 14 percent said it’s safe now [to go out without a mask]. Among the unvaccinated, 45 percent said so. Ass -backwards." But the point it's missing is that the unvaccinated group includes lots of people who have never been interested in the precautions, haven't been concerned about the virus, and are reluctant to get vaccinated for a number of reason: to some extent these are people who have felt it safe to go without a mask throughout the pandemic, not just not that they are vaccines. Therefore, of course they feel it is safe now. So I think the article is misleading to not mention this obvious fact.Viola Lee_{April 10, 2021
April
04
Apr
10
10
2021
06:38 AM
6
06
38
AM
PDT}

Why get vaccinated if you think it won’t do any good?
Americans who do not plan to get vaccinated are more likely than vaccinated adults to believe it is safe to travel
https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/articles-reports/2021/04/09/half-vaccine-rejectors-believe-safe-travel-now What they (our elites) have found out that it’s easy to scare people and then keep them scared. Does anyone believe they will give up this power? I rarely wear a mask, only in places where it says you must. But outdoors in “Live Free or Die” New Hampshire most are wearing masks. Even most of the ones on bikes. My wife and I got vaccinated not because we believe it necessary for our health but because it is necessary for her to sing and for us to travel. Aside: For political reasons I have seen people let their relatives die rather than give them advice on effective treatments. That is how sick the country has gotten. Aside2: I asked my new doctor (we recently moved) if she would prescribe HCQ or Ivermectin if I asked for it if I contacted C19. She said she wouldn’t.jerry_{April 10, 2021
April
04
Apr
10
10
2021
05:32 AM
5
05
32
AM
PDT}

A year ago Dr. Knut Wittkowski predicted tat the virus would be made much worse by lockdowns and social distancing. In an article a couple weeks ago he claims that lockdowns are producing new epidemics. Dr. Knut Wittkowski is not any medical expert. He holds a masters degree in biostatistics, a PhD in computer science, a doctor of science and medical biometry, includingn genetics and epidemiology. He was also a former head of research, design and biostatistics at the Rockefeller Foundation. He also formerly headed the college of epidemiology at the Rockefeller University in New York https://dryburgh.com/knut-wittkowski-lockdowns-are-creating-a-new-virus/ Is this nonsense or are we exacerbating the situation?jerry_{April 8, 2021
April
04
Apr
8
08
2021
11:34 AM
11
11
34
AM
PDT}

Jerry: He forgot Pillar #5: People who refuse the vaccinations are the sons of the devil. It only took about a year to go from "two weeks to flatten the curve" to the push for vaccination "passports." I've got two words and a single digit for anyone who tries to push that on me.Concealed Citizen_{April 1, 2021
April
04
Apr
1
01
2021
10:59 AM
10
10
59
AM
PDT}

A hero of the C19 information news is a brand new Swedish doctor named Sebastian Rushworth. He has a new book published March 9th.
Covid: Why most of what you know is wrong
https://sebastianrushworth.com/2021/03/11/covid-why-most-of-what-you-know-is-wrong/ Guess what! Masks do little if anything. Yet a couple of commenters here treated my comment about this at different times as if I was delusional and more likely malevolent. Then there is extreme opposites, those who continually peach false doctrines such as Anthony Fauci. With his religion to just follow the pseudoscience. https://amgreatness.com/2021/03/31/the-four-pillars-of-the-branch-covidian-faith/jerry_{April 1, 2021
April
04
Apr
1
01
2021
10:16 AM
10
10
16
AM
PDT}

Adam Gaertner was ahead of the world. Just a year ago he was recommending Ivermectin.
One of the most active analysts during this pandemic regarding the treatment of COVID-19 has been independent researcher Adam Gaertner. He started looking for therapeutic solutions, including Ivermectin, in early 2020. When the Monarsh study was published, even if he soon recognized important weaknesses, he declared on Twitter on April 4 2020:
“Good news – #ivermectin shows extraordinary efficacy against #coronavirus …” adding in another tweet: “Ivermectin combination therapy appears to be an effective cure.”
This shows how at the forefront of therapeutic developments he was. Adam Gaertner did some video interviews, notably with Dr Mobeen Syed and with Dr Yo., in July / August 2020, and again, the usefulness of the drug at all stages, for prevention, early treatment and hospital level treatment, was emphasized. It’s now over a year that Adam Gaertner has had this keen interest in Ivermectin and has kept track of all the important developments regarding its use. His perspectives are therefore invaluable. In the first part of the interview, which was done in writing, we will look at prevention and treatment of COVID-19, while in the second, the focus will be on virological aspects.
https://covexit.com/the-adam-gaertner-interview-part-1/jerry_{March 30, 2021
March
03
Mar
30
30
2021
08:05 AM
8
08
05
AM
PDT}

