Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

BREAKING: President Trump, Mrs Trump & Ms Hicks are Positive for CV-19

Categories
News Highlights
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Tweets:

Tonight, @ FLOTUS and I tested positive for COVID-19. We will begin our quarantine and recovery process immediately. We will get through this TOGETHER!
— Donald J. Trump (@ realDonaldTrump) October 2, 2020

Hope Hicks, who has been working so hard without even taking a small break, has just tested positive for Covid 19. Terrible! The First Lady and I are waiting for our test results. In the meantime, we will begin our quarantine process!
— Donald J. Trump (@ realDonaldTrump) October 2, 2020

When you thought an extraordinarily chaotic year could not pull out another twist. Well, here it is. END

PS: As broad context

PPS: For reference on HCQ

Also:

PPPS: A sampler from a former CEO, Twitter (cf discussion at Forbes [also here]) commented on by Michelle Malkin, a few days ago:

See, now, that this is NOT a normal silly season cycle?

PPPPS: A summary on the U/L trajectory of CV19:

Comments
A quote in honor of Fauci’s genius performance during C19.
"It takes real genius to doctor science according to fluctuating political opinion and get away with it.
jerry
March 12, 2021
March
03
Mar
12
12
2021
05:37 AM
5
05
37
AM
PDT
The UK is a large country with one of the highest death rates from C19. The advanced outpatient protocol of the British NHS is to do nothing. https://twitter.com/Covid19Crusher/status/1368977337144983552jerry
March 10, 2021
March
03
Mar
10
10
2021
10:26 AM
10
10
26
AM
PDT
A summary of all the bad decisions made in the last year about C19.
Scott Atlas: The Last Word
https://stanfordreview.org/scott-atlas-the-last-word/jerry
March 10, 2021
March
03
Mar
10
10
2021
06:03 AM
6
06
03
AM
PDT
Are obese people the cause of C19?
New study from World Obesity Federation found that 2.2 million of 2.5 million COVID-19 deaths occurred in countries with high levels of obesity
https://techstartups.com/2021/03/04/new-study-world-obesity-federation-found-2-2-million-2-5-million-covid-19-deaths-occurred-countries-high-levels-obesity/
This report shows that in countries where less than half the adult population is classified as overweight*, the likelihood of death from COVID-19 is a small fraction – around one-tenth – of the level seen in countries where more than half the population is classified as overweight. Of the 2.5 million COVID-19 deaths reported by the end of February 2021, 2.2 million were in countries where more than half the population is classified as overweight.”
jerry
March 6, 2021
March
03
Mar
6
06
2021
04:15 AM
4
04
15
AM
PDT
I will NOT get a covid-19 or influenza vaccine. The medically recommended prophylaxis works very well against all forms of both viruses. If the world would just use the medically recommended prophylaxis we could easily beat back the viruses. No vaccine required.ET
February 20, 2021
February
02
Feb
20
20
2021
06:46 AM
6
06
46
AM
PDT
I think the answer to this might be instructive. To everyone. Have you, or do yo plan to, receive the vaccine as soon as it is available to you?Steve Alten2
February 19, 2021
February
02
Feb
19
19
2021
03:52 PM
3
03
52
PM
PDT
Some C19 news
We’ll Have Herd Immunity by April
So do we need a vaccine? https://www.wsj.com/articles/well-have-herd-immunity-by-april-11613669731?reflink=desktopwebshare_twitter
New Oxford University study found that common asthma inhaler reduces COVID-19 by 90% in severe covid symptoms; Researchers say the effect is “equivalent to the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines”
Should we believe Oxford? They have been wrong on a lot of stuff https://techstartups.com/2021/02/13/new-oxford-university-study-found-common-asthma-inhaler-reduces-covid-19-90-severe-covid-symptoms-researchers-say-effect-equivalent-efficacy-covid-19-vaccines/
Why did Sweden have more covid deaths than its neighbors
But less than most of Western world. Interesting articles by young Swedish doctor. https://sebastianrushworth.com/2020/12/06/why-did-sweden-have-more-covid-deaths-than-its-neighbors/jerry
February 19, 2021
February
02
Feb
19
19
2021
10:13 AM
10
10
13
AM
PDT
The fix is in. Don’t like the data make up new data. Sweden became an embarrassment. How to make it go away.
