Christian Darwinism
BioLogos and the worship of consensus
FYI/FTR: Making basic sense of FSCO/I, functionally specific complex organisation and associated information
There is a current wave of attempts in an around UD to cloud, strawmannise, obfuscate, twist into pretzels and dismiss the observed (and measurable) phenomenon, functionally specific, complex organisation and/or associated information, FSCO/I. Accordingly, let us first note the root of the concept in the work of leading OOL — origin of life — researchers in the 1970’s: ORGEL, 1973: . . . In brief, living organisms are distinguished by their specified complexity. Crystals are usually taken as the prototypes of simple well-specified structures, because they consist of a very large number of identical molecules packed together in a uniform way. Lumps of granite or random mixtures of polymers are examples of structures that are complex but not specified. The Read More ›
The High God of Random strikes at hazard
Something tells me Paul Nelson will be waiting a long time
Darwin’s checkmate
BioLogos’ former prez softens stance toward Darwin’s Doubt book
Christian Reformed Church votes not to have committee on “evolution”
From Britain’s foremost Christian Darwinist, Denis Alexander
An old painting reminds me of what is at stake in the Adam and Eve wars
New York Times’ story about Bryan College prof uproar is really about the New York Times
Is Evolution a Theory of Similarity or Transformation?
Let me ask you a question – is evolution a theory of similarity, or one of transformation? This is a big question because it affects the nature and adequacy of evidence presented to support it. What’s really surprising is the answer that evolutionists give to this question.
Read More ›