Jerry, shrug . . . I guess we might as well add onward facts, here is the Vanden Bossch letter, to the technical community from " independent virologist and vaccine expert, formerly employed at GAVI and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundaton": https://www.docdroid.net/gjsmU1L/geert-vanden-bossche-3-pdf I clip a couple of juicy points: >> I can assure you that each of the current vaccines have been designed, developed and manufactured by brilliant and competent scientists. However, this type of prophylactic vaccines are completely inappropriate, and even highly dangerous, when used in mass vaccination campaigns during a viral pandemic. Vaccinologists, scientists and clinicians are blinded by the positive short-term effects in individual patents, but don’t seem to bother about the disastrous consequences for global health. Unless I am scientifically proven wrong, it is difficult to understand how current human interventions will prevent circulating variants from turning into a wild monster . . . . Given the level of emergency, I urged them to consider my concerns and to initiate a debate on the detrimental consequences of further ‘viral immune escape’ [a rough analogue of bacterial resistance to antibiotics] . . . . as we age, we will increasingly face situations where our innate immunity (often called ‘the first line of immune defense’) is not strong enough to halt the pathogen at the portal of entry (mostly mucosal barriers like respiratory or intestinal epithelia). When this happens, the immune system has to rely on more specialized effectors of our immune system (i.e., antigen-specific Abs and T cells) to fight the pathogen. So, as we grow up, we increasingly mount pathogen-specific immunity, including highly specific Abs. As those have stronger affinity for the pathogen (e.g., virus) and can reach high concentrations, they can quite easily outcompete our natural Abs for binding to the pathogen/virus. It is precisely this type of highly specific, high affinity Abs that current Covid-19 vaccines are inducing. Of course, the noble purpose of these Abs is to protect us against Covid-19. So, why then should there be a major concern using these vaccines to fight Covid-19? Well, similar to the rules applying to classical antimicrobial antibiotics, it is paramount that our self-made ‘antviral antibiotics’ are made available in sufficient concentration and are tailored at the specific features of our enemy. This is why in case of bacterial disease it is critcal to not only chose the right type of antibiotc (based on the results from an antbiogram) but to also take the antibiotc for long enough (according to the prescription). Failure to comply with these requirements is at risk of granting microbes a chance to survive and hence, may cause the disease to fare up. A very similar mechanism may also apply to viruses, especially to viruses that can easily and rapidly mutate (which is, for example, the case with Coronaviruses); when the pressure exerted by the army’s (read: population’s) immune defense starts to threaten viral replication and transmission, the virus will take on another coat so that it can no longer be easily recognized and, therefore, attacked by the host immune system. The virus is now able to escape immunity (so-called: ‘immune escape’). However, the virus can only rely on this strategy provided it still has room enough to replicate. Viruses, in contrast to the majority of bacteria, must rely on living host cells to replicate. This is why the occurrence of ‘escape mutants’ isn’t too worrisome as long as the likelihood for these variants to rapidly find another host is quite remote. However, that’s not particularly the case during a viral pandemic! >> Obviously, this can get into a losing war of catch-up with the latest mode or strain of an inherently rapidly mutating RNA virus, where herd immunity ever recedes as new variations perpetually escape vaccination driven attempts to impose global herd immunity. Which, in an age of global travel, becomes a significant question. Similarly, the vaccination approach should be seen as complementary to not in competition with identification of antiviral cocktails that give effective treatment. Last I looked, the countries that rejected the anti-HCQ message have has a 78% lower fatality rate on cases than those that marginalised it. Similarly, ivermectin has emerged from the shadow of HCQ to be a core of cocktail in its own right. However, emergency approvals are inherently done in face of uncertainty and a common regulatory device is to refuse such if there is a credible treatment. That put such cocktails with the usual Zn, Vits C and D and supportive antiniotics such as azithro or doxy, in perverse competition with the establishment's push for vaccines. Likewise, there is another backgrounder warning: hypersensitivity creation setting the stage for inducing deadly over-reactions to onward infections. 2012 - 13: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3335060/pdf/pone.0035421.pdf >>Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus Chien-Te Tseng [et al] . . . Because of a concern for reemergence or a deliberate release of the SARS coronavirus, vaccine development was initiated. Evaluations of an inactivated whole virus vaccine in ferrets and nonhuman primates and a virus-like-particle vaccine in mice induced protection against infection but challenged animals exhibited an immunopathologic-type lung disease . . . . These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.>> Have we initiated an unwinnable race with the virus and inadvertently made millions more prone to potentially deadly over-active immunoresponses? Time will tell but the concerns are clearly legitimate despite the now sadly usual dominant, domineering narratives. KFkairosfocus_{March 27, 2021
March
03
Mar
27
27
2021
04:00 AM
4
04
00
AM
PDT}

