Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

UD Live Event from Nov 3, US Election cont’d: BBC — yes the BEEB — on BLM’s Marxist founders, “[We] fought to change history and we won”

Categories
Control vs Anarchy
Defending our Civilization
Geo-strategic issues
News Highlights
Politics
rhetoric
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Okay, we are looking at the victory lap being taken (a bit prematurely, methinks) by the BLM trio of marxist founders. Here is BEEB:

Black Lives Matter founders: We fought to change history and we won

Published14 hours ago

The year 2020 will be remembered for a lot of things – not least the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement around the world.

The organisation has led huge street rallies and high-profile campaigns against racism and police brutality.

Now the three women who founded the movement have told the BBC they believe it has transformed politics.

“Black people alongside our allies stood up to change the course of history and we won,” said Alicia Garza.

Garza and her BLM co-founders, Patrisse Cullors and Opal Tometi, spoke as part of the BBC 100 Women Masterclass 2020, a digital live event of masterclasses, big interviews and guests on 30 November.

If you doubted that this is a Marxism-driven, colour-culture revolution push using Critical Race Theory as key ideological wedge, there you have it from the horses’ mouths.

In short, 4th Gen War:

. . . based on colour/cultural revolution insurgency, including dirty form McFaul programme election manipulation:

Okie, Dec 17, I clip from 1333 below, a focal point:

Just remember, given the realities of 4th gen war, there is now no hard border — no specific, momentous declaratory threshold — between

a: information and influence operations [including, too often “education”];

b: politics, law and power balances stratagems, and

c: full bore high kinetics war.

The intent of all three in ruthless hands, subjugation under a new lawless oligarchy, demands that we understand that tri-polar spectrum, and that we determine to stand for a civilisation of truth, right, honour and liberty in the face of its most insidious, treacherous enemies.

H’mm, Dec 15, let’s add in the Overton Window (with hints of Plato’s Parable of the Cave), to help us understand political/policy thinking in light of BATNA points:

Where, we need to ponder the change challenge:

. . . and the Mountains/pillars of influence mapping model:

Where are we drifting to, why and how?

Now, let us continue the already in progress [for four weeks!] live event . . . from here.

First U/D, the Arizona hearing when I can get it up.

Meanwhile, ponder just what is being said now, and what it implies beyond how they would wish it spun, given their admitted Marxism. BREAKING, CONTINUING (AFTER FOUR WEEKS) . . .

U/D1: Arizona hearings:

https://youtu.be/QfC2T7UpxkI

U/D2: Ms Powell with Mr Dobbs on state of play, a case in VA on the table. Also, even as a restraining order was being debated in a see-saw back-forth, in Fulton County, a Server was taken by a technician on excuse of software update and has disappeared from chain of custody. From CA, a tape has been forwarded to Ms Powell and reveals 550 votes from 270 people, an indication of algorithmic manipulation:

Ms Powell, the entire FBI and Dept of Justice need to be hosed out with Chlorox and firehoses.

F/N: Was the Electoral College simply a way to entrench slavery — merely ramshackle defence of slavery? A discussion on republic vs direct instant effect democracy:

[PREDICTABLY, SADLY, CENSORED]

U/D2, Dec 2, hearings in MI:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZXkAv7yKgw

U/D3, Dec 2: HT BA77, we now have chain of custody on ballots going into PA by the trailer-load. The ballots seen coming in at wee hours were in similar containers:

U/D4, Dec 2: Spykman’s framework of heartland, rimland and the outer crescent of maritime Islands and continents:

This is the framework for geostrategic analysis. Desperately compressed, c 1904 Mackinder identified that rail, telegraph, telephone etc allowed mobilisation of continental resources in the heart of the Eurasian landmass that would counterweight the maritime powers, i.e. Britain with the US coming up behind. C20 can be viewed as the history of two German grabs and one Russian one, failed. Rimlands are a belt between, coast and near hinterlands. The outer arc is where maritime power and sea trade dominate. Thus, the chief maritime power guarantees global stability.

I have argued as follows c April 2016, the current US 4th gen civil war with global entanglement is a playing out of this picture. Notice the Iranian push, vulture no. 3. No Ko is a wannabe:

U/D5, Dec 2, Ordinary people have their say (and often get smeared by the media dominant narrative — a comment):

Hannity shows ordinary witnesses.Twitter so no YT link.

U/D6, Dec 4: Here is the Oct 2016 video of independent body blackbox voting dot org:

Note, from commented screen captures:

U/D7, Mr Giuliani requests disciplinary action for defamation violation of parliamentary privilege, regarding dismissal of evidence and attacking his professional integrity:

In the course of this he corrects widespread talking points: 3 cases brought not the 39 being talked about. 2,000 affidavits under penalty of law, and we know now of the video of four suitcases of ballots counted after scrutineers were dismissed, being told that counting was over for the night, in GA.

The member signalling intent to dox and harass a witness by demanding even her maiden name should take due note.

U/D8, Dec 5: Smoking gun? (Video here.) The midnight, unsupervised ballot counting in GA — though strictly, the count from its outset with scrutineers corralled, was invalid:

U/D9, Dec 7, concerns that Dominion machines have flipped votes and on a test run a sequestered machine has continued to do so:

Cf. Expert testimony:

https://youtu.be/ijtaV5Twf6o

Cybersecurity expert, Russell Ramsland is speaking under the umbrella of his affidavit.

