Denyse O'Leary
Giberson and Stephens in New York Times: “Hard to recognize our religious tradition in the mainstream evangelical conversation”
Why atheists will doubt Darwin ahead of Biologos and American Scientific Affiliation
Why Caroline Crocker observed that ID was treated with disdain at the ASA conference
Growing demand from governments worldwide, to control the Internet
NPR’s Ira Flatow interviews Simon-Baron-Cohen on empathy vs. evil
Materialist atheism stays in charge – how do doubters survive?
Blast from the past: Baylor-friendly family wanted prof fired for insufficient Darwinism
Are charter schools the answer to science education deadwood?
John Stossel thinks so: I visited another charter chain, American Indian Public Charter Schools in Oakland, Calif., that gets similar top results, also at lower cost. “Kids in American Indian Public Charter Schools score so far above the average for the state for public school children that there isn’t even a word for it,” says Andrew Coulson, director of the Cato Institute’s Center for Educational Freedom. Those schools use methods different from the charters in Harlem. For example, they pay some kids to tutor other kids. Both charters do something that regular public schools rarely do: fire teachers. One charter principal calls it “freeing up a person’s future.” (“Exciting Schools” Townhall , September 21, 2011) Of course, part of this Read More ›
I am glad Eric Anderson is happy with his three thousand tyrants
Do intelligent desgn theorists need the supernatural – just to leave room for a little mystery in life?
Skepticism can be just another scheme for avoiding reality
In “The Believing Brain: Why Science Is the Only Way Out of Belief-Dependent Realism” Scientific American (July 5, 2011), Michael Shermer informs us, dependency on belief and its host of psychological biases is why, in science, we have built-in self-correcting machinery. Strict double-blind controls are required, in which neither the subjects nor the experimenters know the conditions during data collection. Collaboration with colleagues is vital. Results are vetted at conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. Research is replicated in other laboratories. Disconfirming evidence and contradictory interpretations of data are included in the analysis. If you don’t seek data and arguments against your theory, someone else will, usually with great glee and in a public forum. This is why skepticism is a Read More ›