Correspondence with Australian reporter
Here’s an exchange with an Australian reporter who asked some perceptive questions about ID (my answers are interspersed in italics): Read More ›
Here’s an exchange with an Australian reporter who asked some perceptive questions about ID (my answers are interspersed in italics): Read More ›
Mark Perakh has weighed in with yet another screed against my work (go here). He seems out of his element. I’m still awaiting his detailed critique of “Searching Large Spaces” — does he even understand the relevant math?
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=4702 Will Bush and the current pope do to Darwinism what Reagan and the previous pope did to Marxism?
Here’s an illuminating comment from journalist friend on the media’s increasing attention to ID: Read More ›
Evolution: Debate it
By John Angus Campbell and Stephen C. Meyer
I expect Harvard will have as much success resolving the origin of life problem as they have winning the NCAA men’s basketball championship. Harvard Jumps Into Evolution Debate CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — Harvard University is joining the long-running debate over the theory of evolution by launching a research project to study how life began. To view the entire Washington Post article, go here.
http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewPrint&articleId=10115
In the blue corner, God. In the red corner, Evolution. Will they kiss and make up or will they punch each other’s teeth out? Find out at the Pandasthumb: http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2005/08/julian_sanchez.html http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2005/08/my_response_to.html
In case you missed this when it came out: https://uncommondescent.com/documentation/Berlinski_Darwinian_Doubts.pdf.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/noscript.shtml?/radio/aod/radio4_aod.shtml?radio4/point_of_view
THE CASE AGAINST INTELLIGENT DESIGN.
The Faith That Dare Not Speak Its Name
—THE NEW REPUBLIC—
by Jerry Coyne
Post date: 08.11.05
Issue date: 08.22.05
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20050822&s=coyne082205
The Pandasthumb blog is instructive for understanding how our most virulent opponents think. Informed, coherent thought is not always in evidence there. Perhaps the most extreme counterexample I’ve encountered recently is the following set of remarks by someone named Ed Darrell. I leave it to commenters on this blog to have fun with it: Read More ›
http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=38829
Vatican Observatory head clashes with cardinal on evolution
London, Aug. 05 (CWNews.com) – The director of the Vatican Observatory has distanced himself from the perspective on evolution put forward by Cardinal Christoph Schönborn (bio – news). Read More ›
Here’s an illuminating email I received from a reporter in Germany. It indicates that the Darwinist strategy of savaging ID may not be working. (Note that I emailed this reporter a few documents in answer to his questions): Read More ›