U/D, Dec 10, Lou Dobbs on the “Russian intelligence”/ “conspiracy theory” dismissive talking points on Mr Hunter Biden (with implications that his chief asset on offer was access) and Ms Powell’s unleashing of the Kracken:

https://youtu.be/IQjjjrR9QUY

[PREDICTABLY, CENSORED]

U/D11, Dec 11: Here is a framework for addressing media spin and gaslighting, agit-prop etc:

As it is such a glaring example on what was said in the “fine people” remarks, and as Sandy brought it up, let me add this correction from the record . . . yes, transcript, on Charlottesville:

U/D13, Dec 12, here is a backgrounder on Alcibiades which also gives a useful survey of the Peloponnesian war. One hopes, this will not be censored:

U/D14, Dec 12 HT BA77, Dominion demonstrations, part 1:

. . . and part 2:

5:04 on in this part 2 shows scanning in then voting a BLANK ballot, which the operator says “totally bothers me.”

She demonstrates also how adjudicated ballots can be voted.

We separately know that the scanner can mark ballots, sold as a feature for the visually impaired.

In short there is now no responsible doubt that the sort of manipulation discussed is a real capability — means. Frustration of scrutineering creates opportunity and decisively undermines integrity of the election vote counts. Motive is easy, power in the midst of a 4th Gen Civil war, in the form of a colour-culture revolution push, theme colour black. The testimony of many witnesses, statistical red flags etc point to actual occurrence, but recall, this is secondary. The primary issue is massive injection of effectively uncontrolled mail in ballots with 3rd party ballot harvesting and similar frustration of scrutineering implying dubious chain of custody.

All of this then points to the 26 years of history going back to the PA case of 1994 and through the exposure of election gadgetry since the early 2000’s, then rejections by CA and TX as well as links to Venezuela and more.

I strongly suggest, download the videos for yourself before they vanish into the censorship black hole.

U/D15: Hima’s testimony, something needs to be fixed here:

U/D16, Dec 13: I think it is profitable to look at a backgrounder on Mountains/pillars of influence, dominant worldviews and agendas, the change challenge and the crooked yardstick effect. First, the seven mountains, a mapping model for dealing with a corrupt culture as a remnant of soundness under God (originally, Schaeffer et al, 1970’s):

Linked, the Machiavelli change-timing challenge:

Underlying problem: crooked yardsticks vs plumb-lines:

Deeper background, a sounder view on political spectrum:

Further deeper understanding of an en-darkened civilisation, adapting Schaeffer’s vision:

Our civilisation is at obvious kairos, a hinge of history, with major dangers and opportunities. It is time to be good people of the remnant in the face of an Ac 27 storm.

U/D17, Dec 14, Ms Powell on the state of the American Courts and Republic on a date that most likely will live in infamy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKfK8jkSwPA

(Has this ALREADY been censored?)

Lou Dobbs with Ms Powell:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGEmSMLgVeY

U/D18, Dec 16: A summary of the lesson of 1876/77, on the price paid for a devil’s bargain that swallowed electoral fraud:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HbSgCpPors

Yes, the Democrats refused to acknowledge fraud and a devil’s bargain was struck over 20 electors that stopped Reconstruction in a way that opened up the abuses that lingered to the 1960’s.

U/D19, Dec 19: a summary of red flags from the Navarro Report, so we can see in the context of being an evidence summary:

U/D20: The “Solar Winds” Cyber attack, apparently in progress for 6 months, with direct entanglement with the tainted election (cf. 17:00 on):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=869&v=3T9VDichLPM&feature=youtu.be

[predictably, poof!]

China is named, along with Iran and North Korea. As well as, of course, Russia having been widely deemed suspect no. 1. This is an obvious example of an information-influence operation as act of 4G war, connecting the local civil conflict in the US to the global conflict, de facto WW4. Forbes comments:

The recently discovered cyber attacks against numerous U.S. government departments and  thousands of public and private sector entities around the world, via a compromise of SolarWinds software, underscore the risks associated with third party vendors and raise questions about liability. The attacks were allegedly perpetrated by Russia and were highly sophisticated . . . .

The attackers compromised the software “signature” of SolarWinds’s Orion network monitoring software and distributed malware as a software update. Public and private encryption keys are used to “sign” software. A software update is “signed” using an encryption algorithm and the developer’s private key, which creates a hash “signature.”  This “signature” is validated by the receiver of the software update by using the sender’s public key. The signature process assures the integrity of the update and instills trust in users of the software. 

In a December 14 SEC filing, SolarWinds said that of its more than 300,000 customers, they believed that less than 18,000 entities may have downloaded the Orion update during the March-June 2020 timeframe [–> the 6 months timeline], which likely included the malware. The malware operated stealthily and exfiltrated valuable intellectual property, confidential and proprietary data, emails, and other valuable information from victims’ systems. It was unknown until prominent cybersecurity firm FireEye, also a victim of the attacks, discovered the malware and reported on the attacks on December 13, 2020.

