Forget the selfish gene; no, no, it’s the ribosome that’s selfish, say researchers
Quick Survey – Deletion of Single Email Messages
I know this may be a bit unusual for the typical fare, but since we have a number of engineers and other tech-savvy readers, I thought I would solicit your help with a quick tech-related survey. Recently I have been in discussion with a Google engineer about gmail. The discussion began when he asked me which email address (among several that I have) I preferred to use. I replied that I would use gmail more if the mobile Android app permitted deletion of single messages, rather than entire conversations. He seemed surprised that anyone would want to delete a single message and asked me for some “use cases” that would call for deletion of a single message, rather than an Read More ›
No tree of life or of intelligence? There is no tree of compassion either
Evolvability and openness to innovation are features not just of life but of information itself?
Fake shark stunts out at Discovery TV … but why were they ever IN?
Podcast: Michael Denton on paradigm shifts he’s witnessed in science
Creationists terrified again?
Intelligible Design?
Latest life on Mars hint
Harvard Professor: When it Comes to Climate Alarmism, Scientists Should be More Like Religious Adherents
Here The 95 percent confidence limit reflects a long tradition in the history of science that valorizes skepticism as an antidote to religious faith. But when it comes to climate alarmism, it is time to dump that standard.
How do we get around fine-tuning in particle physics?
Salon, on the utter triumph of Darwin — NOT
An article in Salon caught my eye while looking at other things online: Saturday, Jan 3, 2015 10:00 AM -0400 God is on the ropes: The brilliant new science that has creationists and the Christian right terrified A young MIT professor is finishing Darwin’s task — and threatening to undo everything the wacky right holds dear Paul Rosenberg The triumphalistic tone and immediate leap to a socio-cultural and/or aggressive materialistic agenda backed up by denigratory caricatures, published in a seemingly respectable magazine, already speak inadvertent volumes. But the lead-in to the piece (leaving off some rhetorical points-scoring off the bogeymen Mr Rosenberg particularly targets and evidently views as insane) is where the other shoe, proverbially, drops: Darwin also didn’t have Read More ›
Worth a read: Epigenetics and cancer
New atheist Sam Harris accused of plagiarizing Mark Steyn
Yes, that Mark Steyn Well, at least Harris has good taste. File under: Not breaking. Already bust. Please remove all chocolate from pockets before melting down. No. Really.