So yes folks the fix is in. Don’t like what the control is telling you about your terrible experiment? Fudge the control data. If there is no control it’s much easier to make unverifiable assertions. This is all most convenient for the UK. Where is Oxford located again?
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1359911243147018243.html Oxford becomes the Cuomo of England as they revise data to support their bogus recommendations. They were also heavily involved in the promotion of false HCQ data. You cannot trust the press. You cannot trust the so-called prestige universities.jerry
February 12, 2021
February
02
Feb
12
12
2021
05:41 AM
5
05
41
AM
PDT
Apparently a group is Sweden does not like what the country has done in response to C19. Sweden ranks 19th in Europe in deaths per million and 23rd worldwide. It has had two spikes as have had most western nations. The recent one peaked January 1st. The last couple weeks have been very low. Keep that in mind when reading article. Here is English translation of article.
Hidden Facebook group tries to influence Swedish interests abroad The Swedish nation is described as brainwashed and responsible for the corona strategy as the perpetrator - statements in a campaign that worries experts in the field of information. The closed Facebook group with more than 200 members has received messages in major international media and posts describe attempts to get other countries' governments to act against Sweden during the pandemic. In an email to Ekot, the group's leaders write that they "do not want other countries to make the same mistakes as Sweden". Ekot and Vetenskapsradion have gained insight into the activities of a hidden Facebook group. Very serious allegations are spread in a social media campaign. Experts in the field of information influence consider the tone and methods to be worrying. The closed Facebook group with just over 200 members includes academics, opinion leaders, researchers at Swedish universities and others who are upset about Sweden's handling of the coronavirus. The members are largely active in Sweden, but the dialogue is conducted in English. We have gained insight into the closed group, the posts and activities for a long time. Members coordinate activities in the Facebook group and take the messages to the comment field, Twitter, Swedish and international media. They have received their messages in Time, Science, Washington Post, among others. Hanna Linderstål is an independent virtual analyst and works to strengthen the business community's and authorities' knowledge of the impact of information. - What we can see in this group's activities that make it interesting is partly that they court international media where they present Sweden as both a failure and that the authorities in Sweden would have a hidden agenda about the country's corona strategy, says Hanna Linderstål. Hanna Linderstål thinks that the group's processing of international and Swedish media is very worrying. - Among other things, other countries are urged not to let Swedes in, to protect the countries. And these are strong statements that are made about Sweden internationally, she says. The leader of the Facebook group describes in posts how members tried to influence governments in Europe to have quarantine rules for Swedes traveling abroad and to keep the borders closed to Sweden. He writes in posts about how messages have been sent to embassies, authorities and politicians in Europe. The leader of the Facebook group has declined a taped interview but writes in an email that they "do not want other countries to make the same mistakes as Sweden", and that the purpose of the Facebook group is to create a safe context for members to engage in opinion formation. James Pamment, associate professor of strategic communication at Lund University, has also analyzed the group's activity. It is one thing to try to influence Sweden's politics and form opinion, it is another thing to try to influence Swedish interests abroad, which can affect Swedish citizens. There, the group crosses a border, according to the experts that Ekot and Vetenskapsradion have spoken to. - It seems that the group has two purposes. Partly to influence the Swedish corona policy and partly to criticize media coverage of the policy. Then there is much else in the group that seems to be about damaging the image of Sweden abroad and also damaging the reputation of individuals who work in this field, says James Pamment. The leader of the Facebook group also describes in posts and on Twitter plans to try to bring those responsible for the corona strategy in Sweden before an international court for crimes against humanity. It is described as absurd by experts in international law with whom we spoke. They emphasize that this criminal classification is about deliberate attacks on the civilian population and which is primarily used in wars and conflicts. Listen to the entire review in the program "Vetenskapsradion På djupet" in P1.