According to FireEye, once installed in a system, the malware remained quiet for a couple of weeks and then masqueraded as the Orion Improvement Program protocol. It stored data from its internal activities within actual SolarWinds files on the system, thereby making its detection all the more difficult.  The malware had highly credentialed access to the system and could disable system services, reboot machines, exfiltrate data, execute files, change system configurations, and perform actions usually taken by a highly privileged system administrator.

That sounds rather familiar, and illustrates what happens if a trusted supplier is compromised. Gen Flynn’s remarks at 16:05 on are worth transcribing:

When we talk about our election security . . . I think this is all part of it, because there is a relationship between this solar winds attack; which has basically penetrated our entire critical infrastructure as well as our election security. So we have to look at everything we’re doing . . . okay with all of the egregious behaviour that we’ve seen on our election security we cannot stand for foreign influence, which we have direct evidence of foreign influence. We also have direct evidence now from other countries, from other foreign partners who have evidence.

In fact they were watching the attacks on our election system, on our election process on the 3rd of November and they are willing to provide that directly to the President.

So we now have that evidence and have received that today. It’s very important.

So there are foreign partners and allies that are willing to help us with our election security and this Solar Winds system is really really dangerous and more has to be done.

The likely allies obviously include Israel, likely Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and possibly Australia given the focus on China.

Again, we are back to whose report do you believe, why.

U/D21, Dec 23: It was not possible to find the 1984 Movie through a Google search (yes, they are that unconscious of the irony) but DDG showed it, here is a colour version at YT, this may be pretty important holiday viewing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wl4kt4kUE88

If that gets purged, here is Web Archive.

U/D22, Dec 28: Understand the anger of the perpetually manipulated:

One does not have to endorse the above across the board to see that it has a telling point or two about the “Uniparty” and the issue of fundamentally unaccountable elites, leading a manipulated march of folly. Here, the lesson of Ac 27 is again all too relevant.

U/D23: A Canadian Lawyer and an American Lawyer discuss — as an example — the dismissal of the Wisconsin care; an example of how the election fraud concerns are being sidelined:

U/D24, Jan 3, what the Ukrainians have to say about corruption and investigation, through an Interfax press conference. Such needs to be soberly addressed in detail:

Comments
BA77
" it is only 6 counties, out of 3006 counties, where the votes are in dispute"
With all respect to Mr. Freeman (who I had not heard of before), is that correct?Silver Asiatic
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
10:03 AM
10
10
03
AM
PST
AC
Huh? I’m saying you can interchange father and mother, and parent in certain contexts.
I pointed out that in certain contexts you cannot interchange them. You seem to disagree with this and are claiming there's an equivalency in the rule change below, as well as there being some need or social requirement for making the changes - but there is neither of these.
In clause 8(c)(3) of rule XXIII, strike ‘‘father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in- law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, step-mother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, step- sister, half brother, half sister, grandson, or grand-daughter’’ and insert ‘‘parent, child, sibling, parent’s sibling, first cousin, sibling’s child, spouse, parent- in-law, child-in-law, sibling-in-law, stepparent, step-child, stepsibling, half-sibling, or grandchild’’.
Silver Asiatic
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
09:58 AM
9
09
58
AM
PST
@Silver Asiatic:
My point was that this is an attack against our heritage and culture. You’re saying “yes, such an attack is necessary”. So, you affirmed my point.
I've pointed out that the old rules were manipulating the public by prescribing a certain language (here I'm using your language). The new rules do not change that fact.
Here you’re saying that the terms mother and father are equivalent.
Huh? I'm saying you can interchange father and mother, and parent in certain contexts. Just look at the old rules (the ones without the changes):
page 1009: the term "parent" is used: The identity and category of value of the total liabilities owed to any creditor other than a spouse, or a parent, brother, (...)
page 977: the term "parent" is used Such a payment may not exceed $2,000 or be made to a charitable organization from which the Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer, or employee or a parent, sibling, (...)
page 958: the terms "father" and "mother" are used: As used in this paragraph, the term 'relative' means an individual who is related to the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner as father, mother, son, (...)
I also was wondering about you saying:
Now, people are forced to use the terms prescribed by the rules.
Is this really true? That would mean, people were already not allowed to use the word "father" in context of page 1009 and page 977. I doubt that's true. Does the document deny that "father" is a "parent"?AndyClue
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
09:04 AM
9
09
04
AM
PST
"For the most part it is only 6 counties, out of 3006 counties, where the votes are in dispute.,,, the voting and counting there, (in those 6 counties) was not clear and transparent. There are multiple credible reports of voting irregularities and some of outright fraud,,," - Here Is The Evidence,, Now Show Us The Ballots - video - 2:46 mark https://youtu.be/3tn7cTFSIJE?t=166bornagain77
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
08:27 AM
8
08
27
AM
PST
More stonewalling, this time in New Mexico,,, New Mexico GOP Accuses Secretary of State of Withholding Election Records From Trump BY TOM OZIMEK January 1, 2021 ,,,, the Secretary of State is partisan and defiant in refusing to uphold and oversee election integrity. She just makes up her rules. There’s no transparency of government here,” Pearce said. https://www.theepochtimes.com/new-mexico-gop-accuses-secretary-of-state-of-withholding-election-records-from-trump_3640190.html as one commenter noted, "The lack of transparency in itself is evidence of voter fraud. The Dems keep proving that Biden only won by fraud." i.e. these are not the actions of innocent people trying to clear their name but are the actions of guilty people trying to cover their tracks!bornagain77
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
07:35 AM
7
07
35
AM
PST
BA77
Proof of fraud may lie in vanishing Trump votes (with video clip from Scott Adams of Dilbert fame)
I like how Scott Adams sorted through all of the claims and concluded that only one is required to show proof of fraud. Over a short period of time, Trump's vote-counts showed losses. The only way this is not conclusive proof of fraud is: 1. The professional data scientists misunderstood the data. 2. This information will be blocked, suppressed, ignored, covered-up, etc On the first one, I'd think that the chances of these data scientists, making a huge mistake like that, after analysis and going public with their findings (and offering their results for independent review) is very, very small. Polling data is not complex. It's just counts of records in a sequence of time. Maybe there is some complexity in joining data tables - as the scientists pointed out. But this is the basic sort of thing data analysts do on a day-to-day basis. Less qualified analysts do this with important financial data, where a slight miscalculation has serious consequences. The chances that two data scientists, misread simple polling data? I think it's about zero. The second option is what happens when people do not want to see the truth about things.Silver Asiatic
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
06:29 AM
6
06
29
AM
PST
AC @ 1975
They were already manipulating the public with the old rules, by prescribing a certain language
My point was that this is an attack against our heritage and culture. You're saying "yes, such an attack is necessary". So, you affirmed my point.
You can call someone a father. A father is a parent, right?
Here you're saying that the terms mother and father are equivalent. They can both be replaced by the term parent. "Mrs. Jackson has just given birth to twins. She is the father of the family". As I said, that destroys the term "father" and it's a deliberate attack on fatherhood itself. It also demeans the role of mother, indicating that there is no difference between mother and father.Silver Asiatic
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
06:20 AM
6
06
20
AM
PST
AC, these days, high performance ARM processors are effectively in everything, thanks to the smart phone. The processing power to do backdoors, exfiltration of info, mods and more just simply are there. I wonder if people realise every smartphone in a meeting is a bug in effect. Don't get me started on Alexa -- call her name and she answers . . . so she was listening. The bottom line is, back to proper chain of custody on paper, which implies bye bye to effectively uncontrollable mail-in ballots. But this is secondary, the primary thing is failed moral duty and acts of the guilty mind. Going forward the question is, will there be resort to constitutional backstops or will there be a revolutionary situation when a critical mass sees that they have been betrayed into an existential threat. KFkairosfocus
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
05:15 AM
5
05
15
AM
PST
