Darwinism
Here’s the Khan Academy education vid, attacking intelligent design
Britain’s chief rabbi on the Brit riots: Restore civil society (but that means less Dawkins)
Researchers: Smart birds are all post-Communists now
BBC responds to viewer’s complaint about Paxman and Dawkin’s two-man hatefest
Is Michele Bachman giving the “anti-science” story some legs? Her recent comments on vaccine leave many wondering …
How one student paid for questioning Darwinism
Darwinian ethics
In this article in the Daily Telegraph (UK), we see some typical philosophical and cultural applications of Darwinism: People are unfaithful to their marriages Therefore, it is natural Therefore, it is right i.e. What is, is what is right. Since we are no more than nature, all that we do is thus natural – and who can object to that? Take away the Darwinian assumptions, and what is the basis of this article? There are none. But does the author ever examine those assumptions? Nope.