https://sverigesradio.se/artikel/dold-facebookgrupp-forsoker-paverka-svenska-intressen-utomlandsjerry
February 9, 2021
February
02
Feb
9
09
2021
11:53 AM
11
11
53
AM
PDT
HCQ is shown to have a positive effect in 100% of studies analyzed when administered early. It is not a cure in the sense that it makes everyone free of the virus and healthy but it does this for a high percentage of those who take it early (66%.)
• HCQ is effective for COVID-19. The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 200 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 3 quadrillion (p = 0.00000000000000034). • Early treatment is most successful, with 100% of studies reporting a positive effect and an estimated reduction of 66% in the effect measured (death, hospitalization, etc.) using a random effects meta-analysis, RR 0.34 [0.27-0.44]. • 91% of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) for early, PrEP, or PEP treatment report positive effects, the probability of this happening for an ineffective treatment is 0.0059. • There is evidence of bias towards publishing negative results. 88% of prospective studies report positive effects, and only 75% of retrospective studies do. • Studies from North America are 3.6 times more likely to report negative results than studies from the rest of the world combined, p = 0.00000044. Total - 200 studies 3,178 authors, 172,633 patients Positive effects, 156 studies, 2,477 authors, 128,690 patients, Early treatment - 100% positive effects 26 studies, 18,751 patients 66% average improvement
https://hcqmeta.com/hcq-meta.pdf Only negative effects are in late treatment after the virus has done replicating. Most of the studies were done in late treatment situations when it would not be expected to work. The ignorance of the medical community especially Dr. Fauci in not recognizing this has let over a million people die worldwide unnecessarily.jerry
February 7, 2021
February
02
Feb
7
07
2021
11:43 AM
11
11
43
AM
PDT
Jerry, yes there is an evolving situation that shifts balance of questions on HCQ cocktails. I am thinking of a follow up post. As for ivermectin, it surfaced many months ago as part of the cocktail. The issue of effective antivirals and that of a stitch in time saves nine are not going to go away. Sadly, the we have to be rid of this pestilential fellow and his deplorables taints the whole story and may yet lead to a terrible verdict when objective history is written. KFkairosfocus
February 2, 2021
February
02
Feb
2
02
2021
01:57 AM
1
01
57
AM
PDT
Link should be https://outline.com/TFLjpk Somehow an extra k got on the endjerry
February 1, 2021
February
02
Feb
1
01
2021
07:17 AM
7
07
17
AM
PDT
The left and elites hav no regrets. Killing little and old people is just part of their character makeup. Then they can blame it on others.
How the Hydroxychloroquine Scandal Wrecked America and the World Along With It You don’t have to be Emile Zola to say “J’accuse!” I accuse—in no particular order—Time’s ‘Person of the Year’ nominee and frequent Wuhan, China visitor/collaborator Dr. Anthony Fauci; the Democrat Party (aka the “party of science”) and their nauseating, self-congratulatory leadership; the mainstream media and all their pompous, even more self-congratulatory “ships at sea” from the New York Times to CNN; Dr. Birx and whatever bureaucrat from the CDC was showing his/her face this week; the endless echo chamber in practically every health department in all fifty states; the foreign health departments that largely echoed that echo chamber; Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York (more of him in a moment); Governor Whitmer of Michigan; that atrocious governor of Nevada whose name I can’t remember or bother to look up…. I could go on… all of whom participated in what has emerged to be what is indisputably the greatest national, no, international, health disaster of our time—the Hydroxychloroquine Scandal.