Two Pennsylvania representatives explain how the Supreme Court, the secretary of state, and others in the commonwealth have defied every effort at election integrity. (and transparency, i.e. "take our word for it", the 'officials' say, 'the election in Pennsylvania was legit, and no we will not let you legislators, who are, constitutionally, responsible for insuring election integrity, see the data from which we 'officials' certified the election'.) An Insider's View of Pennsylvania and the Battle for Our Republic By Frank Ryan and Dawn Keefer Excerpt: A comparison of official county election results to the total number of voters who voted on November 3, 2020, as recorded by the Department of State (DoS), shows that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast, while the DoS's Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors (SURE) system records indicate that just 6,760,230 total voters actually voted. Among the 6,962,607 total ballots cast, 6,931,060 total votes were counted in the presidential race, including all three candidates on the ballot and write-in candidates. The difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to an alarming discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between the two major candidates for president of the United States.,,,, According to the DAG report, "DOS' denial of access to critical documents and excessive redaction of documentation resulted in DAG being unable to fully achieve three of the eight audit objectives. ... This sustained refusal to cooperate with our information requests was done without DOS providing any plausible justification for their noncooperation. Accordingly, DAG was unable to establish with any degree of reasonable assurance that the SURE system is secure and that Pennsylvania voter registration records are complete, accurate, and in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and related guidelines." Additionally, the report indicated: [W]hile DOS requested this audit, management does not seem to grasp that we cannot properly conclude and satisfy the audit objectives in accordance with generally accepted Government Auditing Standards without obtaining sufficient appropriate evidence, which they refused to provide to us.",,, Just as the DoS refuted and ignored deficiencies reported by the auditor general, the department is again dismissing issues and inconsistencies identified by members of the General Assembly, without providing access to any substantiating information. Pennsylvanians deserve better. Our nation deserves better. The challenges we submitted were the result of findings from the DoS's publicly provided data. The DoS explanation that the data they provide to the public are not the same data used to certify the elections demonstrates yet another process failure and roadblock for transparency.,,, - Col. Frank Ryan, CPA, USMCR (ret.) represents the 101st District in the PA House of Representatives, and Rep. Dawn Keefer represents the 92nd District in the PA House of Representatives. https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/01/an_insiders_view_of_pennsylvania_and_the_battle_for_our_republic.html Again, these are not the actions of innocent people trying to clear their name but are the actions of guilty people trying to cover their tracks! Also from American Thinker this morning, Proof of fraud may lie in vanishing Trump votes (with video clip from Scott Adams of Dilbert fame) By Andrea Widburg https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/01/proof_of_fraud_may_lie_in_vanishing_trump_votes.html#ixzz6iUO4QPFsbornagain77
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
04:51 AM
4
04
51
AM
PST
@heks:
Chinese Smart TVs on a network might compromise security and allow for spying and exfiltration of data? What a crazy conspiracy theory. Oh … wait a minute: https://securityledger.com/2020/12/dhs-looking-into-cyber-risk-from-tcl-smart-tvs/ https://www.tomsguide.com/news/tcl-smart-tv-security-flaws
Have you actually read the articles? Did the voting systems store the voting lists on the Smart TV?
What a crazy conspiracy theory.
No it's not. Vulnerabilities and back doors in Smart TVs are real.AndyClue
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
03:43 AM
3
03
43
AM
PST
@kairosfocus:
You are actually responding to SA.
You're right. I'm sorry for the mistake.AndyClue
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
03:41 AM
3
03
41
AM
PST
BA77, Viva Frei is a gold mine, start with the WI case I put as an u/d to OP. KF PS: Hunter's rocky start looks like time to buy some popcorn.kairosfocus
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
03:28 AM
3
03
28
AM
PST
On Dec. 17 this video came out,,,
2020 Election shows Joe Biden over-performs in 72% of counties using Dominion Voting Systems - December 17, 2020 https://rumble.com/vbz2ld-2020-election-shows-joe-biden-over-performs-in-72-of-counties-using-dominio.html
,,, which showed that there was indeed a unexplained voting bias in counties that used Dominion Voting Systems,,, from the video description we find this,,,
"This analysis revealed that counties that used Dominion and Hart InterCivic ballot counting devices and software consistently gave a 5% vote advantage to candidate Joe Biden over President Trump. This advantage was observed regardless of the county's majority political party affiliation nor urban, suburban, or rural area demographics."
Dr. Cornelius Hunter picked up on this video and wrote a blog post saying that the p-value for fraud, based on the data, was a virtual certainty,, "reported as 0",,, . but Dr. Hunter ended up taking that blog post down.,,, For a couple of weeks I wondered exactly what had happened so as to make Dr. Hunter take that blog post down, then, apparently after doing his homework, Dr. Hunter wrote a series of blog posts in which he revealed a more precise calculation for p-values,, using a better data source,,,,,, I will clip,,,
Dominion D-Suite 5.5-A, B Correlates with Voting Trends An Obvious Trend Excerpt: even a cursory examination of the voting data reveals a significant, large-scale, voting trend correlating with the voting machines used. As the chart below shows, the Republican presidential candidate performance measure is sharply lower for the Dominion D-Suite 5.5-A, B voting machine systems, compared to the other types of systems in use. https://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2020/12/dominion-d-suite-55-b-correlates-with.html The Dominion D-Suite 5.5-A, B Voting Trend Sometimes Correlation Does Result from Causation Excerpt: From the above chart, we reject the null hypothesis that the category 5 voting machine systems (Dominion D-Suite 5.5-A, B) voting trends are due to chance (p-value: 3.3E-12). In other words, the sharp decrease in our voting trend metric for the category 5 voting machine systems is due to non-random factors. https://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-dominion-d-suite-55-b-voting-trend.html The MicroVote Voting Trend A Plausible Trend Excerpt: Here we repeat the analysis, using the same metric except from the Democratic perspective. Now the chart looks like this:,, ,, In this case, as shown, the most extreme outlier is the MicroVote_EMS_4.0B Modification voting machine systems. The