I wonder if this author saw the OP here on Dr Semmelweis. https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/03/covid_and_the_semmelweis_reflex.html It makes the analogy of how he was ignored just as several doctors in US have been ignored on the almost 100% success in treating C19.jerry_{March 26, 2021
March
03
Mar
26
26
2021
11:34 AM
11
11
34
AM
PDT}

The New Jersey governor with the worse C19 results on the planet criticizes Texas due to their mask regulations. Hypocrisy knows no bounds. https://twitter.com/ianmSC/status/1374472404848680973jerry_{March 25, 2021
March
03
Mar
25
25
2021
08:27 AM
8
08
27
AM
PDT}

If you identify yourself as a Democrat almost 70% believe the odds of one getting COVID and end up in the hospital is !0 times higher than it actually is. The belief is over 100 times higher for those who are treated early and end up in hospital. It’s not just Democrats that are misinformed, it’s 60% amongst Independents, 53% amongst Republicans. It’s amazing what fake news leads to. https://twitter.com/TheEliKlein/status/1373408037692710914 By inculcating the misinformation about treatment in the public, fake news has become a big time killer as most avoid treatment because they believe there isn’t any. No wonder people are scared of something that’s actually not true. It also show that if you are liberal you are more likely to be misinformed.jerry_{March 21, 2021
March
03
Mar
21
21
2021
05:15 AM
5
05
15
AM
PDT}

The failure of the American and world health medical establishment. https://americaoutloud.com/crisis-of-compassion/ An hour interview with one of the few brave doctors (Peter McCullough) who went against the trend. If I can get a transcript I will publish it. But that will be long. Dr. Peter McCullough is an academic internist and cardiologist from Dallas, Texas. He teaches at Baylor University.jerry_{March 17, 2021
March
03
Mar
17
17
2021
08:17 AM
8
08
17
AM
PDT}

Has America been Had? Lockdowns don’t impact covid-19 cases & deaths but they do have an effect on other things:
upwards trend Unemployment Murder Anxiety Depression Missed diagnoses Overdoses Youth suicide Poverty Missed vaccinations Child marriage Stillbirths Hunger Dementia
https://twitter.com/OBusybody/status/1362448680301780993 In 2019, Johns Hopkins & WHO warned:
Lockdowns don't work well for respiratory viruses Masking in community settings is not supported by data Mitigations must be weighed against their harms Politicians may abuse emergency powers
https://twitter.com/OBusybody/status/1371859167418458112jerry_{March 16, 2021
March
03
Mar
16
16
2021
10:16 AM
10
10
16
AM
PDT}

New game
Hasbro Releases Exciting New 'Fauci Says' Game U.S.—Hasbro has released an exciting new game called "Fauci Says," where you have to try to keep up with an electronic voice telling you to do a variety of tasks. Whether Fauci tells you to double-mask, close down schools, lock down forever, or jump off a bridge, you'll have to comply -- or you lose the game!" says the narrator over Hasbro's debut commercial for the game. "What wacky thing will Fauci have you do next? No one knows!" The commercial then shows a happy family competing in the game. They're all having fun, trying to mask, unmask, social-distance, then not social-distance, and perform a variety of contradictory instructions, until one of them fails to put on a seventh mask in time and is cast out of the family for being anti-science, per the game's instruction manual. "You just got Faucied!" the rest of the family says in glee as the young daughter packs her bags. "Sorry -- that's just FAUCI SAYS!"
https://babylonbee.com/news/hasbro-releases-exciting-new-game-of-fauci-says From America’s best parody source. Fake news you can trust.jerry_{March 12, 2021
March
03
Mar
12
12
2021
09:49 AM
9
09
49
AM
PDT}

That Dr. Fauci is NOT promoting the Eastern Virginia Medical School's prophylaxis, makes him a putz. It also puts many deaths on his hands for failure to act on the science-backed medical prophylaxis.ET_{March 12, 2021
March
03
Mar
12
12
2021
07:03 AM
7
07
03
AM
PDT}

Prev 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 24 Next

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Leave a Reply