https://outline.com/TFLjpkK This is in Epoch Times and behind a paywall so is linked by Outline.jerry
February 1, 2021
February
02
Feb
1
01
2021
05:34 AM
5
05
34
AM
PDT
Ivermectin is the new HCQ. https://twitter.com/Covid19Critical It is being thrust forward by a group of doctors as the miracle cure for C19. Wasn’t recommended by Trump so not getting the negative publicity HCQ did. But not getting any positive publicity either. Why would ivermectin be needed now that there is a vaccine? Or maybe better rephrased as why would a vaccine be needed now that there is an effective treatment?jerry
January 27, 2021
January
01
Jan
27
27
2021
10:45 AM
10
10
45
AM
PDT
A sentiment that a lot of people have
IF YOU HAVE ACCEPTED THE BELIEF, THAT ASYMPTOMATIC PEOPLE ARE "INFECTIOUS", YOU HAVE JUST CURSED YOURSELF FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE. ALL TRUST AND AUTHENTIC CONNECTION GETS DESTROYED WHEN YOU ALLOW YOUR FELLOW HEALTHY HUMANS TO BECOME A THREAT. THIS IS NOT THE "NEW NORMAL". THIS IS COLLECTIVE PARANOID PSYCHOSIS. Carrie Madej, D.O.
Also from Dr. Madej
I UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE THINGS I POST ARE DEPRESSING. ITS NOT EASY TO HEAR ABOUT SOME OF THE DARKER THINGS THAT GO ON IN THE WORLD. BUT THERE ARE CHILDREN & PEOPLE SUFFERING EVERYDAY.. WE ARE BEING DECEIVED BY THE MEDIA, HOLLYWOOD, THE MUSIC INDUSTRY & POLITICIANS. IT'S YOUR CHOICE WHETHER YOU IGNORE IT ALL OR EXPOSE IT.. I CHOOSE T0 EXPOSE IT
jerry
January 26, 2021
January
01
Jan
26
26
2021
09:06 AM
9
09
06
AM
PDT
you do realise that that’s a nonsense question, don’t you? Social isolation isn’t an infectious disease.
You do realize that it is absolutely not nonsense because social isolation kills? If it does kill, it will have a rate of killing. You catch it from others who are unaware of its life threatening effects and inflict it on you. Sometimes it is self afflicted. Whether it kills higher than C19 does is a question to be answered. Especially since there are effective treatments for C19 and the social isolation recommendations may be very counterproductive. Teen suicides are now getting newsworthy. Aside:
higher than the deaths from Covid-19 that would be avoided.
Are there any? Especially when early treatments are so effective. Another question. Do masks actually accelerate infection?jerry
January 26, 2021
January
01
Jan
26
26
2021
06:49 AM
6
06
49
AM
PDT
Masks forever?
Mask Mandates: Are There Better Ways to Control COVID-19 Outbreaks? These numbers suggest that the strategy of relying predominantly on social distancing, lockdowns and mask-wearing is not working. We need better interventions. Although mask-wearing may reduce transmission rate, it has not prevented cases from spiking either here or abroad.
https://www.heritage.org/public-health/commentary/mask-mandates-are-there-better-ways-control-covid-19-outbreaks Not one word in article about treatment as a strategy. We really are in an Alice in Wonderland world.jerry
January 26, 2021
January
01
Jan
26
26
2021
06:42 AM
6
06
42
AM
PDT
Jerry - you do realise that that's a nonsense question, don't you? Social isolation isn't an infectious disease. I think what you want to ask is whether death rate due to working at home/staying at home etc. is higher (presumably in people who don't catch COVID-19), and then whether the expected number of deaths due to these impositions is higher than the deaths from Covid-19 that would be avoided.Bob O'H
January 24, 2021
January
01
Jan
24
24
2021
04:16 AM
4
04
16
AM
PDT
What do you think the IFR of social isolation is?
Below is a table detailing the factors most important in reducing your chances of dying, based on Julianne Holt-Lunstad's comprehensive study. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EsU8nsVXYAE5mZ9.png
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1352621925139443717.htmljerry
January 23, 2021
January
01
Jan
23
23
2021
05:05 PM
5
05
05
PM
PDT
Transparency in applying science from our bettors