difference is that in this case there is a plausible explanation. First, the sample size for this outlier is smaller, by less than a third, compared to the Dominion outlier we looked at last time. Secondly, this outlier is not nearly as extreme. But most importantly, the obvious explanation for this weak Democratic candidate performance, for the MicroVote_EMS_4.0B Modification voting machine systems, is geographic location. These systems are mostly in Tennessee, with an additional few counties in Indiana. This geographic region is solidly Republican. For example, in 2016 these counties voted on average about 75% for the Republican candidate, and less than 25% for the Democratic candidate. Given the energy that President Trump has generated going into the 2020 election, it certainly is a plausible explanation that the drop in the Democratic performance metric, shown in the above chart, is due to the geographic region covered by the MicroVote machines. As we saw last time, no such explanation was available for the Dominion D-Suite 5.5-A, B voting machine systems. https://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2020/12/the-microvote-voting-trend.html Extreme County Trends What is Going on in Georgia? Excerpt: The expected value on the chance hypothesis is 0.628 (on average) Georgia counties to be represented, with a standard deviation of 0.630. We obviously can reject the null hypothesis that this occurred by chance (the p-value is so small it is reported simply as 0). Also, all of these eight Georgia counties use the Dominion D-Suite 5.5-A voting machine systems. [Ed: Edited pending discovery of possible explanation] https://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2020/12/extreme-county-trends-part-i.html Clear Ballot_ClearVote_2 Voting Machine Systems in Pennsylvania An Interesting Intrastate Trend Excerpt: We have looked at irregular voting trends (here, here, here, and here) including a trend across several states that correlated with a voting machine type (here). We now look at a trend within the state of Pennsylvania that correlates with the Clear Ballot_ClearVote_2 Voting Machine System.,,, Across the Clear Ballot counties our metric has a mean value of -.865, significantly lower than the observed mean value of 0.168 across the remaining 59 Pennsylvania counties. We can easily reject the null hypothesis that this deviation in the Clear Ballot counties was due to chance (p-value 5.3E-10). https://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2020/12/clear-ballotclearvote2-voting-machine.html The Dominion D-Suite 5.5-A, B Voting Trend, Revised Sometimes Correlation Does Result from Causation Excerpt: ,,, we have updated our voting machine system database,,,, But once again, the voting machine system category 6 (Dominion D-Suite 5.5-A, B) is an outlier. It shows that same, significant, reduction in the 2020 Republican vote relative to the 2016 Republican vote, which is unexplained by any of the above factors. To a lesser extent voting machine system category 15 is also an outlier, but here we have the plausible explanation that it is dominated by left-leaning Virginia counties. Also shown on the chart in a red line which is a linear fit to the data, excluding the Dominion category 6 data point. Using this linear fit as our null hypothesis, we conclude the Dominion outlier cannot be plausibly ascribed to chance (p-value: 5.7E-4). This is an obvious, statistically significant, problem. https://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2021/01/the-dominion-d-suite-55-b-voting-trend.html
Dr. Hunter also recently, i.e. this morning, took issue with a early December article, via The Washington Post, that tried to claim that there was 'nothing to see here' in regards to Dominion voting machines,,
The Washington Post’s Philip Bump Presents a Statistical Analysis Disproving Election Fraud There are Lies, Damn Lies, and Then … Excerpt: We analyzed Bump’s article and reconstructed his analysis, using our own data sources,,,, These numbers are way off. Our vote tallies are almost 10 times what Bump reports for the Dominion counties, and 10 times what he reports for the non-Dominion counties, to his level of precision. So it is a rocky start for Bump and the Washington Post on this important story. Unfortunately, it gets worse as we will see in the coming posts. https://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2021/01/the-washington-posts-philip-bump.html
bornagain77
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
03:16 AM
3
03
16
AM
PST
BO'H: the voter verification device, aka Poll Pad [it is iPad based], was in use in a voting centre, during the ongoing early vote phase of the GA Senate runoff. The implications for other states and the Nov 3 election are patent. Of course all of this is secondary, the failed moral duty to sustain election integrity and more recently the guilty mind conduct in that same Fulton County are decisive, cf my 1900 above. The real issue at this point is whether this will be addressed on Constitutional backstops or as a revolutionary situation as people in numbers see institutionalisation of industrial scale election fraud so going forward elections will have nothing to do with the genuine consent of the governed. That is playing with civilisation burning level nuclear fire. KF PS: Back then we all supported Brazil in my neck of the woods; the Pele effect. W Germany vs Holland, not even Italy, natch.kairosfocus
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
03:04 AM
3
03
04
AM
PST
F/N: U/D23 I clip from the Viva Frei collection, the WI case, exposing the inconsistent, fallacious pattern of the Courts in the post election cases. KFkairosfocus
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
02:58 AM
2
02
58
AM
PST
kf @ 1974 (an auspicious year if you're German) -
AC, perhaps as context it would be helpful to know these machines are not supposed to be on the Internet for obvious reasons. Further to this, live, during the session, there was report of such connexion being made.
Apparently he claimed to have hacked into a poll pad. It can be connected to the internet, so that it can be updated with the latest voter registration data, but apparently this is disabled when voting takes place.Bob O'H
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
02:56 AM
2
02
56
AM
PST
JVL @ 1966 (an auspicious number) -
In fact, I really dislike the new practice of referring to any thespian as an ‘actor’. It seems to me you’re losing information when you refer to Judi Dench as an ‘actor’ instead of an ‘actress’.
Of course she should be referred to as Dame Judy Dench. :-)Bob O'H
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
02:47 AM
2
02
47
AM
PST
AC, You are actually responding to SA. This is what I actually wrote, at 1959, which goes to different considerations:
we are looking at an attempt to rewrite English, Orwellian style, in which men and women and natural familial relationships are forced under colour of law to fit in with the attempt to deny that we are humans and come in two complementary sexes. This then becomes a false substitute for morality as it will be pretended that a father being called that is oppression; but truth is what liberates. In the day of lies and perversities the most revolutionary act of defiant freedom is to speak the truth embedded in accurate description of reality. A is itself A i/l/o its core characteristics. That first pivot of rationality is what they would steal from us, slandering us as oppressors for daring to speak truth.
The clip I gave earlier is a declared intent, which is a signal of how radical the presumptive returning house leadership is. I don't know if it was always so but was checked by perceived societal balances of acceptability, or has recently shifted far left but this stuff is not just an issue of sexual identity but of critical theory redicalisation. No, it is not just wrecking the language, it is using language under false colour of law to push a revolution that in the end is totalitarian, anti-civilisational, misanthropic and fundamentally warped as well as rebellious against the nature of being human. This last is organically connected to rights so to justice and sound function of the state. Even before power is firmly in their grasp, signals are being sent of utterly ruthless radical intent. That is of course the nature of marxism and cultural forms will prove/are proving to be no exception. The in-progress 4th gen civil war will ratchet up in the year ahead, a year of strategic decision. Unfortunately, the geostrategic cost in the wider global conflict will be high. KFkairosfocus
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
02:12 AM
2
02
12
AM
PST
Chinese Smart TVs on a network might compromise security and allow for spying and exfiltration of data? What a crazy conspiracy theory. Oh ... wait a minute: https://securityledger.com/2020/12/dhs-looking-into-cyber-risk-from-tcl-smart-tvs/ https://www.tomsguide.com/news/tcl-smart-tv-security-flawsHeKS
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
02:08 AM
2
02
08
AM
PST
HeKS, thanks. KFkairosfocus
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
01:55 AM
1
01
55
AM
PST
@kairosfocus:
This is social engineering - manipulating the public.
They were already manipulating the public with the old rules, by prescribing a certain language.
They’re changing one set of terms for another, as if they are equivalent or better. Now, people are forced to use the terms prescribed by the rules. The terms father, mother, son, daughter, brother are no longer reflected or found in the rules – they are unjustly replaced by others.
If you look at the current rules, you will find both: "father, mother" and "parent". You can call someone a father. A father is a parent, right? Or are you saying the old rules forbade you from calling a parent a father in certain contexts??AndyClue
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
01:55 AM
1
01
55
AM
PST
AC, perhaps as context it would be helpful to know these machines are not supposed to be on the Internet for obvious reasons. Further to this, live, during the session, there was report of such connexion being made. Going back to the election and the Antrim County software inspection, there are affiant references to such connectivity including to the bottom right of screen connected icon we all know so well. This is just one corner of a very big picture. KFkairosfocus
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
01:54 AM
1
01
54
AM
PST
MUST WATCH VIDEO: Jovan Pulitzer Reveals Electronic Voting Machines in Georgia Communicating with Vendor in China By Cristina Laila – December 31, 2020 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/must-watch-video-jovan-pulitzer-reveals-electronic-voting-machines-georgia-communicating-vendor-china/
Wow. There's a hidden wireless network with a chinese Smart TV on it. And somehow that indicates "Electronic Voting Machines in Georgia Communicating with Vendor in China"?!? The Smart TV is communicating with its vendor, NOT the voting machine. And where did he get the idea that the TV is sucking up all the data from the place? What data is he talking about??? That's a public place, right? People visit it with their smartphones? There are cameras installed? Some of them streaming live? Btw. he was wondering why there was a hidden network. I assume the employees didn't want their internal network to be publicly visible. Nothing unusual here. They probably thought that, if the network is hidden, then they don't need a password. That's a common mistake. Open hidden networks are easily accessible without any knowledge of the SSID.AndyClue
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
01:20 AM
1
01
20
AM
PST
BTW, this is a useful resource: https://hereistheevidence.com/ Also, here's a link to Matt Braynard's findings: https://youtu.be/XH9ihoLi1NA And here's a more condensed interview about his findings: https://youtu.be/atkp6fnwk9wHeKS
January 3, 2021
January
01
Jan
3
03
2021
01:03 AM
1
01
03
AM
PST
KF @1962
HeKS, yes you have given food for thought. Can you give some sources? KF
That might depend on what you want sources for. I've been scanning the news during this period but it's mostly garbage. I've mainly been watching lawyers and I've assimilated a lot of information, but I haven't been bookmarking most of the stuff about the cases. If you want to get just a ton of legal info about this stuff, go on youtube and look at the weekly streams from Viva Frei and Robert Barnes. Usually the streams are broken down into segments over the next few days after they happen, so it should be fairly easy to identify relevant segments. They talk about the cases on there and the historical indicia of election/voter fraud. Barnes has been talking about the importance of a proper signature audit since the beginning. There was a record low rejection rate of mail-in ballots in 2020, particularly in the areas in question. The difference between the actual rejection rate and the normal rejection rate easily surpasses Biden's seeming margin of victory. Matt Braynard has also done some detailed work on illegal votes cast in the swing states. Normal extrapolation of his findings from his sample sizes would also point to illegal votes exceeding the margin of victory in multiple swing states. Attempted criticisms of his work seems silly, because they mischaracterize his approach and try to question it's reliability, when they very experts who are being asked to disprove his claims as unreliable have said in their own prior work that the methods he used are the best and most reliable ones available (such as use the National Change of Address database to confirm votes were cast in a state by people who are no longer eligible to vote in that state). So again, if you want sources for anything, it might depend on what specifically you're looking to have sourced. You can find lots of relevant stuff on this channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/VivaFrei/videos Take care, HeKSHeKS
January 2, 2021
January
01
Jan
2
02
2021
10:26 PM
10
10
26
PM
PST
BA77
At 9:11 p.m. local time, Trump received 29,391 votes as Biden simultaneously received 17,218. However, in the next reported time update, Trump’s votes became 17,218 while Biden’s changed to 29,391.