California keeps key virus data out of public sight California Gov. Gavin Newsom has from the start said his coronavirus policy decisions would be driven by data shared with the public to provide maximum transparency. But with the state starting to emerge from its worst surge, his administration won’t disclose key information that will help determine when his latest stay-at-home order is lifted. State health officials said they rely on a very complex set of measurements that would confuse and potentially mislead the public if they were made public.
https://apnews.com/article/sacramento-california-coronavirus-pandemic-gavin-newsom-38bb44ea7cb39eab9f6f6c621daeaf10 Of course Governor Newsom and his co workers practice strict mask discipline when discussing government business. https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/0e0948f6e004438a9a1d78632c915b9f/800.jpegjerry
January 23, 2021
January
01
Jan
23
23
2021
12:46 PM
12
12
46
PM
PDT
It’s not clear if it was actually done
Thank you for the warning about the study. I was unaware of Fleming's background. However, given. that, the approach seems reasonable. That different types of imaging could be used to evaluate treatment effects of various drugs on cell tissue. What is interesting about the discussion is that it reaffirms that COVID is serial and essentially separate diseases. What works on restricting the virus will not work on the effects of the immune system over reacting and causing most of deaths. So giving anti-virals late in the progression of the disease is pointless and shouldn't be expected to be effective. It's amazing how little the so called prominent researchers/epidemiologists/immunologists know about this disease but are willing to pontificate on it and subsequently set government policy based on these inaccurate understandings. One of which is a hero to a lot of the American public, Anthony Fauci who has demonstrated his Ignorance numerous times. There is the other effect which is a direct result of the virus nullifying the effect of the ACE2 receptors on the endothelial cells in the blood stream and causing clotting mechanisms to appear. This is the second serious effect of the virus and is direct. But apparently while this is dangerous, it is. the over reaction of the immune systems causing most of the damage. For most this virus is not harmful but for a few with impaired immune systems it is dangerous.jerry
January 22, 2021
January
01
Jan
22
22
2021
09:26 AM
9
09
26
AM
PDT
Jerry @ 518 - that "study" is discussed on Retraction Watch (including in the comments). It's not clear if it was actually done, and if it was whether it would be legal. Basically, it's by a convicted fraudster.Bob O'H
January 22, 2021
January
01
Jan
22
22
2021
07:11 AM
7
07
11
AM
PDT
COVID19 recovery rate update, as of 1/2/20: According to WHO calculations: 0.108% death rate, 99.89% recovery rate. According to CDC calculations: 0.217% death rate, 99.78% recovery rate. In November, the range was 99.75(CDC)%-99.875(WHO)% recovery rate. Terrifying pandemic?
https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1345483891226902529 Latest
1/21/2021 update: COVID-19 recovery rate, according to WHO calculations: 99.893% COVID-19 recovery rate according to CDC calculations: 99.786%
jerry
January 22, 2021
January
01
Jan
22
22
2021
05:34 AM
5
05
34
AM
PDT
For 400,000 people it was worse than a cold. And my daughter has 8-12 months of recovery (we hope) on her lungs. And she is a alternative health professional who not only took the OTC supplements you recommend but a number of specialized anti-viral herbs. Extrapolating from your own case (n = 1) to the general case is not very scientific.Viola Lee
January 20, 2021
January
01
Jan
20
20
2021
08:34 AM
8
08
34
AM
PDT
Covid 19 can be easily fought off with OTC supplements. For me it isn't any worse than the flu. I fight them both with the same supplements. People's stupidity and ignorance are getting them killed. And we will never know how many actual cases of covid there have been. Everyone that I know who got it, survived. The people who followed my advice didn't even require hospitalization. The worst was a migraine.ET
January 20, 2021
January
01
Jan
20
20
2021
08:02 AM
8
08
02
AM
PDT
Meanwhile, the numbers of COVID-19 related deaths in the US has gone over 400,000. And I was accused of scare-mongering when I suggested it could get up to 200,000. Of the over 15 million cases that have had a definitive outcome the death rate is 3%. Does anyone still want to claim this is no worse than seasonal flu? https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/JVL
January 20, 2021
January