When I saw their presentation on this a couple of days ago I was shocked. I am afraid that the evidence of a massive, and very stupidly-planned fraud is so deep and so extreme, that some people will no longer be able to be outraged. After a while, you just end up speechless. But on the other hand, it can get dangerous. Some imbalanced people go much farther than just grumbling on blog posts, and very horrible things can emerge when people feel that the government is committing blatant crimes against them, disrespecting the sacredness of their vote, and forcing an unjust change in our government and way of life. When people feel they have no voice, that nobody is listening to their cries about injustices, their votes are being stolen and trashed, and blatantly obvious crimes are covered up and lied about - then there is grave danger that they will lash out.Silver Asiatic
January 2, 2021
January
01
Jan
2
02
2021
07:22 PM
7
07
22
PM
PST
JVL
Our language is rich and full of history; when you start to ‘outlaw’ some words you cut down on its heritage and richness.
Well said - I fully agree. I like your point about "actor" being used as the sole term - yes, it does remove valuable information that we have with "actress". I think it's disrespectful to the long and famous tradition of the English language. I was trying to help someone in a social situation recently and pointed to the information counter and said "she really has a lot of information and can help you". The girl at the info desk frowned at me and said "I'm a they". Ok, it's bad enough that she's confused about her sexuality and identity, but she's butchering the language and grammar. And I am forced to accept it for no rational reason.Silver Asiatic
January 2, 2021
January
01
Jan
2
02
2021
07:10 PM
7
07
10
PM
PST
This is called cheating,,,, Georgia Data Shows 17,650 of Trump’s Votes Removed, Another 12,173 Switched to Biden: Data Scientists BY ALLEN ZHONG January 2, 2021 Excerpt: Georgia election data indicates 17,650 votes were removed from President Donald Trump and another 12,173 votes were switched to Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, data scientists testified on Wednesday during a state Senate hearing. Lynda McLaughlin from the Data Integrity Group, along with data scientists Justin Mealey and Dave Lobue, presented the results before the Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections. Mealey worked as an electronic warfare technician in the U.S. Navy for nine and a half years and was a former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) contractor as a data analyst and programmer for the National Counterterrorism Center. He currently works for one of the “Big Four” accounting firms as a programmer. Lobue is a data scientist with over a decade of experience in a number of industries. “What we have here is we actually have fraud that we can prove in this election, there was fraud in Georgia’s election, we can prove it with data,” Mealey said. “The voting will of the people of Georgia is not reflected in what was certified by the Secretary of State.” According to their analysis on time series election data which was published online as early as Dec. 24, Trump’s votes were decrementing in various counties instead of increasing as they do normally. 17,650 votes were allegedly removed from Trump as result. The removals happened at the county level and were hard to be observed at the state level because the decrements were offset by accurate data uploaded by other counties. “I want to make that very, very clear that at no point in an incremental process, should you decrement it,” Mealey said. The group said a huge number of Trump’s votes were also observed being switched to Biden in a separate event. A “clear example of vote switching” happened in Bibb county, they said. At 9:11 p.m. local time, Trump received 29,391 votes as Biden simultaneously received 17,218. However, in the next reported time update, Trump’s votes became 17,218 while Biden’s changed to 29,391. In this single event, 12,173 votes were switched, the data scientists believe. State-certified election results show Trump lost Georgia by 12,670 votes. The Trump campaign is still challenging the results in various courts. The Data Integrity Group didn’t name any state official, county official, or related voting machine manufacturers for wrongdoing. They emphasized that the analysis is not partisan. “The analysis we’re going to be reviewing is purely scientific, not based on any political affiliation, red, blue, left, or right. The objective really focuses on numbers, data, and machine network systems,” Lobue stated. The Georgia state secretary’s office didn’t respond to a request for comment from The Epoch Times. State Secretary Brad Raffensperger and his office have denied vehemently that systemic election fraud occurred during the November election. - read more here: https://www.theepochtimes.com/georgia-election-data-shows-17650-votes-switched-from-trump-to-biden-data-scientists_3640670.htmlbornagain77
January 2, 2021
January
01
Jan
2
02
2021
05:37 PM
5
05
37
PM
PST
Two young and brilliant experts share information that basically proves that President Trump won the 2020 election. Below are their insights. The first young gentleman to share reasons why President Trump won the election is Pearson Sharp at OAN. Mr. Sharp’s presentation was excellent and was tweeted by the President: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1344867453915029504 In addition to Sharp’s presentation at OAN, Seth Keshel gave another excellent presentation at Purtalk where he focused on bellwether counties and states and the improbabilities that President Trump won these elections but somehow lost to Joe Biden in the overall race. https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=xXMW9VNMPT4&feature=youtu.be PureSocialTV - Doug Wade Interview Seth Keshel, former Army Intelligence Captain. They discuss political trends with the states and the election 2020 anomalies. This is a must watch and SHARE,bornagain77
January 2, 2021
January
01
Jan
2
02
2021
04:08 PM
4
04
08
PM
PST
Silver Asiatic: JVL disappeared … but he wondered “what’s wrong” with this LGBT agenda.
require Congress to “honor all gender identities by changing pronouns and familial relationships in the House rules to be gender neutral.”
Seems pointless but I did once write a user manual for a software program I wrote and used no 'he's or 'she's. It's not that hard to use 'they' or 'the user' instead. But, again, I wouldn't go out of my way to support that particular piece of legislation. In fact, I really dislike the new practice of referring to any thespian as an 'actor'. It seems to me you're losing information when you refer to Judi Dench as an 'actor' instead of an 'actress'. But I'm losing that battle for sure. I'm not even going to get started on 'chairperson' or those things. I'd much rather say 'chairwoman' if the position is held by a female. I think my opinion on this is similar to my view on statues that some people object to. Our language is rich and full of history; when you start to 'outlaw' some words you cut down on its heritage and richness. End of rant.JVL
January 2, 2021
January
01
Jan
2
02
2021
03:15 PM
3
03
15
PM
PST
1 2 3 4 5 … 69