01
Jan
20
20
2021
02:15 AM
2
02
15
AM
PDT
Just to update you on Dr. Zelenko. His twitter feed is gone. Can't have someone telling you how to treat and beat the C19 virus. But his website is available. https://www.vladimirzelenkomd.com The prophylactic treatment is still the same. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i7C_6H1Yq0u8lrzmnzt5N1JHg-b5Hb0E3nLixedgwpQ/editjerry
January 19, 2021
January
01
Jan
19
19
2021
10:16 AM
10
10
16
AM
PDT
I have been meaning to publish this for a couple weeks.
Is there a treatment for SARS-CoV-2? Quantitative Nuclear Imaging finds Treatments for SARS-CoV-2
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-106988/v1
Introduction: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic of 2019 represents the third significant infection from a corona virus during the last two decades; this time producing a pandemic with more than a million deaths due to the immune InflammoThrombotic Response (ITR) to the virus. This investigation studied 10 different treatments and 52 treatment combinations to determine if there is an effective treatment regimen for SARS-CoV-2. Conclusion: The answer to the question is, Yes. The treatment of SARS-CoV-2, like HIV, requires a multi-drug treatment regimen focusing on the immune ITR to SARS-CoV-2. The three successful treatment regimens include (1) Tocilizumab & Interferon a-2b, (2) Primaquine, Clindamycin, Tocilizumab & Interferon a-2b, and (3) Methylprednisolone. These three regimens were effective 99.83% of the time and shortened hospital stays from 40?±?3 days to 1–2 weeks.
What this part of the abstract does not state here is that there were a total of 1800 patients and 953 were treated with some form of HCQ treatment and 847 had no treatment as outpatients. Of those treated with HCQ+ 84.4% did not require hospitalization. Of those not treated with anything, 59.5% did not require hospitalization. So this study is essentially reporting on the treatments given in the hospital but also reports on the effectiveness of HCQ in an outpatient setting.
Of the 1800 patients seeking medical care, 847 received no outpatient treatment with 59.5% recovering and 40.5% requiring hospitalization. Of the 953 treated with an aminoquinoline (HCQ) in the outpatient setting, 16.6% required further treatment and hospitalization. Five hundred and one people required admission representing a 27.8% failure to respond to outpatient management. Apparently zinc was administered as part of the out patient treatment.
Treatments in the hospital with HCQ+ did not have any effect. This would make sense since HCQ is mainly an anti viral and at the phase that requires hospitalization it is a new disease involving the immune system and cardio vascular system. I realize that few people are reading these comments but they are valuable to me as a record as I develop reference for my family and others who I know are interested.jerry
January 13, 2021
January
01
Jan
13
13
2021
01:39 PM
1
01
39
PM
PDT
Vit D has been recommended. It's one of the first things my doctor recommended when I was quarantined due to contact with a positive case. In fact, even before covid, vit D was a main supplement that my doctor recommended for general immunity health, especially through the cold season. There isn't much of a downside to taking substantial amounts of Vit D, I don't think. I take 2000 IU daily. I remember when my elderly mother was tremendously deficient they gave her an injection of 50,000 IU monthly for a while. I don't think there is much of a controversy about the value of Vit D, although I doubt that it is a surefire preventative of any kind.Viola Lee
January 11, 2021
January
01
Jan
11
11
2021
01:53 PM
1
01
53
PM
PDT
Vitamin D and COVID-19: Is There a Lack of Risk/Reward Understanding Among Health Authorities? Yes. The ignorance is astounding "Potentially, hundreds of thousands of people could be saved if health authorities would recommend vitamin D to the population"
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346423180_Vitamin_D_and_COVID-19_Is_There_a_Lack_of_RiskReward_Understanding_Among_Health_Authorities Vitamin D is a key ingredient in fighting C19. Remember when a negative poster here who identified as “Retired Physicist” ridiculed ET on his advocacy of Vitamin D.jerry
January 11, 2021
January
01
Jan
11
11
2021
01:25 PM
1
01
25
PM
PDT
1 … 4 5 6 7 8 … 24